Can I attempt making two points?
1) Derren Brown as the British James Randi??? Derren has, notwithunderstaning his oft repeated claims that he does not use paranormal tricks, done more to revive the belief in NLP, photographic memory, mind reading, subliminal suggestion etc., witness the discussion-sections of some of his YouTube videos.
Good luck to him as an accomplished performer, but a promoter of sceptical thinking he is not. If he wants to reveal some of his 'scams' (just one of two): how did he for instance manage to create the impression that he managed to learn the Oxford English Dictionary by heart in 20 minutes and a randomly selected book from the Reading Room in the British Library in 5 minutes?
Why is the relevant video (check ‘Photographic Memory Derren’ on Google) blocked in the UK? Because it may interfere with his British Theatre Tours?
Is he going to reveal some of his scams in this ‘Science of Scams’ Series? Richard Wiseman would have been a better ‘curator’ of this series, but he hasn’t got the pulling-power Derren is assumed to have.
2) The Science of Scams series is based on the wrong premise: One does not need to understand how a scam works to avoid falling for it: Recognising a scam is the important thing (there are usually several ways of working the ‘scams’ (?illusions) in this series). If someone claims s/he can read peoples mind, predict the future, move objects by mere power of thought, make a elephant disappear from stage or cut a lady in half: it’s a scam, a trick, an illusion and I don’t need to know how it’s done. If it’s part of magic show I enjoy it as entertainment, and might wonder how it’s done, but I know in any case that’s it’s a scam.
BTW: What we need is a programme 'Science of Gullibility - how people are fooled'
BTW 2: Derren got a lot of money for curating the producers of the ‘Science of Scams’ producers – is this a scam?
SleuthM