A Guide Through Common 9/11 Conspiracy Theories: WTC, Pentagon, Flight 93, Hijackers

[Kiwiwriter]

Perhaps...

Oh yeah!
Franklin's rod was 3" rebar, wasn't it?

Only Franklin's mistresses know for sure.

 

[boloboffin]

Greyl has posted this over at DU, and you would just be amazed at the response:

http://www.democraticunderground.co...mesg&forum=125&topic_id=145530&mesg_id=145530

Hide your strawmen before you click over, they are getting a thrashing. Be sure to check out the actual attempt to find fault with one of the arguments (hijackers in strip clubs). High hilarity!

 

[ref]

Greyl has posted this over at DU, and you would just be amazed at the response:

http://www.democraticunderground.co...mesg&forum=125&topic_id=145530&mesg_id=145530

Hide your strawmen before you click over, they are getting a thrashing. Be sure to check out the actual attempt to find fault with one of the arguments (hijackers in strip clubs). High hilarity!

Thanks for the link! I can't wait to see how that developes

 

[boloboffin]

Thanks for the link! I can't wait to see how that developes

It's incredible. Our intrepid CTer, HamdenRice, has chosen hijackers in strip clubs. Hamden (girl or boy? don't know) quotes the "in brief" argument, but not the supporting links. Hamden then mocks the idea, and goes on a small rant about James Randi.

I post the actual links, and quote that fascinating dialogue between the Muslim scholar and the Aljazeera reporter, who is hardly a Western plant.

Hamden first denies that the links have ANYTHING to do with the argument, and then shrieks over and over about how James Randi can bend spoons, and how I'm getting my information from a MAGICIAN!

It is a wonderful thing you have done here, ref. Thanks so much.

 

[ref]

It's incredible. Our intrepid CTer, HamdenRice, has chosen hijackers in strip clubs. Hamden (girl or boy? don't know) quotes the "in brief" argument, but not the supporting links. Hamden then mocks the idea, and goes on a small rant about James Randi.

I post the actual links, and quote that fascinating dialogue between the Muslim scholar and the Aljazeera reporter, who is hardly a Western plant.

Hamden first denies that the links have ANYTHING to do with the argument, and then shrieks over and over about how James Randi can bend spoons, and how I'm getting my information from a MAGICIAN!

It is a wonderful thing you have done here, ref. Thanks so much.

That's a classic. First a handpicked quotation that makes the impression I just made things up. When properly corrected, follows the denial. After the denial comes the rant about all the things that have nothing, nothing to do with the original subject, or anything else for that matter.

Thanks bolo. I'm glad if this further helps to show CTers lack of arguments and evidence.

 

[MG1962]

Hah, thanks for this maccy. They teach British English in our schools. And I agree, standards of spelling and grammar are much higher among debunkers.

We use s down under as well. Though z can be substituted

 

[boloboffin]

WilliamSeger, a poster here and at DU, put this sobering picture together. I thought it should be here for future reference.

 

[Pardalis]

Please mods, could you put this thread in the stickies?

 

[The Demon's Head]

Please mods, could you put this thread in the stickies?

I second that. This thread would be quite useful to the one's who are unsure on what to believe.

 

[ref]

I put the contents of this post on a website. That way everything can be easily updated. I may launch something else, or a bigger site in the future, but as of now this basic material can be found here.

http://www.freewebs.com/911guide/

 

[maccy]

I've added your site to the links page:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/local_links.php?catid=18#linkid122

 

[ref]

I've added your site to the links page:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/local_links.php?catid=18#linkid122

Ok that's fine I couldn't find it there though.. maybe it's my tired old eyes.

 

[Gravy]

Fantastic job, ref!

 

[david carmichael]

Splendid work, Ref!!

Is there anything you could hyperlink me to that I could import over to the "Pentagon FDR...." thread PERTAINING TO......

..... whether the "radar altitude" of 273 feet some TWO SECONDS before the crash was a "hard number above the ground" as claimed by CT Truther, JDX?

..and once again, ref... great job!

 

[gumboot]

[qimg]http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g171/boloboffin2/911/crater25.jpg[/qimg]

WilliamSeger, a poster here and at DU, put this sobering picture together. I thought it should be here for future reference.

It's not really very accurate though...

-Gumboot

 

[LashL]

I put the contents of this post on a website. That way everything can be easily updated. I may launch something else, or a bigger site in the future, but as of now this basic material can be found here.

http://www.freewebs.com/911guide/

Ref ~ the website looks fantastic, too! GREAT JOB!

 

[greyleonard]

It's not really very accurate though...

You know the drill: What's not accurate enough?
Plane too small?

 

[gumboot]

You know the drill: What's not accurate enough?
Plane too small?

It's mainly just that the position of the aircraft in relation to the ground doesn't in any way reflect the actual position of the aircraft moments before impact.

-Gumboot

 

[boloboffin]

To be fair, the picture was made to show how the airplane could fit into the crater. If the picture can be improved, I'd appreciate it.

 

[DarkMagician]

I put the contents of this post on a website. That way everything can be easily updated. I may launch something else, or a bigger site in the future, but as of now this basic material can be found here.

http://www.freewebs.com/911guide/

A little grammar note regarding Silverstein's comment: When you have enclosed quotations, you alternate double and single quotes.

Bob said, "Jenn said, 'Bill said, "Steve said, 'Too many people use too many quotes in sentences.'"'"