April Stundie Nomination thread

What's even better is one of the responses. I'm pretty sure everyone here will recognize this guy.


Ahhh, so that's where the old corndog (see my sig) is hanging out these days. Wait for the lawsuit against ColbertNation and 15 posters named Schmoe, 7, BobRalsamo, TryteLip, ChubbySidekick, et al in 5, 4, 3, 2...

:dl:
 
Last edited:
OMG! George Simpson! Now there's a blast from the past. Any guesses on when the lawsuit against Colbert Nation starts?



Here's some more from 7 that were brought up in another thread:

That said, what does it matter what I think? My thoughts are utterly irrelevant.

Again, you are focusing on the who, what, when, where, why and how. I don't care about them. I care about the events and the stories and the evidence. That's all for this discussion.

Who, what, when, where, why and how are utterly irrelevant for this discussion. NONE of that matters when examining evidence of events. Motive has nothing to do with execution. Even execution isn't relevant. All that matters is whether or not it happened as we were told.

That is ALL that matters.

The dude is just a Stundie Factory.
 
George Simpson - he's the only person on the internet who generates simultaneous cases of spontaneous dyslexia.


No, not dyslexia... that was deliberate. Those of us who were around during his brief stay here and who were involved in his silly lawsuit, call him George Corndog Simpson on purpose. :)
 
Please tell me no one got this bit of genius.
http://www.debatebothsides.com/show...wn-The-Elevator-In-Wtc1&p=1192106#post1192106

DBS forum Jay_Esbe said:
Obviously ALL the fuel was atomized and ignited on impact. But let us say the impossible DID happen, and "somehow" liquid fuel survived without being atomized OR ignited.

HOW THE ****,

1. can you get an inflammable liquid, away from the midst of a fire un-ignited.

A: YOU CAN'T.

2. If you DID, and it "ran down the elevator shafts" before igniting, any "explosion" would have been "global" throughout the shaft, resulting from vapor permeating the entire shaft. Liquids don't explode; they have to be atomized or vaporized and mixed with air. So if the fuel was running DOWN the elevator shaft ****miraculously not burning****, vapors would BEGIN at the top of the WTC shafts, and ignition of the vapors (and this has all been bloody impossible anyway) would have blown out every elevator door at every accessible floor because energy always follows the path of least resistance.

This was one of the most laughable claims made by the failed grammar school physics dupes. I invite anyone to throw a cup full of kerosene across a camp fire and into a bucket on the other side and let's see what they (a) get in the bucket, and (b) if the bucket's not burning. *********** HILARIOUS stuff.

I guess these dupes must get double their money's worth of the 4th of July, being able to light used gun powder twice.
 
Here's some more from 7 that were brought up in another thread:

Again, you are focusing on the who, what, when, where, why and how. I don't care about them. I care about the events and the stories and the evidence. That's all for this discussion.

The dude is just a Stundie Factory.

:jaw-dropp


blithely unaware he has contradicted himself in the space of three sentences...
 
What's even better is one of the responses. I'm pretty sure everyone here will recognize this guy.

lol, the good old times. His 30 years of research debunked in 30 seconds :D

Eta: That 7 guy, is he for real??
 
lol, the good old times. His 30 years of research debunked in 30 seconds

Eta: That 7 guy, is he for real??

He is indeed for real. I just posted a few more of his gem/dingle berries over at the other thread here on forums.randi.org. Check 'em out.

forums.randi.org/showthread.php?p=5832161#post5832161
 
Ahhh, so that's where the old corndog (see my sig) is hanging out these days. Wait for the lawsuit against ColbertNation and 15 posters named Schmoe, 7, BobRalsamo, TryteLip, ChubbySidekick, et al in 5, 4, 3, 2...

:dl:

OMG...did he really try to sue JREF for 20 million dollars for having his thread moved to AAH? Wow...just wow.
 
I'm sorry, this one isn't by a twoofer, but rather about them.
Still, I believe it lives up to the spirit of Stundieliciousness.

Here, Cicero makes the statement:
... or if you consider Bush 43 a simpleton or a Machiavelli, it still makes you a troofer.
 

Back
Top Bottom