Spooked! Is At It Again

defaultdotxbe said:
i think hes secretly plotting to take over the world
Click to expand...
I think you're right, Default.

I think he wants, eventually, to turn us all into chickenwire images of ourselves (properly sandbagged, of course). Like playing "house", on a planetary scale.

A chickenwire fetishist. They're the worst, believe me...
 
ConspiRaider said:
I think you're right, Default.

I think he wants, eventually, to turn us all into chickenwire images of ourselves (properly sandbagged, of course). Like playing "house", on a planetary scale.

A chickenwire fetishist. They're the worst, believe me...
Click to expand...
i want my chicken wire image of myself to be paper mache
 
realitybites said:
I wish I understood his fascination with chicken wire.
Click to expand...

This is a rare affliction, but it has been observed before. At this point, it appears he is still studying the effects of fire on steel, but when he begins investigating the collapse mechanics, it's likely he will begin using other materials such as shaving cream, mashed potatos, and mud:

close.gif


As you can imagine, in its later stages this disorder can be very hard on other family members.
 
I'm glad they're so rational:

Pinch, another f*ckin spook, look at his site...the perps are getting desperate, soon the truth will be known by all...all ****in spooks must ****in die...justice for 9-11 will be served...we have to stop being nice with these people...declare war on the spooks!!!
Click to expand...

Alllllll righty then!


And then we have gems like this:

When facts, logic & physics are against you...ALL you CAN do is mock.
Click to expand...

Because I'm sure these people have read the entire NIST report and can offer detailed, mathematically sound reasons why it is incorrect. Or perhaps they simply looked at the "billiard ball" analysis and decided it was correct because it supported their preconceived notions about what "really" happened.
 
JonnyFive said:
I'm glad they're so rational:



Alllllll righty then!


And then we have gems like this:



Because I'm sure these people have read the entire NIST report and can offer detailed, mathematically sound reasons why it is incorrect. Or perhaps they simply looked at the "billiard ball" analysis and decided it was correct because it supported their preconceived notions about what "really" happened.
Click to expand...

They have truly forgotten the face of their fathers.
 
Ok, so the first thing wrong with the chicken wire construction is that different parameters scale up differently. The stregth of a column will increase proportional to the square of the cross sectional diameter of the column while the mass will increase proportional to the cube of the diameter.

So scaling down the diameter in direct proportion to the length of the column, the column gets proportionally stronger.
Elsewhere I saw calculations that , IIRC, state that he has loaded the structure with 1/200th of the compressive load that would account for correct scaling.

The shape of a column also has a lot to do with its structural properties. A solid cylinder will have greater shear strength than a box column and be able to bend without kinking to a greater extent than a box column.
 
jaydeehess said:
Elsewhere I saw calculations that , IIRC, state that he has loaded the structure with 1/200th of the compressive load that would account for correct scaling.
Click to expand...
thats pretty much what i came up with too, his structure was about 100-200 times denser than the actual towers
 
Sword_Of_Truth said:
Now Spooked is claiming he actually is an engineer.


- Spooked911
Click to expand...

Interesting. Although I don't think he actually claims in that quote to be an engineer; rather he insinuates that he has "some knowledge of engineering". I believe his silly blog says that he is some kind of biomedical "researcher", no mention of any engineering expertise.

His "some knowledge of engineering" probably comes from reading conspiracy whackjob sites, nothing more. The man is obviously unhinged.
 
defaultdotxbe said:
sure, check my sig for roxdogs debunking of NIST
Click to expand...

Well that does it, I'm totally convinced. He clearly shows a deep, fundamental understanding of the design of the towers and the physical elements of the collapse.

Is he one of the Death Beam crew, by any chance? They're especially divorced from reality.
 
beachnut said:
Gather Materials First (get something with Al, and something with Fe, steel)

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/12447457f33d274409.jpg[/qimg]


1. Build WTC model (Place can inside can)

2. Get aircraft simulator (bb gun will do, bbs look a lot like the nose of an aircraft)

WARNING
bbs could poke out your eyes​

CAUTION
bbs could damage your windows and house​

3. Pump up bb gun to simulate a 500 mph aircraft.

4. Fly bb into your model.


WARNING
bbs could poke out your eyes​

CAUTION
bbs could damage your windows and house​

5. Analyse your results. (bb went through steel can and al can and went on to make some noise further down the way, see warning and cautions)​

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/12447457f33d2c77b5.jpg[/qimg]​

6. Form conclusion.​

Present pee reviewed paper to the resident cats!​

Proof a model of an aircraft doing 500 mph will enter the model of the WTC. It also entered some other nearby objects (see warnings and cautions).​

When funding comes in we will continue the tests!​

Next experiment, how do we get fuel into our aircraft model?
Build better model of WTC.
Get better aircraft simulator.​
Click to expand...

It looks like no-one has yet asked the obvious question, so, What was the response of the resident cats?
 
dogguy said:
It looks like no-one has yet asked the obvious question, so, What was the response of the resident cats?
Click to expand...

They probably evacuated...so to speak.

Next question: What was the response of the owner of the property. Somehow I don't she said 'pull it'..... ;)
 
uk_dave said:
They probably evacuated...so to speak.

Next question: What was the response of the owner of the property. Somehow I don't she said 'pull it'..... ;)
Click to expand...

The cats did take off when they saw the aircraft propulsion simulator; the co-owner may never know of the simulation; pull it did play a part, but only due to the propulsion simulator requirements...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom