Sounds quite a bit like they aren't talking much skepticism. Here's a couple of the PhD students' dissertations:
How do those extracts support your claim?
Sounds quite a bit like they aren't talking much skepticism. Here's a couple of the PhD students' dissertations:
Sounds quite a bit like they aren't talking much skepticism. Here's a couple of the PhD students' dissertations:
How do those extracts support your claim?
I subsequently undertook independent research into classical, Arabic and mediaeval astrological knowledge/practice, whilst pursuing a career as a freelance astrological consultant/columnist for UK/European publications. Prior to joining Exeter University I was employed by the Sunday Mirror. In 2007 I was assisted by a grant from the Urania Trust for writing Horary Astrology Re-Examined: The Possibility or Impossibility of the Matter Propounded, published in 2009.
Three leading Adepts are case studies; Annie Horniman, Florence Farr and Moina Mathers. For these women their magical selves had more personal significance than their marital status. In these women, concepts of ‘The High Priestess’, ‘the Divine Feminine’ and the ‘Scarlet Woman’ may be perceived. Expanding on the work of Mary K. Greer, this paper will prove that marital status, financial independence and sexuality impacted on these women’s magical and mundane experiences in negative and positive ways.
It's definitely consistent with my prediction.
Yes, it was all very clearly spelled out in the stars.
And also in the published texts. I assure you my methods of clairvoyance are entirely mundane, and mediated by nothing more than the four fundamental forces of the Standard Model.
I don't see a problem with this.Anna Milon:
Thesis: The Horned God as Environmental Figure in Fantasy Fiction and Live Action Role Play.
I read that thing twice and am still unclear: are they studying this as history, as in the history of belief in the occult? Because that is a legitimate historical subject, studying what people in the past believed and what they did because of those beliefs, and how remnants of those beliefs live on.
Or is it a study of magic as if it were a real thing? Because that is silly.
It's the difference between a course on studying religions, and a course preaching those religions.
Sounds to me like it's sort of up to the student to decide.
Might be some interesting source material for an aspiring writer of the Fantasy genre.
Sounds to me like it's sort of up to the student to decide.
Might be some interesting source material for an aspiring writer of the Fantasy genre.
I don't see a problem with this.
Seems like the kind of thing academia is pretty good at sorting out itself. Funding and publication is a competitive process.
Good scholarship will get published in more reputable journals and lead to more funding or career advancement or prestige while dubious scholarship may get published in pay-to-play publications of poor reputation and lead to a career dead end.
That's because you haven't thought it through. Imagine being the professor who has to listen to a student talk about their D&D character for two hours, because it's their master's thesis.
What's the salary? It doesn't sound like a pleasant job, but if the pay is sufficient it could be endured. I'd rather do that than work in retail again.
It's definitely consistent with my prediction.
Sounds like you could CLEP the degree.
Also, chiming in that this is a bull **** degree for those who want letters after their names without being in a legitimate discipline.
I'd go so far as to say it's a bull **** degree for a specific kind of student whose magical thinking practices aren't getting enough validation, even from a typical liberal arts college.
Education is a business, you make money by offering the consumer what they want. Not all schools can literally afford to be academically rigorous.