The PentaCon's Success

jhunter1163 said:
Supposedly, if the plane flew south of the Citgo, the path of damage inside the Pentagon would be different from what is observed (different approach angle). North of the Citgo supposedly proves that the observed damage was caused by preplanted explosives, not by a plane impact.

Or something. Reading that stuff makes my brain hurt.
Click to expand...

Ahhhh... I actually hadn't heard about the pre-planted explosives stuff, I thought they were going for a "missile-attack" scenario. Would the approach angle really differ so much it would make significant difference when it comes to damage to the building?

/S
 
Minadin said:
Not the damage inside the pentagon, rather the light poles and taxi cab which were damage outside along the flight path.

Their claim seems to be that if the plane flew north of the citgo then it couldn't have damaged the poles / cab . . . and therefore that damage was planted / staged somehow. I still can't figure out how exactly that translates into the plane flying over instead of hitting.
Click to expand...

You're right, Minadin, but I think they claim both (hence their use of the damage plot inside the Pentagon on their homepage).

Either way, it's nonsense.
 
Oh, and this thread got me browsing both LCF and PFTF and I found this thread from feb, 10:

Merc@PFTF said:
So let's see, we've got the Citgo Video, Doubletree video, Mike Walters response, new Lloyd interview.

Interesting timing.
Click to expand...

Is Merc implying that The Great Conspiracy is planting more false witnesses and evidence in reply to the ever-growing force of the Truther-movement? (Oh, and the article he is referring to was from sept, 12 last year. Not that "new")

Cheers,
SLOB
 
Last edited:
jhunter1163 said:
You're right, Minadin, but I think they claim both (hence their use of the damage plot inside the Pentagon on their homepage).

Either way, it's nonsense.
Click to expand...


[lytemode] "We have earthshattering evidence!" [/lytemode] :D
 
What I love about this is that now the majority of the respondents on the board believe that a plane hit the Pentagon.* Perhaps Lyte and Merc are COINTELPRO?




* - Obviously this isn't a scientific poll so we don't know who's responding. But still...
 
Minadin said:
Not the damage inside the pentagon, rather the light poles and taxi cab which were damage outside along the flight path.
...
I still can't figure out how exactly that translates into the plane flying over instead of hitting.
Click to expand...
Actually, they're saying both. If the plane flew North of the Citgo, then there's no way it could have damaged the light poles, so they had to have been staged. And if the plane came from that direction instead of the more southerly one, the interior pattern of damage in the Pentagon could not have happened, because all the damage points back at where the light poles are. Therefore, the plane did not hit the Pentagon, therefore it flew over.
 
CurtC said:
Actually, they're saying both. If the plane flew North of the Citgo, then there's no way it could have damaged the light poles, so they had to have been staged. And if the plane came from that direction instead of the more southerly one, the interior pattern of damage in the Pentagon could not have happened, because all the damage points back at where the light poles are. Therefore, the plane did not hit the Pentagon, therefore it flew over.
Click to expand...

Thats it in a nutshell.
Its obvious when you think outside the box like Merc and Lyte.
 
And with the results of the poll at:

It flew North of the Citgo and over the Pentagon (100% behind The PentaCon) [9 votes] [10.23%]

It flew South of the Citgo and hit the Pentagon (0% behind TPC) [70 votes] [79.55%]

It flew North of the Citgo and hit the Pentagon (50% behind TPC) [4 votes] [4.55%]

It flew South of the Citgo and over the Pentagon (50% behind TPC) [1 vote] [1.14%]

None of these options/I don't know [4 votes] [4.55%]

Total Votes: 88
Click to expand...

IVXX invokes the mercy rule and locks the thread.

Another thread that's ran it's course. Locked.
Click to expand...

:dl:

Merc and Lyte can whine all they want, but the fact that they could not garner the support of more than 7 troofers to their cause on a troofer forum is very, very telling. (They got 9 votes but obviously at least 2 of those votes were their own.)

One would think that they would get the picture - which is that not even the vast majority of troofers believe their ridiculous theories or are persuaded by their crappy little video.
 
After all the BS Lyte spouted on this forum, I'm probably not the only one partaking in a bit of schadenfreude.
 
Last edited:
Looks like Balsamo has been banned by LCF.

Don't think he'll be getting a badge though.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom