• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

2000 Mules

This reads like a conspiracy theory, in itself. :rolleyes:
Exactly, because everything you claim is 100% true and you have absolutely no motive to lie. Why, you're just an impartial observer who just popped into this thread out of idle curiosity. No horse in this race whatsoever.


There is something nefarious to my intent, no doubt. Anyone can see that. I mean, how much more evidence does one need?
 
Last edited:
There is something nefarious to my intent, no doubt. Anyone can see that. I mean, how much more evidence does one need?

You conveniently clipped the part of my post that mentioned precedent.

Sorry, but if you dabble in conspiracy theories even a little bit, the stink is pretty hard to wash off.
 
You conveniently clipped the part of my post that mentioned precedent.

Sorry, but if you dabble in conspiracy theories even a little bit, the stink is pretty hard to wash off.


There is no precedent, despite your consistent presentation of my statements out of context, and assigning them imagined intent. Oh well, it's more fun this way, I guess. :)
 
There is no precedent, despite your consistent presentation of my statements out of context, and assigning them imagined intent. Oh well, it's more fun this way, I guess. :)

Hopefully the mystery of why this fake-umentary isn’t on Rotten Tomatoes won’t trouble you for as long as your completely genuine concerns about “long-term effects” of the Covid vaccine have.
 
Hopefully the mystery of why this fake-umentary isn’t on Rotten Tomatoes won’t trouble you for as long as your completely genuine concerns about “long-term effects” of the Covid vaccine have.


Uhh, I'm triple-vaxxed, bro. Any remote chance of potential long-term effects are of less concern to me than the risk of contracting covid.

I still would like to see this show up listed on RT. It is pretty odd that it hasn't, when you have stuff promoting Bob Lazar's ideas on there, for example. You would at least expect audience reviews. Maybe they don't want to give any recognition to this craziness, after the Capitol riot. As I say, lots of stuff shows up on there before any reviews are registered.
 
Uhh, I'm triple-vaxxed, bro. Any remote chance of potential long-term effects are of less concern to me than the risk of contracting covid.
Sure it is. :thumbsup: That's why you repeatedly brought up concerns of "long-term effects".

I still would like to see this show up listed on RT. It is pretty odd that it hasn't, when you have stuff promoting Bob Lazar's ideas on there, for example. You would at least expect audience reviews. Maybe they don't want to give any recognition to this craziness, after the Capitol riot. As I say, lots of stuff shows up on there before any reviews are registered.

It's a curated site. Not every turd trying to pass itself as a movie is necessarily going to be listed. This was already explained.
 
2000 Mules does follow standard conspiracy thinking.

For instance the “they are evil geniuses and evil morons simultaneously” schtick.
Why would the the people managing the illegitimate votes use workers from the campaign headquarters? There’s always a danger that one of the mules will be caught - therefore the mules should not be tied to the official campaign in any way. All the illegal stuff should be done at a small out-of-the-way office and use people who never even swing by the campaign headquarters. In fact, if possible, the mules shouldn’t even know whether the stuffed ballots are for Biden or Trump.
 
2000 Mules does follow standard conspiracy thinking.

For instance the “they are evil geniuses and evil morons simultaneously” schtick.
Why would the the people managing the illegitimate votes use workers from the campaign headquarters? There’s always a danger that one of the mules will be caught - therefore the mules should not be tied to the official campaign in any way. All the illegal stuff should be done at a small out-of-the-way office and use people who never even swing by the campaign headquarters. In fact, if possible, the mules shouldn’t even know whether the stuffed ballots are for Biden or Trump.
And why would these evil geniuses get caught on camera, in a location which was almost certain to have cameras, and where they would obviously know they would get caught on camera. It's almost like they WANTED to get caught on camera.
 
Originally Posted by Stacyhs View Post
If True the Vote said they have video of Biden and Clinton having Blood Marys made with real blood and sharing a Christian Baby charcuterie, there are some people who would believe it.

...and there are some who would deny it, even after viewing the authenticated video.

Sometimes it's better to say nothing at all; your sad retort is a classic example.
 
I watched a bit of it while on my exercise bike. My take is that it is pretty slickly produced and when they show the intricate routes that the "mules" purportedly took to various polling dropoff boxes, it looks pretty compelling. But there is an obvious problems with believing that it was all these people in the big cities (IIRC over half of the mules that De Souza identified were in Philadelphia), and that is that Trump generally did better in many cities in 2020 than he had in 2016, including Philly. What killed Trump was his dramatic loss of support in suburbia (including suburban Philadelphia).
 
I watched a bit of it while on my exercise bike. My take is that it is pretty slickly produced and when they show the intricate routes that the "mules" purportedly took to various polling dropoff boxes, it looks pretty compelling. But there is an obvious problems with believing that it was all these people in the big cities (IIRC over half of the mules that De Souza identified were in Philadelphia), and that is that Trump generally did better in many cities in 2020 than he had in 2016, including Philly. What killed Trump was his dramatic loss of support in suburbia (including suburban Philadelphia).

garbage in - garbage out.
The process might be beautiful, but when your base assumptions are demonstrably crazy, the end result will be nonsense.
But there are always those who let themselves get dazzled by a spiffy performance.
 
garbage in - garbage out.
The process might be beautiful, but when your base assumptions are demonstrably crazy, the end result will be nonsense.
But there are always those who let themselves get dazzled by a spiffy performance.

That is the concern. Like I said, you see the route one guy apparently took and it really looks suspicious. How many will say, okay that is one frigging guy and they picked him because he looks really suspicious if you ignore a few things and how many will say that's one frigging guy and he is one of thousands, and that is how Trump lost.

I am not seeing this movie being promoted on any of the sensible conservative websites on the internet, although I'm sure Hoft has pushed it on Gateway and Newsmax has reported it breathlessly. But I repeat myself.
 
If my sides cease hurting from laughing, how many people giving how many reviews produced those outcomes? You don't think that just possibly DeSouza or one of his team might be trying to inflate the figures to get more attention for this dross he has the nerve to claim is a documentary movie?
 

Back
Top Bottom