• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Antigravity, engine and experiments with a flying saucer.

MasterOgon said:
In order to prove the existence of ether, a number of experiments were also conducted. In the very first experiments in 1881, Michelson, using an interferometer, attempted to measure the velocity of the ether relative to the moving Earth and obtained an ether wind from 3 to 3.5 km / s, which did not correspond to the orbital speed of the planet at 30 km / s.
Click to expand...
I thought that the famous Michelson-Morley established that there was no movement of Earth relative to the aether whatsoever. They demonstrated that the speed of light was the same regardless of which direction their interferometer was pointing. This would not be possible if their was an "aether wind".

https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson–Morley_experiment
 
MasterOgon said:
I popularize this
Click to expand...

It is against the forum rules to post, verbatim, text that is available somewhere else.

You can post an exert, and provide a link to the original.

This is all going to get deleted and you will be warned to follow the membership agreement.
 
Ok, well, fascinating.

I do wonder though, why bother posting here when you could be making antigravity vehicles and becoming filthy rich?

Or is this one of those 'invest in my machine' type things. You're ALMOST there but need some money?
In which case I'd suggest getting into contact with the forum for the brilliant light machine, you might get them to send you money so you can use it (once it is ready) to power your machines (once they are ready).
 
Little 10 Toes said:
How about the OP explain why he is spamming the internet?

Almost the same verbiage is here at Cosmoquest: https://forum.cosmoquest.org/showth...y-engine-and-experiments-with-a-flying-saucer

I remember seeing some of the same photos there.

Any reason why you are making almost the same claims here? Are you going to stay and answer questions?

Taken from post number #15 from that thread with apologies to Reality Check since I jacked-up the formatting and included links:

Click to expand...

I thought that looked familiar!
 
Norman Alexander said:
Полная чушь.
Click to expand...

Norman Alexander said:
научная фантастика
Click to expand...

smartcooky said:
больше похоже на чистую фантазию
Click to expand...

Не думаю что вы сможете свое мнение обосновать чем-то, кроме принятых на веру догм современной науки и ссылок из Википедии. Но эксперимент, доказывающий их ошибочность, никуда не денется.
 
For the rest of us:

Norman Alexander said:
Complete nonsense
Click to expand...

Norman Alexander said:
science fiction
Click to expand...

smartcooky said:
more like pure fantasy
Click to expand...

MasterOgon said:
I don’t think that you can justify your opinion with anything other than the accepted dogmas of modern science and Wikipedia links. But the experiment proving their fallacy will not go anywhere.
Click to expand...

This service provided for you by Arthwollipot and Google Translate.
 
MasterOgon said:
snip
Click to expand...
You go to all the trouble of making multiple posts full of crackpot ideas to get enough reputation to add video and images, and this is all you've got?

You could have posted something more interesting, like a picture of your cat or a video showing how to get stains out of a blue dress. Hoping your next post will have something worth looking at!
 
psionl0 said:
I thought that the famous Michelson-Morley established that there was no movement of Earth relative to the aether whatsoever. They demonstrated that the speed of light was the same regardless of which direction their interferometer was pointing. This would not be possible if their was an "aether wind".

https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson–Morley_experiment
Click to expand...

That was the point at which I stopped reading. The Michelson-Morley experiment is well documented and widely reported at the time and repeated since.
http://www.exphy.uni-duesseldorf.de...Light Propagation at the 10-17 Level 2009.pdf
 
Wudang said:
That was the point at which I stopped reading. The Michelson-Morley experiment is well documented and widely reported at the time and repeated since.
http://www.exphy.uni-duesseldorf.de...Light Propagation at the 10-17 Level 2009.pdf
Click to expand...

As far as I know, opinions on this experiment are divided. But he is not the main one. The most important argument is:

"The principle of operation of the inertoid engine is based on the fact that there is a load inside it, which, with the help of an electric motor drive, makes periodic movement along a closed path inside the machine body. When moving in one direction, the force that accelerates the load is small, when moving in the opposite direction, the accelerating force is large According to Newton’s third law, when the load moves in one direction, it acts on the body of the inertoid with a small force not exceeding the inertial rest force of the inertoid on the Earth’s surface, and when moving in the other direction - with a large force exceeding the friction force and driving the inertoid.

The principle of action of inertcoids lies in the fact that their purposeful movement is caused by the difference in the frictional force in the support during direct and reverse half-cycle operation. With dry friction, the resistance to slow motion exceeds the resistance to fast (with one half-stroke, when a small force is applied, the static friction is not overcome and the apparatus remains in place; with a reverse half-cycle, the friction is overcome, the apparatus moves). In liquids, on the contrary, resistance to fast motion prevails over resistance to slow motion. The explanation of the effect in liquids is fundamentally different (since there is no rest friction force in liquids and gases) and is based on the viscous friction forces. " https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Инерцоиды


My experiment showed that there is no fundamental difference between dry and viscous friction. The inertioid moves in the liquid in the same direction as on a solid surface. This is because the water that it pushed forward, after a while pushes it from behind. This means that the interaction does not occur instantly. This is a fundamental mistake of science.

https://youtu.be/ECjTOa_mm5k
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom