Cellular Memory in Organ Transplants

RSLancastr said:
According to Sylvia Browne, not only is there such a thing as cellular memory, but we have cells in us whih contain memories from our past lives!

Birthmarks, for example, are often located where a person was stabbed, shot, or hit with an arrow in a past life.
Click to expand...

Now I'm wondering why one of my past lives was stabbed or shot right next to his scrotum.

Actually I think I have a pretty good idea.
 
RSLancastr said:
Birthmarks, for example, are often located where a person was stabbed, shot, or hit with an arrow in a past life.
Click to expand...

godless dave said:
Now I'm wondering why one of my past lives was stabbed or shot right next to his scrotum.

Actually I think I have a pretty good idea.
Click to expand...
Hmm. All my life I've had a large mole on my ankle. Hey, I think I may have been Achilles in a past life!
 
Blood or any transplant carry memory from the donor, every cell has it all. That is why the Seven Day Adventist won't have blood transplants. If a blood donor had a trauma perhaps it would make the recipient uneasy, I have heard quite a few stories and it's the quantum connection between every living cell.
 
Old Bob said:
Blood or any transplant carry memory from the donor, every cell has it all. That is why the Seven Day Adventist won't have blood transplants. If a blood donor had a trauma perhaps it would make the recipient uneasy, I have heard quite a few stories and it's the quantum connection between every living cell.
Click to expand...

That post is nonsense. All of it.

That blood or implants carry any memory is unconfirmed and highly unlikely.

Every cell does not have all your memories (if it did, brain trauma would not make you loose memory).

No that is not the reason that certain sects reject tranfusion. The reason is their interpretation of certain passages in the OT.

It has nothing to do with quantum entaglement.

Four blatant errors in six sentences. That is not bad at all, but it is far from the forum record (which IIRR is three errors in one sentence, held by Franko). Do keep trying, though.

Hans
 
* woo * I remember this cell memory idea was big a few years ago when Claire Sylvia wrote A Change of Heart, which got made into a TV movie. She had a heart-lung transplant and believed she began to experience food cravings and personality changes which she later learned were identical to those of the young man whose heart/lungs she'd received.

So then people began to write books claiming not just that all cells have memory, but that the heart in particular has memory and some means of having an impact on personality, so that some type of personality change follows a heart transplant. * end woo *

How is it possible for the heart to encode memory? How is different from believing the stomach could encode memory, and how would the stomach encode or store memory? If all memory or, let's say, personality characteristics, are somehow stored in the DNA, then why would people lose any function at all, or why would people experience personality changes, when their brains are damaged? Shouldn't they be able to pull from the memory stored in the DNA in the rest of their body, or their hearts in particular?
 
Old Bob said:
Blood or any transplant carry memory from the donor, every cell has it all.
Click to expand...
Poppycock! If that were true, as MRC_Hans points out, memory loss through brain trauma would be virtually unheard of.

Not to mention, all the "cells" people consume every day from beef, poultry, seafood, plants, etc. If cellular memory transfer were possible, you'd have an entire planet full of people "remembering" their life as "Betsy", "Charlie the tuna", or that stalk of corn that grew in Iowa.

Old Bob said:
That is why the Seven Day Adventist won't have blood transplants.
Click to expand...
Umm...really? Not according the the Seventh-day Advestists:
Seventh-day Adventist website said:
Most Adventists will donate blood for others, and personally accept a blood transfusion if it is deemed necessary for their health care.

For more than 100 years, Adventist hospitals worldwide have used blood transfusions as needed for medical purposes.
Click to expand...

Old Bob said:
If a blood donor had a trauma perhaps it would make the recipient uneasy, I have heard quite a few stories and it's the quantum connection between every living cell.
Click to expand...
Stories are hardly proof of anything, other then gullibility and over active imaginations.

There is exactly zero proof/evidence to suggest cellular memory transfer exists or is even possible.
 
Last edited:
Ok, memory is all in our brain? how do you account for instinct in animals passed on even when they have no contact with parents or like kind. This thread is touching on the spiritual cellular connection that most church going people can't handle. After a life time of brainwashing we get from the pagan sun god worship mob any thing outside boundaries set by our controllers is so hard to take on board. I do understand and I am not trying to offend anyone. We live in a type of hologram and every living cell has a benign connection to one another. I couldn't even start to prove this to you lot and for the record I don't smoke dope.
 
Old Bob said:
Ok, memory is all in our brain? how do you account for instinct in animals passed on even when they have no contact with parents or like kind. This thread is touching on the spiritual cellular connection that most church going people can't handle. After a life time of brainwashing we get from the pagan sun god worship mob any thing outside boundaries set by our controllers is so hard to take on board. I do understand and I am not trying to offend anyone. We live in a type of hologram and every living cell has a benign connection to one another. I couldn't even start to prove this to you lot and for the record I don't smoke dope.
Click to expand...
Umm...you answered your own question; it is called instinct
American Heritage Dictionary: [i]instinct[/i] said:
An inborn pattern of behavior that is characteristic of a species and is often a response to specific environmental stimuli: the spawning instinct in salmon; altruistic instincts in social animals.
Click to expand...
Instinct has nothing to do with cellular memory supposedly passed through organ transplant or blood transfusion.
 
Last edited:
Essentially, instinct is genetic inheritance of behaviour. Organisms which exhibited specific behaviour patterns tended to survive longer and leave more offspring, which also inherited those behaviour patterns. It's actually quite an interesting crossover between genetics and behaviour, and well worth a discussion of its own.
 
One of the means of cell memory may be carried in the so called junk DNA. Some think that it is a preserved recipe for a hu-man body, what else would last eons. I think it is both. As I have said before all living cells are connected. A naturopath we know gets a response from patient hair and in one case she had a patient die so she went back to the hair sample to try and find out why only to find the hair sample had died with the patient. This woman has hundreds of samples and has found out response dies with the patient no matter how far away, so I think that is a good argument for the knockers.
 
Old Bob said:
One of the means of cell memory may be carried in the so called junk DNA. Some think that it is a preserved recipe for a hu-man body, what else would last eons. I think it is both. As I have said before all living cells are connected. A naturopath we know gets a response from patient hair and in one case she had a patient die so she went back to the hair sample to try and find out why only to find the hair sample had died with the patient. This woman has hundreds of samples and has found out response dies with the patient no matter how far away, so I think that is a good argument for the knockers.
Click to expand...

Hair is not alive to begin with, so I fail to see how a hair sample could "die" with a patient.

Your naturopath, if actually practicing, is a danger to her patients.
 
Old Bob said:
One of the means of cell memory may be carried in the so called junk DNA. Some think that it is a preserved recipe for a hu-man body, what else would last eons. I think it is both. As I have said before all living cells are connected. A naturopath we know gets a response from patient hair and in one case she had a patient die so she went back to the hair sample to try and find out why only to find the hair sample had died with the patient. This woman has hundreds of samples and has found out response dies with the patient no matter how far away, so I think that is a good argument for the knockers.
Click to expand...
Naturopathy really has nothing to do with cellular memory transfer and should have it's own thread.
 
Old Bob said:
One of the means of cell memory may be carried in the so called junk DNA. Some think that it is a preserved recipe for a hu-man body, what else would last eons.
Click to expand...
No.

Some of the junk DNA is actually deactivated genes that are never expressed. A large part of it though consists of absolute genetic nonsense. Like 500 repetitions of "GCATGCATGCATGCAT". That stuff doesn't code for anything. That's why it's called "junk".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom