tsig
a carbon based life-form
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2005
- Messages
- 39,049
It does smell a little like canned meat.
I can almost make out the letters on the can (SPASM) i think.
It does smell a little like canned meat.
*snip*
Maybe we will be able to then understand what actually happened.
Ohhh boy.
Is this virtual 9/11 event going to be powered by the Unreal 3 engine? With Havok physics? That'll be fun.
WIth Michael Bay or Roland Emmerich to direct?
Actually, I'd go with Alex Proyas here. Despite the fact that 'Knowing' was filled with silly plot devices - MAN that movie sure blew up good.
I mean, I've seen major cities ****ed up by both of those directors multiple times - but I've never seen it jacked up like the end of 'Knowing.' That was...impressive. The visual effects in the movie are astounding. Too bad it didn't have a more cohesive narrative or it would have been a heck of a lot better.
If someone made this virtual 9/11, it would be filled with truthers and 4chan idiots, not the actual witnesses. This is a horrible way to get eyewitness testimony.
Both sides get a chance to tell their side of the disaster.
-
What makes you think there is more than one side?
You can try it and see for yourself while the rest of the human population thinks the idea is insane and the product of a severely oxygen starved mind.Why not try it and see
-
There is a lot of conspiracy theories out there on the web and with this virtual world of WTC there is a possibility for people to maybe see what actually happened.
Why not try it and see what it would look like and how people would prefer to see it.
Why not use our technology to try to see what happened.
Regards M.Sc. Magi
-
magi5,That is tru.
Everybody get a chance to make a virtual person connected to his IP number.
But when thousands of virtual individuals can be seen in the 911 disaster everybody will be able to filter out people as they want to see the event with the people they think is most trustworthy.
It will be able for everyone to see who where with people they knew and worked with and people who do not fit with a group of people because the other ones will go in and change theire story, if they know that a person who say he was there and they know he was not there and so on and so on.
Everybody wil get a chance to see the disaster as they want with the people they think are trustworthy.
And maybe one the filtered events, will just fall out as the best explanations of what really happened.
Lets say 911 truthers make one virtual 911 world and the other make one and then see what virtual WTC will be the best explanation of the disaster.
Both sides get a chance to tell their side of the disaster.
Its worth a try.
M.Sc. Magi
-
magi5,
Dont let ANYONE keep you down!
YOU are a visionary!
Are you familiar with the researchers Ted Logan and Bill Preston?
I am confident that they can help you!
Lets put something together!
Magi,
The only problem is, I cannot even tell you exactly where I was even down to the hour, let alone few minutes. The idea, while creative, is abunduntly bad.
I didn't look at my watch untill well into the evening. Heck, the only 3 times I can tell you exactly where I was at, was the second plane, (near WTC 1 lobby entrance) South tower coming down( Don't recall the street, but was not far from N tower lobby, and N tower, running for my life up up West street.
But, like I said, very creative.