An open message to Killtown from an Old Friend of the Forum

Axiom_Blade said:
I was being sarcastic...oh well.
Those webpages that attempt to tar the entire left wing as frothing anarchists with some carefully chosen photos are pretty irritating.
Click to expand...

Those pics were all from the SF Bay area. I would say, at least from the times I have been there, that those sentiments are fairly represenative of that area.
 
Darth Rotor said:
Daniel Ellsberg is no whack job, nor was General (USMC retired) Anthony Zinni, nor is Naom Chomsky. (Though I do find his whining to be tiresome.)
Click to expand...

I could point out that the above statement is insaccurate; but what the heck, two out of three 'aint bad.
 
Bump.

For Killtown.

I don't know you (or your screen name), Hal, but your words gave me shivers. They reminded me that this business of debunking these maniacs who drool over the thought of exploiting the 9/11 victims and their families in order to squeeze every penny from people who prefer to be poorly informed is an important task.

Thanks for your very important thoughts.
 
Hutch - may I post Hal's words here in other forums? I think it's important for CTists to see these words, so they maybe will figure out that the goose chase they insist upon wasting their time with is actually personally insulting to a lot of people.
 
I agree with TK0001.

Honestly, i'm thinking of going on the offensive against them. As in, making a site showing the relationship to nazi thing. Give them some of their own poison, stoop to their level.

*grrr*
 
TK0001 said:
Hutch - may I post Hal's words here in other forums? I think it's important for CTists to see these words, so they maybe will figure out that the goose chase they insist upon wasting their time with is actually personally insulting to a lot of people.
Click to expand...


TK, you can PM him if you wish to ask for his permission-He's still listed here as Hal Bidlack. He may not want to become engaged that deeply and give the CT'ers reason to attack him directly--not that they would be likely to intimidate Hal, but the man does have some rights to privacy...

That said, it never hurts to ask respectfully.
 
I hate to post the experiences of others, especially in such a case, but perhaps it is okay in this case.

Our company had staff at the pentagon on 9/11. As it happens, they were in windowed offices right next to the strike point; just far enough away to have their office destroyed, but not to be killed by the fireball.

They saw it all. The hit, the explosion. They dragged people out. They saw burning corpses. Then they walked here (metro was shut down). They sat with us around a TV set, shaking. One just kept saying to the other: "(Name witheld), I haven't seen anything like that since Nam". War veterns, used to death and killing, shaking.

They saw it; it happened. They live with the aftermath every day.

CTers are scum. Forum rules prohibit me from expressing myself more directly.
 
Hutch said:
TK, you can PM him if you wish to ask for his permission-He's still listed here as Hal Bidlack. He may not want to become engaged that deeply and give the CT'ers reason to attack him directly--not that they would be likely to intimidate Hal, but the man does have some rights to privacy...

That said, it never hurts to ask respectfully.
Click to expand...

Thanks. I wouldn't think of using his name without permission. I'll have to think a bit more whether I want to actually do it. I just don't think it'll be effective to the Mark of the Beast crowd....
 
Hutch said:
Hutch again. For the many new people who have joined the JREF Forums, Hal Bidlack is a good and great friend of Mr. Randi and a staunch supporter of both the United States and skeptical thought. He has, for reasons in the past, decided not to post directly on the JREF Forums, a decision I respect but wish he would change, as you can see he has both intelligence, style, and something worth saying.
Click to expand...

I concur.

1. If you are arguing against Jay Utah in regards to the Moon Hoax, save yourself energy and surrender immediately.
Click to expand...

1b. If you are arguing against Buzz Aldrin in regards to the Moon Hoax, bring a mouthguard.
 
Darth Rotor said:
I'd like to see Buzz punch a few more, my self. The episode I saw on Youtube made me giggle with glee.
Click to expand...

As satisfying as it was, it was circumstances I should not like our National Heroes to have to undergo.

I'd much rather fool the Moon Hoax nutters into thinking they are going to get an ambush interview of an astronaut and end up in facing a gang of bikers.
 
kookbreaker said:
As satisfying as it was, it was circumstances I should not like our National Heroes to have to undergo.

I'd much rather fool the Moon Hoax nutters into thinking they are going to get an ambush interview of an astronaut and end up in facing a gang of bikers.
Click to expand...
Joe Foss had his Medal of Honor (in his bag) confiscated at an airport (IIRC, in Arizona.) as being a sharp object.

If that isn't a load of crap, what is? The TSA hire morons, and give them moron rules, and don't apply any sense to their jobs.

Enough about me, how much do we have to pay the bikers to do that ambush? It'd be fun to watch. Yes, I am a sick man. :p

DR
 
kevin said:
If that makes me a whackjob, at least I'll rest easy knowing that I can spell the word correctly.
Click to expand...

No, durng-nabbit! If it comes from whacko (right?), then it can be spelled either way.
The root seems to be w(h)acky.

"War makes people wacky." Doesn't seem right, somehow.
"War is whack." That's better. I'm gonna go off and make some t-shirts now.
 
Hmmm... "whack" is a euphemism for masturbation. As in Penn & Tellers comment "These people whack to tragedy." "Pull it" is also a euphemism for masturbation.

I'm starting to see a pattern here... Possibly even A CONSPIRACY!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom