Puppycow
Penultimate Amazing
It wouldn't be called racism
Oh, I suspect it would.
Of course, that would be technically incorrect, but that doesn't mean that people wouldn't say it.
It wouldn't be called racism
No we don't vote for senators. They are appointed basically for life, selected by the government of the day. (so you can have a senate composed of party hacks left over from decades ago.) It used to be more or less a direct selection of the prime minister/cabinet, but I think they have since created a committee to make recommendations.16/20 for Canada. I was really confused by the Senate one. You guys don't vote for Senators? What sort of madness is that?
Plot twist... The Australian test is all about "what Australian animals are dangerous and want to kill you".Here's the current Australian practice test, if you'd like to have a go:
https://immi.homeaffairs.gov.au/citizenship/test-and-interview/prepare-for-test/practice-test-new
(ETA: And yes, I got 100%, in case you were wondering.)
No we don't vote for senators. They are appointed basically for life, selected by the government of the day. (so you can have a senate composed of party hacks left over from decades ago.) It used to be more or less a direct selection of the prime minister/cabinet, but I think they have since created a committee to make recommendations.
On the other hand, our senate has very little real power. (It's not like the US, where your senate confirms judges and cabinet ministers, crafts bills, etc.) in Canada the senate largely functions to review legislation created by the house of commons. They might slow things down a little (which can mess up the government's plans( but it is rare that they would actually block anything.)
So our senators get full pay (with a housing allowance), guaranteed employment , and no real responsibility. Good work if you can get it
Plot twist... The Australian test is all about "what Australian animals are dangerous and want to kill you".
Which of course you should get 100% because the answer is "all of them".
At one point one of the questions on the Australian test was asking what Don Bradman's test average was.
Is there a correct answer to that?A poor 11 (given my wife is Canadian) but where was the question about which is the best Timbit to have with a Double Double, Eh?
100% too.Here's the current Australian practice test, if you'd like to have a go:
https://immi.homeaffairs.gov.au/citizenship/test-and-interview/prepare-for-test/practice-test-new
(ETA: And yes, I got 100%, in case you were wondering.)
You answered all of the Australian Values questions correctly.
Congratulations you have passed the Australian citizenship practice test.
The USAian kind until 1913?16/20 for Canada. I was really confused by the Senate one. You guys don't vote for Senators? What sort of madness is that?
You seem to think that the results would be different in the US. I doubt that many graduates of the public school systems in the US could pass the US citizenship test.
Here's the current Australian practice test, if you'd like to have a go:
https://immi.homeaffairs.gov.au/citizenship/test-and-interview/prepare-for-test/practice-test-new
(ETA: And yes, I got 100%, in case you were wondering.)
Yeah, it's a bit weird like that. You have to get 75% or better and 100% of the "Australian Values" questions. Because you missed one of the "Values" questions, it was a fail despite your good performance in the rest.I got 95% but failed!![]()
The curse of Emily's Cat strikes again!
It is a little odd. In the past they would often use the job of a senator as a "reward" for the party faithful.That still seems odd to me, but I guess it's not as bad when they don't have that much power?No we don't vote for senators. They are appointed basically for life, selected by the government of the day.
...
On the other hand, our senate has very little real power. (It's not like the US, where your senate confirms judges and cabinet ministers, crafts bills, etc.) in Canada the senate largely functions to review legislation created by the house of commons. They might slow things down a little (which can mess up the government's plans( but it is rare that they would actually block anything.)
Some people think that if you're living in Toronto, you're not really living "in canada".We had serious discussions about relocating to Toronto around 15 years ago. Mme Malbui had a firm job offer and I could have transferred with my then employer. We were both top of the scale on the immigration points scoring thing. In the end we didn’t go for a variety of reasons but I often wonder how our lives would have played out.
I'm surprised there weren't more questions about hockey.A poor 11 (given my wife is Canadian) but where was the question about which is the best Timbit to have with a Double Double, Eh?
Depends on your definition of "useless". You don't even believe that citizens have a civic duty to vote in elections, so I'm not sure that what you consider "useless trivia" is all that relevant.
Yeah, why know anything? Knowing stuff about stuff is pointless.You say that, but when was the last time you needed to know the capital of anywhere, or the land mass rankings of various nations, off the top of your head? Or at all, for any practical application? Never, that's when.
Yeah, why know anything? Knowing stuff about stuff is pointless.
: rolleyes :
Unless I'm considering emigrating to another country.A lot of times? Yes it is. Certain kinds of knowledge are useful. Like knowing where to find capitals of things if you need them. Knowing how to do certain kinds of math. The grammar of whatever language you're trying to use.
But you're reduced to sneering at me because you know I'm right. You know you'll never need to come up with the capital of anywhere off the top of your head. These citizenship tests are largely useless trivia. At best, they might be measuring whether you're sufficiently assimilated, using trivia retention through cultural osmosis as a proxy, but even that doesn't appear to be the case.