You've completely misread my reply. I didn't say no one wants to end gay marriage. I was responding the claim that banning transgenders from female sports would be the first step in repealing "marriage equality," i.e., same-sex marriage.Lol no one wants to end gay marriage libtard. Anyway, here's why I think gay marriage should be ended.
If the event is "women's swimming", then that would exclude "children". Hope this helps!are child human females competing against adult human females?
He's using the word "woman" to mean person of female sex. In context this was not confusing at all. If your objection is that you want that word to be reserved for a different meaning then say that instead of telling him he's confused.you're confusing sex with gender
Then don't participate in the discussion, because other people do care.My position is I couldn't care less.
I somehow doubt the female athletes who are losing competitions to biological males think that this is all just right wing noise.It is only an issue because right-wingers know they have absolutely nothing to offer the American people outside of an "other" to attack.
Even the OP admitted this is just a way to roll back same sex marriage.
We don't have to pretend. They aren't.And lets not pretend interracial marriages aren't on the list.
No, he isn't confused. He's deliberately obfuscating.Poor Donal is confused about the meaning of the word "woman".
Counterpoint: Sauce for the goose.No, he isn't confused. He's deliberately obfuscating.
Of course, I'm talking about when they were in their prime, and I would've paid money to see that.
I don't think Larry would've had it as easy as some folks think.
I've seen them both play, live and in person, and I could see Sue kicking his a*** or at least holding her own.
-
In that case, you're hopelessly naive.
I'd rather be naive than stupid or filled with hate.
-
No hate or stupidity required; sports are segregated by sex for a very good reason.
Unfortunately, one of the major reasons is money, but I'd actually pay good money to see Caitlyn Clark go up against anyone in the NBA.
-
Money has little to do with it. The issue is fairness, which is why sports are segregated by sex in the first place. Why do you think nobody is complaining about transmen (i.e. women) in men's sports? Because they haven't a hope in hell of being able to compete, whereas even mediocre men would blow away the competition in women's sports. You can compare times in individual sports such as running, cycling, etc, and see where the best, gold medal-winning women would rank among the men.
It's really not even close. Remember the US women's soccer team (among the very best in the world) would practice against high school boys teams and get blown away with monster scores.
It's important to know WHICH sports people are expressing opinions on.
I feel sorry for trans women who are barred from competing in Athletics because there isn't a category for them at events.
I don't think they should compete against women (I'm a runner, and I know that men are almost always faster than women due to muscle composition, heart and lung size, etc), but I don't know what the solution is.
Some sports may find men and women more comparable in performance but I haven't researched anything other than running.
Nobody here believes than any man can beat any woman in any sport; that would be silly. Caitlin would whip me and probably most men in one-on-one basketball. But current NBA players? Not on your life.It seems like the sexist believe ANY man can beat ANY woman in ANY sport, and that's the major reason why I'm on the fence about trans in sports, because I don't believe that's true for every individual or sport, and I would pay good money to see Caitlin Clark (Indiana Fever, WNBA) compete against any regular NBA player, but some folks seem to think that wouldn't work or would be a disaster. I don't agree.
Nobody here believes than any man can beat any woman in any sport; that would be silly. Caitlin would whip me and probably most men in one-on-one basketball. But current NBA players? Not on your life.
After all, we've got over a century of competitive sports data that supports the conclusion that ANY male can beat ANY female in ANY sport.-
The ONLY person who has said anything like this is YOU.It seems like the sexist believe ANY man can beat ANY woman in ANY sport, -