Accusations against Silverstein

Still no takers?

Come on, "truthers" - take a shot at responding to the OP.

1) List crimes you accuse Larry Silverstein of
1A) Present evidence of Silverstein's guilt
2) Critique these accusations and evidence
Click to expand...
You know you want to.
 
RedIbis conceded (by vanishing) on the other thread that conspiracy liars are not capable of formulating in words the dark deed that Silverstein is supposed to have perpetrated. Let's close the book on this nonsense.
 
pomeroo said:
RedIbis conceded (by vanishing) on the other thread that conspiracy liars are not capable of formulating in words the dark deed that Silverstein is supposed to have perpetrated. Let's close the book on this nonsense.
Click to expand...

So why continue to post and taunt me?
 
Redibis ANSWER THE OP or vanish like you did previously!
Dont be a DJ!
 
Last edited:
Bobert said:
Redibis ANSWER THE OP or vanish like you did previously!
Dont be a DJ!
Click to expand...

Wow, that's really threatening. I feel so threatened, what should I do? I know, I'll have another sip of coffee and chuckle at your bluster.

Let's remember Pom taunted me in a thread I didn't even participate in. Kind of low, don't you think?
 
Well, the catch with sticking your head in the sand and pretending this thread doesn't exist is the next time you or another CT brings up Silverstein, you'll no doubt get directed back here and reminded of your inability to formulate a coherent argument.
 
Bobert said:
Redibis ANSWER THE OP or vanish like you did previously! Dont be a DJ!
Click to expand...
RedIbis said:
Wow, that's really threatening. I feel so threatened, what should I do? I know, I'll have another sip of coffee and chuckle at your bluster.
Click to expand...


That’s a bit weird. Why are highlighting the unthreateningness of a post that was clearly never intended to be threatening?
 
Last edited:
Please stop bickering - address the topic, or don't post.
Any comments on the OP?
 
RedIbis said:
So why continue to post and taunt me?
Click to expand...


Actually, I wasn't taunting you. You are certainly a cut above the other twoofers in civility and intelligence. If you can't express the case against Silverstein, then let's agree that there is none.
 
pomeroo said:
Actually, I wasn't taunting you. You are certainly a cut above the other twoofers in civility and intelligence. If you can't express the case against Silverstein, then let's agree that there is none.
Click to expand...

I've expressed my opinion that I think Silverstein is lying through his dentures. As far as I know, this is not a crime. This was on PBS, not under oath.
 
Last edited:
RedIbis said:
I've expressed my opinion that I think Silverstein is lying through his dentures.
Click to expand...


Yes, you think that he is lying, which reminds me that you never answered a question I had for you.

RedIbis said:
Silverstein is telling the unnamed commander what the smartest thing to do is. Funny, I'd defer to the commander to tell me what the smartest thing to do in a building fire is. Either way you look at it, Silverstein is lying through his dentures.
Click to expand...
Par said:
In what way was Silverstein telling the Fire Department what the best plan would be (even if that was what he was doing) an example of him lying?
Click to expand...


You kept ignoring it; I asked it around three or four times.
 
1337m4n said:
These are the purposes of this thread:

1) List crimes you accuse Larry Silverstein of
1A) Present evidence of Silverstein's guilt
2) Critique these accusations and evidence
Click to expand...

619745a54bbe44f13.gif
 
Dave Rogers said:
Hang on. What are you claiming Silverstein was lying about on PBS?

Dave
Click to expand...

Indeed, RedIbis. Depending on what you think Silverstein was lying ABOUT, you may be implicitly accusing him of a real crime.
 
RedIbis said:
I've expressed my opinion that I think Silverstein is lying through his dentures. As far as I know, this is not a crime. This was on PBS, not under oath.
Click to expand...


As other posters have noted, you keep tap dancing. What is the nature of Silverstein's lie? Really, you need to flesh this out for us. If he's not simply agreeing with the FDNY's assessment of WTC 7, what is he doing?
 
Par said:
RedIbis?

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3593817&postcount=33
Click to expand...


Don't expect an answer. He's gone. This particularly nasty, vaguely (sometimes overtly) anti-Semitic smear of a completely innocent man has been exposed. The FDNY informs the owner of building 7 that the firefighting operation is being suspended, and the owner, citing the terrible loss of life that day, agrees that it's probably the smartest thing to do. How it is possible to weave a fabric of falsehoods out of such an innocuous exchange is something only agenda-driven crackpots can hope to understand.
 
but strange enough when the truthers asked him about he did not talk about it.
Click to expand...
What's strange to me is he had enough restraint not to suggest to them they should go procreate with their mothers. :p
 
parky76 said:
truthers dont need evidence. only accusations. just like the nazis, the bolsheviks, the grand inquisitors, the puritans, etc etc.

next they will accuse Larry of witchcraft. if he is not a witch...he will drown. if he is a witch..he wont drown.
Click to expand...

If he weighs the same as a duck, he is a witch.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom