If the question at hand is about whether some anonymous scientist voted Republican - it's pretty much a given that there are MAGA scientists. I'm not sure why that's even worth questioning. Of course there are. Much like there were Nazi scientists, despite somewhat similar attitudes towards science there.
Overall, scientists overwhelmingly support the Democratic Party - likely something like 9 to 1 on a quick check (because, simply speakingly, Republicans have been increasingly hostile to science, intellectuals, and so on), but, due to the sheer force of numbers, that certainly does leave leeway to seize onto outliers. That tendency to seize onto outliers is reasonably likely to make the outliers more likely to be "prestigious" for that matter, as right-wingers seek to parade them and give them personal incentives to say the things they they want claimed.
Going a bit further, I have a Tea Party friend who is a good chemist. He fairly certainly voted for Trump. His opinions on stuff outside of chemistry are often impacted by such bastions of credibility as Zerohedge, though, and he seems to consistently regurgitate right-wing BS that falls apart when subjected to even superficial real scrutiny. That includes more general science related claims, unfortunately, which very much does impact his overall credibility. Is he anti-science? Both yes and no for different inflections. On the one hand, he likes chemistry! On the other, he chose the path of sabotaging science in general and has often pushed fallacies that undermine science.
