April Stundie Nomination thread

In the context of water vapor being a greenhouse gas:

And now I see why we don't talk science.

No where on this planet is steam a gas. Nowhere.

There's a delicious irony in the "Let's talk science" gang not having a clue what greenhouse gases are.



(Semantically true: that misty stuff we see coming out of a boiling tea kettle's spout, colloquially called 'steam' is a suspension of condensed water droplets. But in context? Water vapo(u)r is not a gas? Yikes.)
 
Not one single professional physicist on Earth agrees with brantc's crackpot notion about the physical makeup of the Sun. (It has a solid iron surface!) And why is it that they are all wrong and he's right? You read it here first (or second if you're following the thread)...

I'm sure I can make up a model and fine tune it to match observations as is done in science commonly these days. I dont do science like that, or at least try not to.
 
Nominating jammonius for his response to a question asking him how he made the leap of faith that a van driving down the street, which was totally different from a van he pointed out in a prior photograph, was the "perps" getting away:



ETA: Whole long post is here, but the last line is the only part I'm nominating.

My irony meter just asploded....

Coming from someone who thinks "wisdom" is a fallacy that is priceless.
 
I posted a link of liquid explosives that would work.
Of course most demolitions experts probably don't even know about the material since it is cloaked in national security.

Cloaked in National Security, but yet he posted a link to the companies webpage??

I'm confused.....
 
1st stundie nomination

911Peacenik said:
they want (someone/anyone) to exfoliate any shred of evidence on the steel.......forever. Any examination of the steel will be riddled with controversy once it leaves the protection of the hanger.

In the comments on their article 'The Port Authority Seeks New Homes for WTC 9/11 Steel' over here http://www.911blogger.com/node/23113



We all know the best way to prevent investigations for evidence of explosives on steel is to make it availible to the public.
 
The government cause earthquakes and terrorist attacks......to prevent Michael Jackson's [Post Humus] comeback....

http://michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=8355

Hopeless said:
It may be absolutly silly, but i noticed that on some dates we thought Michael comes back there happens a earthquake....to stop it ? To show there power ? I don't know if the earthquakes are made of nature or not...my english isn't good enough to explain...
When 911 happens...Michael and his family are in NY and wanted to do a reunion...it never happens.
It's only a though....weird at all...
But what does Michael know and wanted to say to the world ?

ETA: For the record,they did manage their reunion,the 30th Anniversary concert was recorded before 9/11.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQzoU5UdR7c
 
Last edited:
Plautus Satire said:
I may get into trouble here but I think I remember some statistic like the buildings were designed to stand, with up to like forty percent of the structure removed. It was heavily over-engineered and designed to stand, no matter what. This is why the "pancake" theory is so absurd, it relies on the building being designed to collapse like a house of cards due to gravity, instead of being designed to RESIST the forces of gravity like every single construction on the face of the planet.

Thats right folks the buildings should still be there no matter what.

http://conspiracyscience.com/forums/topic/zarathustra-peterjoseph-speaks/page/4

Thanks to Edx for finding this supremely arrogant bawbag.
 
The building could also stand with 95% of its structure removed. Just remove the top 95% of the floors and hey, the rest of the building still stands.
 
In the comments on their article 'The Port Authority Seeks New Homes for WTC 9/11 Steel' over here http://www.911blogger.com/node/23113



We all know the best way to prevent investigations for evidence of explosives on steel is to make it availible to the public.

Heh, "exfoliate" that's nice.

Sooooooo... is he saying the mainstream media are reliable, or that Rense is unreliable? :confused:

That's what I was wondering. I really wish Truthers knew how to write.
 
I tell ya folks this ain't rocket surgery


" Plautus Satire
Member

A successful hijacking is a hijacking where the hijacker successfully hijacks the plane. The two instances referenced in the wikipedia article you cited were both attempted hijackings that were foiled. This is not rocket surgery. "



http://conspiracyscience.com/forums/topic/zarathustra-peterjoseph-speaks/page/6


Its a tautology.
 
Last edited:
I tell ya folks this ain't rocket surgery


" Plautus Satire
Member

A successful hijacking is a hijacking where the hijacker successfully hijacks the plane. The two instances referenced in the wikipedia article you cited were both attempted hijackings that were foiled. This is not rocket surgery. "



http://conspiracyscience.com/forums/topic/zarathustra-peterjoseph-speaks/page/6


Its a tautology.

I think this guy is fake ... his name sure points to it, and there's also this:

This thread isn't really supposed to be about me, but since you brough tit up, that's not all I'm qualified to do. I'm also a medical doctor, and I develop software, I have extensive experience in various construction jobs and demolition work. That's just a small taste of my experience, but it should settle your stomach a little. I'm not just a treecutter, that's just one profession I've held.

Please tell me he's a fake CTist. Please ...

McHrozni
 

Back
Top Bottom