MirageMemories: Care to discuss?

[beachnut]

The SS could not be expected to have rapidly reached the conclusion that the still developing 9/11 attacks were all part of a long range plan, and therefore 4 days advance knowledge of the presidential whereabouts would be insufficient time for suicidal terrorists to mount a plan of attack.

MM

No wrong again. The terrorist could not find the president with the rookie level of flying they had. They had to have big targets!

WTC 1300 feet tall! taget, yes idiots can hit that.
Petangon - my goodness he almost hit the ground, he almost missed one of the largest buildings in the world??? Flight 93 hit a big state - they could not even pick a target because they were afraid of the passengers.

The tiny school yard would have been hard to find. Plus you idiot CTers would have blamed Gore for getting Bush. You would still be a CT guy with no facts.

Make up a better story next time and get some facts to support you ideas on 9/11. Your posts at LCF are giving you a false level of support. They agree with almost any crazy idea. Have you read what they post over there? They use fake physics, they make up dumb ideas on 9/11 and you post the same here.

Try a better story based on facts next time. But you will leave and try to forget you have no facts or any ideas how 9/11 happen. Do you even have a fact story? Facts? (he will declare victory and leave as all CTers do; standard stuff for you CT man; miragememories is a good name for you and your 9/11 junk stories. irony)

 

[Miragememories]

Well I think it's time to take a break from you folks.

Your repetitious crap gets very boring and it's such a waste of time responding to your baiting when it's apparent most of you aren't interested in intelligent creative dialogue.

For most of you it's a goal of 'break' anyone that challenges your smug dogmatic beliefs.

Well my beliefs are certainly vulnerable, but not to lame attacks by those who sacrifice individual thought for the sanctuary of insults and hiding behind the published works of those whom they believe cannot be criticized.

I'll drop by in a couple of weeks when I get bored and you folks need another feeding.

MM

 

[LashL]

Well I think it's time to take a break from you folks.

Your repetitious crap gets very boring and it's such a waste of time responding to your baiting when it's apparent most of you aren't interested in intelligent creative dialogue.

For most of you it's a goal of 'break' anyone that challenges your smug dogmatic beliefs.

Well my beliefs are certainly vulnerable, but not to lame attacks by those who sacrifice individual thought for the sanctuary of insults and hiding behind the published works of those whom they believe cannot be criticized.

I'll drop by in a couple of weeks when I get bored and you folks need another feeding.

MM

Translation: I have no facts or evidence to support my conspiracy fantasist views, and you people insist on something more than my unfounded accusations of mass murder against innocent people. Since I cannot provide you with anything remotely resembling facts or evidence, and since I can offer nothing more the standard, tired, old, debunked nonsense that I parrot from conspiracy fantasist websites, and since I am not fooling anyone here with my pretence, I have to go back to the Loose With the Truth forums where they will believe that I've pulled something over on you folks, or, to use the lingo we like on the kiddy site, they will believe that I have "pwned" you. Time to go look for kudos from mental midgets, as I have no logical or critical thinking skills, and I don't need any over at Loose With the Truth.

 

[Arus808]

Well I think it's time to take a break from you folks.

Your repetitious crap gets very boring and it's such a waste of time responding to your baiting when it's apparent most of you aren't interested in intelligent creative dialogue.

For most of you it's a goal of 'break' anyone that challenges your smug dogmatic beliefs.

Well my beliefs are certainly vulnerable, but not to lame attacks by those who sacrifice individual thought for the sanctuary of insults and hiding behind the published works of those whom they believe cannot be criticized.

I'll drop by in a couple of weeks when I get bored and you folks need another feeding.

MM

yes, run away when you are cornered like a scare little rat. when posed with facts, that's all you cter's can do....

run away...run away...run away.

 

[Firestone]

Well I think it's time to take a break from you folks.

Your repetitious crap gets very boring and it's such a waste of time responding to your baiting when it's apparent most of you aren't interested in intelligent creative dialogue.

For most of you it's a goal of 'break' anyone that challenges your smug dogmatic beliefs.

Well my beliefs are certainly vulnerable, but not to lame attacks by those who sacrifice individual thought for the sanctuary of insults and hiding behind the published works of those whom they believe cannot be criticized.

I'll drop by in a couple of weeks when I get bored and you folks need another feeding.

MM

Another one bites the dust
Another one bites the dust
And another one gone, and another one gone



ETA: I now see we are not very nice ...

 

[A W Smith]

Your repetitious crap gets very boring and it's such a waste of time responding to your baiting when it's apparent most of you aren't interested in intelligent creative dialogue.

This isn't a creative writing class. We aren't writing scripts for some future TV fiction series here. Your claims need to meet the burden of plausibility that reasonably offsets best existing evidence. Don't you even get it? This is nothing but an agenda driven faith based religion for you.


oh i see hes left
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/7c/Bacall-to-Arms.jpg/250px-Bacall-to-Arms.jpg

 

[GlennB]

Well I think it's time to take a break from you folks.

Your repetitious crap gets very boring and it's such a waste of time responding to your baiting when it's apparent most of you aren't interested in intelligent creative dialogue.

For most of you it's a goal of 'break' anyone that challenges your smug dogmatic beliefs.

Well my beliefs are certainly vulnerable, but not to lame attacks by those who sacrifice individual thought for the sanctuary of insults and hiding behind the published works of those whom they believe cannot be criticized.

I'll drop by in a couple of weeks when I get bored and you folks need another feeding.

MM

No !! Don't go !! You haven't actually said anything about 9/11 yet.

 

[beachnut]

Well my beliefs are certainly vulnerable,

MM

The rest of your post is best described by the very words you used turned back to yourself; I left out that section.

Yes your beliefs are just made up stuff. What do you expect with no facts or evidence to support your disrespectful fiction. Dylan would love you to write for him. Ask him if he needs help making up stuff like he does in his videos. You both could be working on the next great fraud of the truth movement.

Well it looks like you won this contest of lies. Maybe one day you can win a fact filled argument. What do you think?

 

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

Don't let the virtual door hit you on the way out.

 

[stateofgrace]

Well I think it's time to take a break from you folks.

Your repetitious crap gets very boring and it's such a waste of time responding to your baiting when it's apparent most of you aren't interested in intelligent creative dialogue.

For most of you it's a goal of 'break' anyone that challenges your smug dogmatic beliefs.

Well my beliefs are certainly vulnerable, but not to lame attacks by those who sacrifice individual thought for the sanctuary of insults and hiding behind the published works of those whom they believe cannot be criticized.

I'll drop by in a couple of weeks when I get bored and you folks need another feeding.

MM

Oh di dums leaving so soon?

Repetitious crap? Yes I agree with you it is boring, so please stop doing it, you will thank yourself in the end.

Oh, my smug dogmatic beliefs? Yes you are again correct, they are actually based on facts, evidence and logic. I know it is difficult for you but please try and keep up.

When you drop by and grace us with your presence in a couple of weeks, please bring some facts with you, some sort of logical argument and something other than the absolute rubbish you have posted so far.

Farewell MM, bonvogue, oh you forgot this.

 

[ConspiRaider]

Well I think it's time to take a break from you folks.

Your repetitious crap gets very boring and it's such a waste of time responding to your baiting when it's apparent most of you aren't interested in intelligent creative dialogue.

For most of you it's a goal of 'break' anyone that challenges your smug dogmatic beliefs.

Well my beliefs are certainly vulnerable, but not to lame attacks by those who sacrifice individual thought for the sanctuary of insults and hiding behind the published works of those whom they believe cannot be criticized.

I'll drop by in a couple of weeks when I get bored and you folks need another feeding.

Repititious crap: Truth (the real McCoy, not "twoof") can be boring when it is finally revealed. And constantly pointing to it can be repititious. Whaddya gonna do? Now I know how the hotel desk clerks feel when guests ask: "Where the hell's the elevator?"

Creative dialogue: Certainly concepts such as "controlled demolition" and "Pentagon missile" and "Directed Energy Weapon" and "thermate" and "no planes" are creative, but as facades - nothing to support them - why would we engage in dialogue? They're bunk.

Dogmatic beliefs: Mostly, no, in this particular JREF forum. That works over in Politics or Religion but not here. Proof, evidence, fact, logistical viability, practicality: They pretty much rule the roost in the CT forum.

We're already missing you.

 

[T.A.M.]

Translation: I have no facts or evidence to support my conspiracy fantasist views, and you people insist on something more than my unfounded accusations of mass murder against innocent people. Since I cannot provide you with anything remotely resembling facts or evidence, and since I can offer nothing more the standard, tired, old, debunked nonsense that I parrot from conspiracy fantasist websites, and since I am not fooling anyone here with my pretence, I have to go back to the Loose With the Truth forums where they will believe that I've pulled something over on you folks, or, to use the lingo we like on the kiddy site, they will believe that I have "pwned" you. Time to go look for kudos from mental midgets, as I have no logical or critical thinking skills, and I don't need any over at Loose With the Truth.

Well said. I second the above motion...

TAM

 

[chipmunk stew]

oh i see hes left
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/7c/Bacall-to-Arms.jpg/250px-Bacall-to-Arms.jpg

 

[Foolmewunz]

I agree Foolmewunz! (snip)
MM

Oh, the shame! There's no rule that I have to use that in my sig, is there?

(Sorry, just a poor satirical example of quote-mining at its worst.)

MM, ..... I'm far from the most logical or calm person here! It's just that the NWO checks are late and I've got good meds left from last month. The others are waiting for their supply from Black Ops Central Command.

Truthfully, unless you come across as vile and reprehensible as KT and his ilk, or are a raving racist or anti-semite, I just prefer the death of a thousand cuts approach. It's something I learned from "kindly Doctor Welby" (aka REGNAD KCIN)..... Like most here, I'll be happy to take down one deluded argument at a time, but I'm in a different hemisphere from most, and by the time I wake up in the morning and can come play, the regulars and ninjas have generally already supped on you guys, and all I get to do is write an appreciatory post or throw in a snark-o-gram.

You didn't get what I was saying. It was sort of a last warning or a plea, if you will. You still have not posted a single fact or document or other resource than your opinion. As with Russell, the patience wears thin, and your little sabbatical is probably a good idea, 'cuz you're going to get unloaded on. Go hang with the paranoids for a while and bring a factoid or two when you come back.

Like I said, "Well that's not how I'd do it if I was the Secret Service,..." is going to only be debated with a series of "Oh, Yeah? Sez who?" arguments, because it's nothing but conjecture. As I said, Russell redux.

Is it just me, or is watching Hey Leroy vs MM like the Charles Barkley v. Barney bit on Saturday Night Live. (They wanted to have a rematch of the Barkley v. Godzilla commercial that was so popular, but on live TV. Unfortunately they couldn't make a deal with Godzilla's agency, so had to get the only other dinosaur available - Barney. Great bit.... Barkley did the kind of damage he used to inflict on other centers. Sort of what the heavily armed kitty kat is doing to MM.

 

[HeyLeroy]

No !! Don't go !! You haven't actually said anything about 9/11 yet.

Well, he did say the WTC security weren't in on the plot, but not necessarily not.

Oh, and the Secret Service should've done something something.

 

[uk_dave]

Or maybe, just maybe Davie lad, experts don't comment unless they were part of the process from the very beginning.

I'm forever amused by how often skeptics make the claim that if the story is wrong the professionals will come running, screaming "no way!"

The world I live in says people no matter what their stripe, do not contradict the establishment if they know it entails risk with no foreseeable benefit. Let the next guy be the hero.

I took engineering in college. Structural engineering was my best grade. I wouldn't for a moment expect people in the profession to challenge the NIST findings without some assurance that it wouldn't bite them in the ass.

Delude yourselves all you want but the fact remains few people are willing to stick their necks out against the establishment when it means risk to themselves, their families, their jobs and their friendships.

MM

Whoooa there sparky.

If your profession is impacted by a government report, you bet your little pinkies you have something to say on the subject!!

If the NIST findings were contrary to every Structural Engineers, Architects and Demolition experts perception of the events, they would indeed be screaming their dissent from the highest building, because they have to deal with the consequences of the inaccuracies.

Case in point:

The US govt has for a number of years now been in denial over anthropogenic global warming. Has the scientific community been quiet on this issue?

 

[Dave_46]

Well, now that he has run away, can I raise an off topic and totally inconsequential question that has been annoying me for years.

Why is the security force surrounding the President and others called the SECRET service. The whole world and his wife knows about it, so why is it called secret?

Dave

 

[ConspiRaider]

Well, now that he has run away, can I raise an off topic and totally inconsequential question that has been annoying me for years.

Why is the security force surrounding the President and others called the SECRET service. The whole world and his wife knows about it, so why is it called secret?

Dave

Need to know. Compartmentalization. Loose lips sink ships. Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead. Don't take any wooden nickels. That stuff. These guys show up for work every day and do what they're told, no questions asked.

There's only one person there who knows what they do - but it's a secret. Since the other two who used to have the secret are dead, he can't tell anybody.

 

[Stellafane]

Well, now that he has run away, can I raise an off topic and totally inconsequential question that has been annoying me for years.

Why is the security force surrounding the President and others called the SECRET service. The whole world and his wife knows about it, so why is it called secret?

Dave

What?!? There's a security force surrounding the president??

 

[chipmunk stew]

Well, now that he has run away, can I raise an off topic and totally inconsequential question that has been annoying me for years.

Why is the security force surrounding the President and others called the SECRET service. The whole world and his wife knows about it, so why is it called secret?

Dave

Great, Dave. Just tell the whole world, why don't you...

Now we'll have to call them the Used-to-Be-a-Secret-Until-Dave-Here-Opened-His-Big-Mouth-and-Blabbed-About-It-to-the-Whole-World Service.

Thanks a lot!