• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Abbott Pardons Man Who Intentionally Murdered BLM Protester

shemp

a flimsy character...perfidious and despised
Joined
Nov 5, 2002
Messages
69,468
Location
The U.S., a wretched hive of scum and villainy.
Texas Governor Abbott plans to pardon man convicted of murdering BLM protestor

A US army sergeant and ride-share service driver has been found guilty of the murder of a protester during a Black Lives Matter rally in 2020 in Austin, Texas.

After an eight-day trial and two days of verdict deliberations, a jury in Travis county, Texas, found 33-year-old Daniel Perry guilty of murdering air force veteran Garrett Foster, 28. Perry is white, as was Foster.

While the jury also found Perry not guilty of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, the murder conviction left him facing a maximum of life imprisonment. He could be sentenced as soon as next week, according to the local television news outlet KXAN.

However, Texas’s Republican extremist governor Greg Abbott said on Saturday on Twitter that he was already working on pardoning Perry from his conviction, which he called an attempted jury nullification of Texas’s self-defense law.

Decide for yourself if it was self-defense after you read this:

In court, prosecutors brought up Facebook messages that Perry sent prior to Foster’s killing.

In one message, Perry wrote: “No protesters go near me or my car” and “I might go to Dallas to shoot looters,” the Austin television news outlet KTBC reported.

Another message that Perry sent on 31 May 2020 said: “I might have to kill a few people on my way to work they are rioting outside my apartment complex.” A few days later, Perry commented on a Facebook post of a video titled “Protesters Looters Get Shot San Antonio Texas”, writing, “glad someone finally did something”.

During the trial, Austin police detective William Bursley testified about evidence found on Perry’s cell phone. Part of the evidence included online searches for “protest tonight”, “protesters in Seattle gets shot”, “riot shootouts” and “protests in Dallas live”.

“This is an age-old story about a man who couldn’t keep his anger under control,” said prosecutor Guillermo Gonzalez, according to the Austin American-Statesman. “It’s not about police, and it’s not about protest marchers.

This ******* was armed and looking for trouble. He hasn't even been sentenced yet, but Gov. Abattoir is ready to pardon him.
 
Last edited:
Looks to me like the guy was looking to shoot someone. Pardoning him would be travesty of justice. But this is Texas.
 
To be fair, I read that more like a bit of pandering to the base by Abbott: "I'll do what I can etc etc.." especially since the pardon is based on recommendation by Board of pardons and paroles that the guy most likely is not eligible for a loooong time.

Wouldn't be surprised if he actually did something, but overturning a murder sentence by jury? That sounds a bit too far even for Texas Republicans.

Afaik in the case there were multiple witnesses saying that Foster never aimed a gun at Perry and there was nothing chambered in his AK, so it reads like a clear cut murder to me. The "coming right for us"-defense is a joke. But I guess shooting open carriers is fine for Repubs. as long as they disagree politically (or happen to be black, then the carry is not even needed)
 
Texas Governor Abbott plans to pardon man convicted of murdering BLM protestor

Decide for yourself if it was self-defense after you read this:

This ******* was armed and looking for trouble. He hasn't even been sentenced yet, but Gov. Abattoir is ready to pardon him.

The Guardian, a far-left organ, is not a very credible news source. The article describes Abbott as an "extremist governor" and says George Floyd was murdered by a police officer. (Floyd, a convicted violent felon and porn actor, was high on a massive dosage of fentanyl--nearly four times the fatal dosage--and violently resisted arrest, including kicking two of the police officers, before finally being pinned on the ground. He had multiple chances to avoid a confrontation and to avoid being pinned, but every single time he chose not to cooperate and then began violently resisting arrest. His death was a tragic accident caused by his own actions.)

So never mind that the BLM "protestors"--in truth, they were rioters-- surrounded Perry's car? How exactly was Perry supposed to "just drive away" with his car surrounded by screaming "protestors," some of whom were armed? Never mind that one of the BLM "protestors" fired three shots at Perry's car? Never mind that the defense proved with movement-tracking data that Perry's car was slowing down as it approached the crowd, not speeding up as the "protestors" falsely claimed? Never mind that Foster was carrying an AK-47 and pointed it at Perry as he approached Perry's window? Never mind that Foster was also armed with a club and a knife? Never mind that the BLM rioter who fired three shots at Perry's car was not prosecuted by the leftist DA? Just never mind all that?

Yes, the "protestors" who testified at the trial denied that Foster pointed his rifle at Perry, but those same witnesses also falsely claimed that Perry sped into the crowd, whereas tracking data proved this was a lie. In Perry's panicked 911 call, he frantically mentioned that a man had pointed a rifle at him. I find his spontaneous and frantic 911 call credible and believable, but the jury chose to believe the lying "protestors" and chose to ignore the fact that Perry's car was surrounded by an angry and armed mob.

I don't blame Abbott one bit for wanting to pardon Perry, given the facts of the case, given the absence of any video evidence, and given that the case was grossly over-charged.

https://www.lawofficer.com/gov-greg...r-conviction-death-blm-rioter-garrett-foster/
 
Last edited:
The Guardian, a far-left organ, is not a very credible news source. ]
And you're out of touch with reality. As usual...... :rolleyes:

So, when will you be returning to the "More Attempts by Conservatives to Control a Woman's Body" thread which you so ignominiously fled?
 
The Guardian, a far-left organ, is not a very credible news source. The article describes Abbott as an "extremist governor" and says George Floyd was murdered by a police officer. (Floyd, a convicted violent felon and porn actor, was high on a massive dosage of fentanyl--nearly four times the fatal dosage--and violently resisted arrest, including kicking two of the police officers, before finally being pinned on the ground. He had multiple chances to avoid a confrontation and to avoid being pinned, but every single time he chose not to cooperate and then began violently resisting arrest. His death was a tragic accident caused by his own actions.)

So never mind that the BLM "protestors"--in truth, they were rioters-- surrounded Perry's car? How exactly was Perry supposed to "just drive away" with his car surrounded by screaming "protestors," some of whom were armed? Never mind that one of the BLM "protestors" fired three shots at Perry's car? Never mind that the defense proved with movement-tracking data that Perry's car was slowing down as it approached the crowd, not speeding up as the "protestors" falsely claimed? Never mind that Foster was carrying an AK-47 and pointed it at Perry as he approached Perry's window? Never mind that Foster was also armed with a club and a knife? Never mind that the BLM rioter who fired three shots at Perry's car was not prosecuted by the leftist DA? Just never mind all that?

Yes, the "protestors" who testified at the trial denied that Foster pointed his rifle at Perry, but those same witnesses also falsely claimed that Perry sped into the crowd, whereas tracking data proved this was a lie. In Perry's panicked 911 call, he frantically mentioned that a man had pointed a rifle at him. I find his spontaneous and frantic 911 call credible and believable, but the jury chose to believe the lying "protestors" and chose to ignore the fact that Perry's car was surrounded by an angry and armed mob.

I don't blame Abbott one bit for wanting to pardon Perry, given the facts of the case, given the absence of any video evidence, and given that the case was grossly over-charged.

https://www.lawofficer.com/gov-greg...r-conviction-death-blm-rioter-garrett-foster/

You left out all the bits that said "Soros-inspired BLM shooter" and "Soros-supported DA" and such-like. You know...all the bits that show this is a right-wing nut-case-cops website. Also, my antivirus alarm went off when I browsed there. So it's a ****-show on the outside and on the inside.
 
The Graun " far left"?

Have you actually read it?

Do you know what left wing is?

Hint: it certainly isn't the Graun. Centerist at best. Which makes it to the left of most of our media, but not actually much left.
 
The Guardian, a far-left organ, is not a very credible news source. The article describes Abbott as an "extremist governor" and says George Floyd was murdered by a police officer. (Floyd, a convicted violent felon and porn actor, was high (right-wing propaganda snipped)

1) The Guardian is decidedly not "left wing". It might seem like it when all you consume is psychotic right wing sources but it isn't.

2) As for Floyd, you are once again wrong. You tried to pull these claims on the relevant Trials and Errors thread and got b-slapped so hard your multiple fringe-resets couldn't save you and you had to flee the thread with your tail between your legs. It was painfully obvious you hadn't even watched the trial despite claiming that you did.
 
The Guardian, a far-left organ, is not a very credible news source. T...snip...]

1) Is the story untrue?
2) Which facts are untrue?
3) What would you change with the jury system since you believe it was incapable of coming to the correct judgement in this case?
3) Should juries be abolished and have elected governors decide if someone is guilty or not?
 
The Guardian, a far-left organ, is not a very credible news source.

I stopped reading there. All Sides media bias says it 'leans left": "A Lean Left bias is a moderately liberal rating on the political spectrum.

But, I suppose it's 'far-left' coming from someone who gets his information from and often quotes The Gateway Pundit, Newsmax, Breitbart, etc. as his 'credible sources'.
 
That is what cracks me up. Mikey condemns the Guardian as being a left wing source, but he devoutly beleivews any Crap he hears on Fox News, Breibart, etc.
ANyway, now the major news services have picked up the story.
What concerns me is how blaent this is getting.The far right ig gearing up for a reign of terror.
 
The Graun " far left"?

Have you actually read it?

Do you know what left wing is?

Hint: it certainly isn't the Graun. Centerist at best. Which makes it to the left of most of our media, but not actually much left.

Do they blame the jews for his conviction? If not then they are clearly left wing to many people.
 
the beauty of declaring the concept of a fact as leftist ideology is that anyone interested in those is just a leftist and can be ignored
 
mikegriffith1 said:
(Floyd, a convicted violent felon and porn actor, was high on a massive dosage of fentanyl--nearly four times the fatal dosage--and violently resisted arrest, including kicking two of the police officers, before finally being pinned on the ground. He had multiple chances to avoid a confrontation and to avoid being pinned, but every single time he chose not to cooperate and then began violently resisting arrest. His death was a tragic accident caused by his own actions.)

2) As for Floyd, you are once again wrong. You tried to pull these claims on the relevant Trials and Errors thread and got b-slapped so hard your multiple fringe-resets couldn't save you and you had to flee the thread with your tail between your legs. It was painfully obvious you hadn't even watched the trial despite claiming that you did.
Or...so much as glanced at the autopsy...
 
This is purely politically motivated theater for Abbott. It's no coincidence that lying sleazeball Tucker C is involved defending Perry by claiming he shot in self-defense which a jury unanimously found to be false. Perry's own social media posts and private messages reveal a confrontational state of mind:
“I might have to kill a few people on my way to work they are rioting outside my apartment complex,” prosecutors read out during closing arguments."
and
“Make sure you only use one shot on the protestors so if they try you have enough. I’ll only shoot the ones in the front and push the pedal to the metal.”

From Texas Monthy (rated "Center" by [URL="https://www.allsides.com/news-source/texas-monthly-media-bias"]Allsides):[/URL]

The details of the crime are almost immaterial to Abbott, who’s motivated purely by political considerations. The Texas governor has been rooting around for issues to make his congenitally dull brand more appealing to national conservatives, and this is a good one. Foster was attending a protest against police violence in Austin when he was shot, the sort of protest right-wingers in Texas have long opposed. Perry, an Army sergeant who was working as a rideshare driver that night, was the right kind of person for Abbott to back.

“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition,” according to a modern aphorism. “To wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” Foster, an Air Force veteran, was legally carrying a rifle in accordance with state law as he protested police violence. He is the man whom the law binds but does not protect. Perry was an Uber driver who drove into the protest, saw Foster approach with his rifle, and shot him five times with a gun he was also legally allowed to carry, claiming the right to self-defense. Perry is the man who the law protects but does not bind.

The case concerning the shooting of Foster was not a he said, he said. In his statement to police following the shooting, which was videotaped and shown to the jury in full, Perry didn’t claim that Foster pointed his gun at him—which itself would not be sufficient cause to claim self-defense, under the instructions provided to the jury, but would have helped his case. No witnesses claimed Foster had been aiming at Perry, either. (Perry later claimed Foster had raised the barrel of his gun, though that too is disputed by witnesses.) Instead Perry, who says he’d been distracted before he turned into the path of the protest, said that he “didn’t want to give [Foster] a chance to aim at me.” So Perry shot him five times with a .357 revolver through the window of his car.

Immediately, Perry became a cause célèbre to conservatives who argued he had put down a dangerous element destroying the city. In their telling, Foster had been aiming his gun at Perry, who had narrowly escaped with his life. José Garza, the Travis County district attorney who brought the case, became a “[George] Soros prosecutor” who was a “cancerous tumor” and an “evil, subversive, dangerous Marxist,” according to one very dyspeptic commentator who was retweeted by Texas GOP chair Matt Rinaldi. Abbott called Garza a “rogue” prosecutor, without clarifying what he had gone rogue from. Republican congressman Chip Roy, who represents a district that includes a slice of Austin, argued that the verdict was a decision “in favor of the lawless over those defending against the lawless.”

The night of the conviction, Tucker Carlson urged Abbott to issue a pardon. He told his audience he had asked Abbott on the show and that Abbott had declined. He scorched the governor for that: “So that is Greg Abbott’s position—there is no right of self-defense in Texas.” Carlson’s segments go for marching orders in today’s GOP, and nobody can afford to get on his bad side.

There is no grand principle of justice that the governor is expressing. There is only this: the law must bind my enemies and not my friends, and it must protect my friends but not my enemies. That approach may be an inevitable result of one-party rule, but it also, historically, ends pretty badly for everyone. It is hard not to feel foreboding about what Tucker Carlson might tell the governor to do next.
 
The Guardian, a far-left organ, is not a very credible news source. The article describes Abbott as an "extremist governor" and says George Floyd was murdered by a police officer. (Floyd, a convicted violent felon and porn actor, was high on a massive dosage of fentanyl--nearly four times the fatal dosage--and violently resisted arrest, including kicking two of the police officers, before finally being pinned on the ground. He had multiple chances to avoid a confrontation and to avoid being pinned, but every single time he chose not to cooperate and then began violently resisting arrest. His death was a tragic accident caused by his own actions.)

So never mind that the BLM "protestors"--in truth, they were rioters-- surrounded Perry's car? How exactly was Perry supposed to "just drive away" with his car surrounded by screaming "protestors," some of whom were armed? Never mind that one of the BLM "protestors" fired three shots at Perry's car? Never mind that the defense proved with movement-tracking data that Perry's car was slowing down as it approached the crowd, not speeding up as the "protestors" falsely claimed? Never mind that Foster was carrying an AK-47 and pointed it at Perry as he approached Perry's window? Never mind that Foster was also armed with a club and a knife? Never mind that the BLM rioter who fired three shots at Perry's car was not prosecuted by the leftist DA? Just never mind all that?

Yes, the "protestors" who testified at the trial denied that Foster pointed his rifle at Perry, but those same witnesses also falsely claimed that Perry sped into the crowd, whereas tracking data proved this was a lie. In Perry's panicked 911 call, he frantically mentioned that a man had pointed a rifle at him. I find his spontaneous and frantic 911 call credible and believable, but the jury chose to believe the lying "protestors" and chose to ignore the fact that Perry's car was surrounded by an angry and armed mob.

I don't blame Abbott one bit for wanting to pardon Perry, given the facts of the case, given the absence of any video evidence, and given that the case was grossly over-charged.

https://www.lawofficer.com/gov-greg...r-conviction-death-blm-rioter-garrett-foster/

So you are OK with police being allowed to be judge,jury, and executioner?
 

Back
Top Bottom