• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Another sincere question for theists...

Re: Re: Re: God's Love?

farmermike said:
even mother Teresa would be considered a wretch
given that she actively promoted poverty, squalor, disease, and unwanted pregnancy, she certainly was a wretch.

on topic, i find the apologetics posted so far to be absolutely revolting. good thing that there is no rational reason to believe in this "loving" god.
 
Re: Re: Re: God's Love?

farmermike said:
I'm forbidden to answer that question on the grounds that I might be spending time in the treehouse.
But seriously,I think the idea is that compared to Jesus who was perfect in every way,even mother Teresa would be considered a wretch.I'd even go so far as to say that Benny Hinn is a wretch also.

There is a long way from perfect to a wretch.

My wife isn't perfect, but she is anything but a wretch. She is in fact a beautiful person.

This is the part I don't understand about christians, in particular. Why must they be so darn self loathing?

Assuming you don't consider your wife to be a wretch, let her know it. Compliment her, let her know that you think she is a wonderful person. She is the type of person who makes God look good, if you will.

Paedophilic preists are wretches of human beings. I don't think your wife is that bad.

One last thing, a little more harsh: Don't fall for the crap about "I am not even worthy to live, and it is only by God's grace that I am here in the first place." I don't know about you, but I didn't ask to be put here, so don't pretend that this is some special favor that God is doing me. As far as I can tell, I was perfectly content not being alivee (I certainly wasn't suffering). Now, since God threw me into this world, all I can do is make the best of it, and use the gifts he gave me (including the one for critical thought). But I will tell you, I don't see being alive on earth as being all that much of a gift.
 
Batman Jr. said:
Yeah, isn't Jesus kind of like the homeless guy that comes to wash your windows on your car and then demands some kind of fee for his unsolicited services? It's not exactly like I requested he die for my sins, so why should I be held responsible for footing the proverbial bill he imposes on us? And, if Jesus really died for our sins, shouldn't he be rotting in Hell right now? Once he was murdered, he just returned to Heaven, and I always thought that to be somewhat of a cop-out considering that he was purported to have taken on the burden of every malfeasance perpetrated in the entirety of human history. :D

Furthermore, we don't even know if Jesus suffered such an excruciating death ask could be divined by one that had observed the torture that had supposedly been inflicted upon him. He was, after all, omnipotent. He could have just conjured up some kind of anesthesia and made it magically appear in his bloodstream or something for all we know. Perhaps he was no less a con-artist than modern-day televangelists.

Good point. I imagine there have been thousands of people in this world who suffered a lot worse than Jesus did as they died.
 
I admire Kant and the Categorical Imperative. One of the axioms of the derived morality of the CI is that one should "act in such a way that you always treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, never simply as a means, but always at the same time as an end."


God kills Jobs sons and daughters in order to win a bet with the devil (Job 1:18-19).

While freeing His choosen people, God hardens Pharaoh's heart, so that Pharaoh would not let the children of Israel go out of his land (Ex 11:10). God then kills the firstborn of all Egyptians from "firstborn of Pharaoh that sat on his throne unto the firstborn of the captive that was in the dungeon" (Ex. 12:29-30).

...........................

As for looking around and seeing evidence of God's love, I can't see, or even imagine, what difference having none of God's love in the world would be. Matthew 5:45 says that "He maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust." If there were no God intervening in the affairs of humans, then the sun would still rise on the evil and good and the rain would still fall on the just and unjust.

People pray for the recovery of sick people, yet these sick people get better at exactly the same rate as sick people who are not prayed for.

............................

Lastly, have you thought of getting your own screen name so we can easily distinguish between you and your spouse?
 
....Karen.....
O.K. then, so the general consensus seems to be that life sucks. Well, that's a starting point because I think God would be in full agreement, that the things we value most and spend our time chasing, are profoundly unsatisfying. Of course, we tend not to like the solution because it positions us in a place of need, which is an affront to our independence. However,we are not above faulting God(if indeed he exists), for neglecting to ramm himself down our throats.
Concerning the problem of evil, I believe it offends God far more than it does me and that as well as being loving and merciful,he is eternal and just. "Let my heart be broken by the things that break God's heart," founder of World Vision.
I refer you to Pascal's Wager and just really encourage you to genuinely seek and knock.
...and oops, the stable was Bethlehem right?
...and thanks but don't worry about my self-esteem, it runs rather too high I'm sure
 
farmermike said:
....Karen.....
O.K. then, so the general consensus seems to be that life sucks. Well, that's a starting point because I think God would be in full agreement, that the things we value most and spend our time chasing, are profoundly unsatisfying. Of course, we tend not to like the solution because it positions us in a place of need, which is an affront to our independence. However,we are not above faulting God(if indeed he exists), for neglecting to ramm himself down our throats.


I'm sure there's a coherent thought in there somewhere, but I'll be jiggered if I can figure out what it is.



Concerning the problem of evil, I believe it offends God far more than it does me


Then why doesn't he get off his lazy arse and do something about it?




and that as well as being loving and merciful,he is eternal and just. "Let my heart be broken by the things that break God's heart," founder of World Vision.
I refer you to Pascal's Wager and just really encourage you to genuinely seek and knock.

You refer us to Pascal's Wager for what? Can't you do any better than a false dichomety?
 
Karen,

I didn't quite understand your last post, so I'll back up a couple

Mrs. Farmermike
I am convinced however, on the basis of lots of good evidence (empirical and otherwise) that there is more to this world than meets the eye and that our ultimate purpose on this earth is to pursue it(God); not to stroke his ego but to experience true contentment.

Would you share this evidence with us?
 
Ladewig said:
Karen,

I didn't quite understand your last post, so I'll back up a couple



Would you share this evidence with us?
I'd be glad to but this really has to be worked through on your own, hence the seek and knock bit, that seemed to leave you non-plussed.
Evidence for some kind of creator:
Knowledge-how did all that primordial ooze manage to successfully organize itself into a functioning single cell?-the logical extension being that a higher intelligence was involved
Consciousness-lots of interesting new findings in this field, indicating the existence of the soul, seperate from the brain
Physics/Astronomy- the minute fine tuning of the universe and our planet in particular/the obvious interventions in our world, compared with the rest of space
and so on and so on etc. etc.
Evidence for the Christian God
History-the enduring and unprecedented legacy of a carpenter from a backwater in Israel
-the early spread of Christianity in a hostile environment
-the testimony of millions
-the personal relationship alluded to in Pascal's Wager which holds that their is nothing to lose in giving God a shot and the sure knowledge that he exists, to be gained
This is not an exhaustive list but it is very nearly an exhausted contributor. I think you get the idea and I suspect it has failed to impress but really the scientific method is not suited to this particular task, although I believe God to be the ultimate scientist.
 
farmermike said:

Evidence for some kind of creator:
Knowledge-how did all that primordial ooze manage to successfully organize itself into a functioning single cell?-the logical extension being that a higher intelligence was involved

Begs the question: If basic RNA/DNA and organelles, and eventually simple cells could not self-assemble given all the environments (macro and micro) in all the universe over a very, very long period of time, where did this cell's vastly more complex creator come from? At a cellular scale, just the Earth alone has had many trillions of environments with various compositions over its life. Times however many planets (and other environments), in the whole of the universe?

Consciousness-lots of interesting new findings in this field, indicating the existence of the soul, seperate from the brain

Do you have any accessible citations for this? Whose findings for a 'soul' existing without a brain (and how is that 'soul' defined)?

Physics/Astronomy- the minute fine tuning of the universe and our planet in particular/the obvious interventions in our world, compared with the rest of space
and so on and so on etc. etc.

???

Have you actually studied these fields? The universe is a fairly chaotic place. Walk outside and look at that cratered moon and tell me how orderly even this single solar system is. Get a good look at the many meteorite craters on Earth while you're at it.

Evidence for the Christian God
History-the enduring and unprecedented legacy of a carpenter from a backwater in Israel
-the early spread of Christianity in a hostile environment
-the testimony of millions

Islam had a similarly troubled infancy, and similar 'millions' who claim it is the truth. All of the religions that have survived have done so in a 'hostile' environment. Downright darwinian.

-the personal relationship alluded to in Pascal's Wager which holds that their is nothing to lose in giving God a shot and the sure knowledge that he exists, to be gained

"Pascal's Wager" has been demolished in this forum so many ways it's funny. Which god is it safe to believe in? Which church of that god?

Starting with just the two core assumptions, "Afterlife+God", there's only a one in four chance your guess is correct. Throw in the other 'damned to hell if you're wrong' assumptions that so many Christian denominations disagree on, and the chances that your set of assumptions is right becomes vanishingly small. Never mind other possible 'jealous' gods that might exist who would take belief in a 'Jesus' demigod as an offense. Any way you look at it, Pascal's Wager is a sucker bet.

This is not an exhaustive list but it is very nearly an exhausted contributor. I think you get the idea and I suspect it has failed to impress but really the scientific method is not suited to this particular task, although I believe God to be the ultimate scientist.

If you look at 'god' as something of an 'ultimate scientist', then perhaps you might see how 'god' could be an anthropomorphic projection onto natural processes, such as evolution?
 
Welcome to the forum Karen.



"I'd be glad to but this really has to be worked through on your own, hence the seek and knock bit, that seemed to leave you non-plussed."


Not to long ago (maybe four months), I DID knock. I truly did. I asked God to reveal himself to me if he did indeed exist. Nothing happened. No euphoria, no flash of light, not even a simple sense of well being. I really am seeking the truth about the universe and I'm sure the majority of the people here are too. We are not running from God. I merely see no evidence to suggest he is there.


"Knowledge-how did all that primordial ooze manage to successfully organize itself into a functioning single cell?-the logical extension being that a higher intelligence was involved"


I have a BS in chemistry, not biology, so forgive any screwups. The "primordial ooze" was composed of simple organic molecules that have been shown through experimentation to form in a low- oxygen environments (the early earth was indeed a low-oxygen environment). These molecules, given enough time, could form into self-replicating compounds that mindlessly copye themselves.

As for the formation of a cell, one popular theory suggests that these reactions took place in little blobs of organic goo (the way oil forms little blobs when poured into water). This is a PROTOCELL. The steps to a true cell would be incredibly small.

For a far better explanation of abiogenesis and the odds of all this happening is found on http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/abioprob/

Check out the rest of www.talkorigins.org too. Excellent source.


"Consciousness-lots of interesting new findings in this field, indicating the existence of the soul, seperate from the brain"


Please give me any books or web pages on this topic. I really do find it interesting.

However, from what I have seen so far, the brain and "soul" are the same thing. Brain damage has been shown to cause personality change. For example, google "Phineas Gage" and you will see what I mean.

Also, the idea of a soul and punisment is difficult to pin down too. Let's say I suffer brain damage and become a big, loud-mouthed jerk (moreso) but still maintain control over my actions. In my new form, I will commit more sins than before. Am I responsible for these sins to God? Am I new person entirely? If the accident wasn't my fault, why am I accountable for these actions? The line is very very blurry.


"Physics/Astronomy- the minute fine tuning of the universe and our planet in particular/the obvious interventions in our world, compared with the rest of space
and so on and so on etc. etc. "


Again, any sources would be greatly appreciated.

I'm not sure of any "obvious interventions in our world compared to the rest of space", but I ask you this: If the universe is fine-tuned for life, then why is life such a small part of it?

Also, fine-tuning is relative. Who's to say a different arrangement of universal conditions wouldn't yield life also? This type of tuning is very difficult to prove and has not been done yet.


"Evidence for the Christian God
History-the enduring and unprecedented legacy of a carpenter from a backwater in Israel"


I yield that a man named Jesus probably existed. However, other revolutionaries throughout history have survived obscurity to achieve greatness.


"the early spread of Christianity in a hostile environment"


Many religions survive hostile environments. Islam made it through the Crusades. Atheism made it to modern times too in spite of bitter persecuation. Religion survives like nothing else because it involves our eternal soul.


"the testimony of millions"


According to www.adherents.com there are 2 billion Christians. That means there are around 4.5 billion who are not Christian. No matter what, alot of people are dead wrong. In general, testimonial evidence is very untrustworthy.


"-the personal relationship alluded to in Pascal's Wager which holds that their is nothing to lose in giving God a shot and the sure knowledge that he exists, to be gained"


There is indeed a great deal to be lost by participating in Christianity. Money (tithes), time spend worshiping, earthly enjoyments. Also, if I chose the wrong branch of christianity, eternal punishment may await.

The biggest problem with Pascal's Wager in my opinion is the nature of belief. I can't simply UNBELIEVE what I believe. I can't just choose to pay homage to a god and still be honest with myself.


Again, I welcome you to the forum and hope you post here often.

I'm sure this post is full of type-o's etc. Just pretend I did it to be funny. Forgive me for the format here. I can't seem to get the quotes to work right. Blah.
 
"(the early earth was indeed a low-oxygen environment)"? There seems to be quite a lot of oxygen around these days. I wonder where it came from? If only there were someone with a BS in chemistry who could explain how that happened.
 
farmermike said:
I was a Christian,but attending a lecture and debate involving a YEC was more or less the straw that broke the camels back.I had to step back and reassemble a belief system,and I couldn't do it.
Did this happen before or after you got married?

Other farmermike:
I think my own understanding of it hinges on His forgiveness.
Isn't that more indifference than love? After all, I've never punished you for any of your sins. Does that show that I love you? Forgiveness isn't really about doing something for someone, it's about failing to do something against someone.
 
TeaBag420 said:
"(the early earth was indeed a low-oxygen environment)"? There seems to be quite a lot of oxygen around these days. I wonder where it came from? If only there were someone with a BS in chemistry who could explain how that happened.

Lemme go look....found one.

There was little free oxygen gas (as in O2) but a good amount of carbon dioxide. Most likely the early forms of life used CO2 rather than oxygen gas in their life processes. O2 is a common biproduct of such reactions. So early life made our form of life possible.

I'm going to go wipe your sarcasm off of me now.
 
jimmygun said:
I have asked this before on other threads but so far no reply. Can anyone demonstrate the "love" part of God. I honestly do not see a loving entity from the descriptions given about him.

There is a perfect example right near the beginning in Eden, which is well described in the quote:

"God loved his apples more than his children."

There you go.

A perfect example of god's love (of apples/fruit).

(Gen. 3:3 KJV)
 
TeaBag420 said:
"(the early earth was indeed a low-oxygen environment)"? There seems to be quite a lot of oxygen around these days. I wonder where it came from? If only there were someone with a BS in chemistry who could explain how that happened.

An article that explains it a little better than my first attempt: Oxygen from plants.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth's_atmosphere
The history of the Earth's atmosphere is only poorly understood prior to one billion years ago, but the following presents a plausible sequence of events. This remains an active area of research.

The modern atmosphere is sometimes referred to as its "third atmosphere", in order to distinguish the current chemical composition from two notably different compositions. The original atmosphere was primarily helium and hydrogen; heat (from the still molten crust, and the sun) dissipated this atmosphere.

About 3.5 billion years ago, the surface had cooled enough to form a crust, still heavily populated with volcanoes which released steam, carbon dioxide, and ammonia. This led to the "second atmosphere"; which was, primarily, carbon dioxide and water vapor, with some nitrogen but virtually no oxygen. This second atmosphere had ~100 times as much gas as the current atmosphere. It is generally believed that the greenhouse effect, caused by high levels of carbon dioxide, kept the Earth from freezing.

During the next few billion years, water vapor condensed to form rain and oceans, which began to dissolve carbon dioxide. Approximately 50% of the carbon dioxide would be absorbed into the oceans. Photosynthesizing plants would evolve and convert carbon dioxide into oxygen. Over time, excess carbon became locked in fossil fuels, sedimentary rocks (notably limestone), and animal shells. As oxygen was released, it reacted with ammonia to create nitrogen; in addition, bacteria would also convert ammonia into nitrogen.

As more plants appeared, the levels of oxygen increased significantly (while carbon dioxide levels dropped). At first it combined with various elements (such as iron), but eventually oxygen accumulated in the atmosphere — resulting in mass extinctions and further evolution. With the appearance of an ozone layer (a compound of three oxygen atoms) lifeforms were better protected from ultraviolet radiation. This oxygen-nitrogen atmosphere is the "third atmosphere".
 
Also, I apologize for including anything at all about my educational background. It is completely irrelevent. All evidence is based on its own merits rather than the identity of the person who presents it.

I put it in there with intention of showing that I know little about biology but instead I think I came off as a boast. I assure you, it was no boast. My lack of confidence in my own knowledge knows no bounds.

Edit: Nice post about the atmosphere evildave. Good stuff.
 
I'm not defending any thing here. I'm pretty lazy and skipped most of this thread. (it's late, and I should be going home from work to be with my wife and kids, not posting on an internet forum.) But I wanted to posit this:

All your lamentations about how horrible God is because of all the suffering in the world (undeserved death, hideous birth defects, etc.) could all be rendered meaningless if you just look at it a different way.

When you were a child and your parents sent you to your room for misbehaving (or spanked you, whatever worked in your household) it was devastating to you. Your world was over. You couldn't have candy, or what-not it was you did wrong. But your parents knew that their punishment was temporary and just, and in the long run, you would be better for it.

If our lives truly are eternal, than the mere 100 years we spend here is but a few minutes of our childhood.
 
BobM said:
When you were a child and your parents sent you to your room for misbehaving (or spanked you, whatever worked in your household) it was devastating to you. Your world was over. You couldn't have candy, or what-not it was you did wrong. But your parents knew that their punishment was temporary and just, and in the long run, you would be better for it.

If our lives truly are eternal, than the mere 100 years we spend here is but a few minutes of our childhood.

Of course, my parents weren't omnipotent nor omniscient and therefore punishment like this was the best way they knew to teach me to be better.

God doesn't have that excuse. Being omnipotent, he has the ability to make me better without punishing me. Therefore, the fact he doesn't indicates that he choses not to. There's a word for that: sadist.

Do you think if your parents could have taught you to be better without punishing you or devastating you they would have done it?
 

Back
Top Bottom