• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Another "Chi" demonstration

It has been well known for thousands of years.
Argument by unfounded assertion.

I thought you were supposed to be knowledgeable about logic, but that really is quite a basic logical fallacy.

What do you even mean by a 'hologram'? It doesn't seem to be what is normally meant by the term.
 
Last edited:
Hypernicus, are you the same person who posts as Hypernicus on the Astral Pulse forum?
He's Norwegian. I just found a number of norwegian debates where a certain Hypernicus argues the same A==A! stuff as here (in norwegian), and how AIDS is a man-made disease.

Isn't that so Hypernicus?
 
O...K. Since Google searches aren't evidence, perhaps you could just sum up, briefly, Bohm's arguments?
So you can ask questions by questions, till I could have written a whole book? I have no intensions arguing with people that lack a whole lot of knowledge about a subject.

Especially when one need philosophy to understand the reality. I am not talking about learning someones philosophy. There are not many philosophers in history worth reading as most of it is utterly rubbish. Philosophy is about the very ground of our existence, how we can gain knowledge from it built like a hierarchy, step by step without contrasts. http://www.importanceofphilosophy.com is an approved starting place.

And, of course, point to the evidence that it has been known for "thousands of years", while you are at it.
The observer observe. The experiencer experience. The thinker thinks.

If you lack knowledge here as well I will not write a whole book on this either.

But you are not going to get anywhere without actually testing your arguments in the real world.
The last thing I said on what you just replied on was: "No practice, no theory.". Before that I wrote: "Theory and practice are inseparable.". Can people not read on this forum?
 
Argument from tradition.
I have no intentions of writing books on this forum when I toss some statements. Read my previous post answering second quote. However if the replies are somewhat as I regard as intelligent I will continue posting on the subject(s).

Argument from ignorance.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeno's_paradoxes Here is why movement is impossible (the world is digital). There is only a smallest size something can be. Something can't be smaller and smaller endlessly on definite time, nor can something be so small that it do not longer exist. The world can be described as a screen like an example. Because it is dots that are turned on and off to make the illusion of movement. Another example on why the world is a
hologram. The calculations doesn't exist in the things itself, but in a dimension. The physical world is just an empty shell providing a movie before our eyes. Mass is an illusion, it is calculations that makes it the way we perceive it. If we zoom in on two domino bricks to see if the one touch the other to make it fall it will never do so. It will fall before it is touched. It is not the illusion picture that makes it move nor make the other brick fall, it is calculations. I refer to amongst other to the Aspect experiment and the movie clip. Quantum is energy of potential until it is observed and only then will it form energy of mass.

Argument from ignorance. Just because we don't know how to make it yet, doesn't mean we'll never figure it out.
Which atoms are you referring to from the Elements periodic table? What DNA can we mix for some mind to think "I exist"? It's like saying embryo have consciousness before the body is actually ready for a soul to enter. Abortion would be plain murder. The mothers have property rights over their own body and whatever that is in it as long as something doesn't have consciousness. The definition of a human being is to reason; thinking rational and logical.
An embryo can not to that. The soul doesn't enter a body until the body is ready to receive a soul. Human beings have property rights over their own body as long as the bodies have a soul. Soul is here the non-physical mind.
 
Please state the nature of the medical emergency.
Out of arguments turns to personal attacks, and always in a non-existence psychotic way.

Removed inappropriate comment.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Lisa Simpson


The word "psychopath" was removed from my post on this forum. People who don't want to know what psychopath is or they do, but censore it are supporters of A==A!, the root of all evil.

Some words that fit in after this:

"Wherever they burn books they will eventually burn people."

"One definition a day keeps the evil away."
 
Last edited:
The evader evades.
In a hierarchy it comes after my statement, not before nor in same line.

One can observe the evading, one can experience the evading, one can think evading. Besides the mind has nothing to do with being an evader.
 
He's Norwegian. I just found a number of norwegian debates where a certain Hypernicus argues the same A==A! stuff as here (in norwegian)

He's puerile and obnoxious there, too. Claims the universe is a hologram and appears to be arguing for creationism, and uses an animal from Southern India as an example. (The online Norwegian-to-English translator is very uneven). Lots of posts involving computer programming.

The Norwegian Hypernicus uses the flag of India as his avatar just like the Astral Pulse Hypernicus. I think they are the same. Could this be an Indian in Norway?
 
The universe is a hologram.
What definition of hologram are you using, because what you said doesn't make sence in the normal definition of the word, what exactly are you trying to say here.

Our minds exists in a non-physical dimension.
In what non-physical dimension?

The mind has been explained without the need for a non-physical dimension.

occam's razor would say that we should go for the explanation without the need for a non-physical dimension.

Here is where the flock-mentality forms.
what are you refering to with "here"?

Why is there a need to explain flock-mentality differently than it has already been explained?

How would your explanation be better when considering occam's razor?

Sincerely
Tobias.
 
Last edited:
He's puerile and obnoxious there, too. Claims the universe is a hologram and appears to be arguing for creationism, and uses an animal from Southern India as an example. (The online Norwegian-to-English translator is very uneven). Lots of posts involving computer programming.

The Norwegian Hypernicus uses the flag of India as his avatar just like the Astral Pulse Hypernicus. I think they are the same. Could this be an Indian in Norway?
Maybe, but he writes fluent norwegian, at least. I wondered what that flag was doing there too.
 
So you can ask questions by questions, till I could have written a whole book? I have no intensions arguing with people that lack a whole lot of knowledge about a subject.

Why are you here, then, if not to share your knowledge?

Especially when one need philosophy to understand the reality. I am not talking about learning someones philosophy. There are not many philosophers in history worth reading as most of it is utterly rubbish. Philosophy is about the very ground of our existence, how we can gain knowledge from it built like a hierarchy, step by step without contrasts. http://www.importanceofphilosophy.com is an approved starting place.

Oh, brother. Please don't tell me you are one of these half-educated loners who think they have discovered the Holy Grail of Wisdom, just because they are able to spell Heidegger.

If you want to pit your wits against people here, you should know that you will be challenged, in ways you probably not have experienced before.

The observer observe. The experiencer experience. The thinker thinks.

And the skeptic seeks answers.

If you lack knowledge here as well I will not write a whole book on this either.

If you won't explain it, then I won't understand.

If you can't explain it, then you don't understand.

The last thing I said on what you just replied on was: "No practice, no theory.". Before that I wrote: "Theory and practice are inseparable.". Can people not read on this forum?

Practice is not necessarily performing scientific experiments. Practice can also be merely repeating e.g. cold reading, or pretending to see auras.
 
Have you read or seen any videos with Jiddu Krishnamurti (and J Krishnamurti and David Bohm)?

I am pestered on a daily basis with demands from woos that I look at their stuff. My time is limited, so please explain why I should spend time on this. What will I learn, exactly?

Cantankerous.

That's nice. Care to address the point?

Why are you here, then, if not to share your knowledge?
 

Back
Top Bottom