• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Bitcoin - Part 3

Pixel42 said:
Before I do that, can you please explain to me where those "few million" would have come from? Did they just materialise out of thin air, did they use to belong to other people who are now a little (or a lot) poorer, did making them have an environmental impact?

I'd need to know what the cost of them was so I can choose the most appropriate charity to pay it back, and then calculate whether I'd done more harm than good.
Click to expand...
How are you going to measure that? It seems to me that the only losers are the ones who bought high and sold low (or left them in a shonky exchange too long). The hodlers are doing fine thank you very much.
 
jeremyp said:
No. The table is right. The text is wrong. The energy consumed by the top 20 gold producers is given as 306,646 TJ. The gold produced by the top 20 gold producers is given as 30,857 koz. Divide the one figure by the other and you get approximately 8 GJ/oz. The figures only make sense if the column labels are correct.

And think about it: if the energy requirement was as high as you say it is, nobody would be able to afford to mine gold.


You do realise that trading in gold doesn't require it to be moved anywhere, don't you? It only needs to be moved when somebody wants to use it for something.


No, I would rather have stocks and shares.

And I'd rather just take a credit card with me. Credit cards just work. The conversion into local currency happens automatically and I am protected if I do get scammed.
Click to expand...

At least you admit the page you linked to has something wrong with the data.
 
Pixel42 said:
Before I do that, can you please explain to me where those "few million" would have come from? Did they just materialise out of thin air, did they use to belong to other people who are now a little (or a lot) poorer, did making them have an environmental impact?

I'd need to know what the cost of them was so I can choose the most appropriate charity to pay it back, and then calculate whether I'd done more harm than good.
Click to expand...

Ah, I see. The morality factor. Yet with that high of a moral standard that would also mean you can't invest in anything or start a business. Think about it, when you profit from stock where did the profit come from? If you own stock in the major oil companies then you profit from hard working people who give up a good portion of their paycheck just to get back and forth from work.
If you purchase real estate and sell for a profit, you've taken money from people who are now a little poorer. You certainly can't open a market or any type of business because you may profit from those customers who shop there.

If you use that moral standard on Bitcoin, to be fair you must also apply it to everything else. Buying something for $.05 and offering it for sale at $.06 is not anything to be ashamed of. You're offering a product and if someone wishes to buy it they will, if not then you won't sell that product. That's how business and Bitcoin works.
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
Egypt, Iraq, Qatar, Oman, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Bangladesh, and China have all banned cryptocurrency. Must be working! Oh wait.
Click to expand...

Well .. countries like that can hardly ban anything. It would work quite well in civilized countries. It would stop investors big and small. Even today you basically can't convert crypto to fiat in secret or anonymously. All exchanges are regulated and have to disclosure details in tax investigation.
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
Waste not want not. 1 ounce of Gold reportedly requires 8.3 Terajoules of energy to mine. As of now that's $1,841 USD worth of Gold.
.
Click to expand...

This seems unlikely.

1 gallon of diesel cost ~5.7USD and contains ~140MJ. 8.3TJ would translate to ~60 000 gallons of diesel costing ~360 000USD to mine 1 oz of gold so your number must be ~3 orders of magnitude too high. Higher than that if you consider that internal combustion engines only convert ~30% of their heat into usable energy.

ChrisBFRPKY said:
10 ounces of Gold at 2,305,557 KWH 2300KWh per ounce to mine = 23,055,570 KWH (Twenty-three million, fifty-five thousand, five hundred seventy KWH.) 23 000KWh

Gold requires 23,055,570 KWH 23 000KWh and approximately the same value amount in Bitcoin requires 143,000 KWH.
Click to expand...


Of course this exudes the fact that gold has utility (industrial uses plus making pretty things) whereas bitcoin has almost none. (Keep in mind this is coming from someone who doesn't think much of gold as an investment. At best it's a proxy for the economy of India)
 
Last edited:
ChrisBFRPKY said:
Ah, I see. The morality factor. Yet with that high of a moral standard that would also mean you can't invest in anything or start a business. Think about it, when you profit from stock where did the profit come from? If you own stock in the major oil companies then you profit from hard working people who give up a good portion of their paycheck just to get back and forth from work.
If you purchase real estate and sell for a profit, you've taken money from people who are now a little poorer. You certainly can't open a market or any type of business because you may profit from those customers who shop there.

If you use that moral standard on Bitcoin, to be fair you must also apply it to everything else. Buying something for $.05 and offering it for sale at $.06 is not anything to be ashamed of. You're offering a product and if someone wishes to buy it they will, if not then you won't sell that product. That's how business and Bitcoin works.
Click to expand...

Indeed, which is why many people (including me) look for the most ethical investments, avoid buying products from companies known to exploit their workers or pollute the environment etc. My very presence on this planet will inevitably impact it and my fellow citizens but there are still choices I can make which affect whether that impact is for good or ill, or at least minimise the ill.

I asked where the money I might make from buying and selling Bitcoin would come from because I genuinely don't know, the whole cryptocurrency thing is a complete mystery to me. I recently chose to invest £5000 in a community solar farm project, maybe I should indeed have used it to make millions out of Bitcoin and donated them to charity instead. So I would appreciate an answer, if you have one.
 
Pixel42 said:
I asked where the money I might make from buying and selling Bitcoin would come from because I genuinely don't know, the whole cryptocurrency thing is a complete mystery to me.
Click to expand...
I could understand it if you refused to get involved in bitcoin due to the excessive energy consumption devoted to mining.

However, I don't understand your interest in whether a speculator gained or lost money in bitcoin. Gamblers wanna gamble. Most of the gains or losses in bitcoin speculation are unrealized anyway.
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
Yet with that high of a moral standard that would also mean you can't invest in anything or start a business. Think about it, when you profit from stock where did the profit come from?
Click to expand...
Net present value of future earnings.

When you own shares you own a fraction of that companies future profits no matter whether they return that to you in the form of dividends or re-invest it for you in the form of retained earnings. These future earnings have an equivalent value in present day money (called net present value)which gives a company it's value. If future earnings increase so does the value of the company.

This won't translate to bitcoin, since it has no future earnings.

ChrisBFRPKY said:
If you own stock in the major oil companies then you profit from hard working people who give up a good portion of their paycheck just to get back and forth from work.
Click to expand...

There is utility in getting back and forth to work, and from the customer perspective there is an overall increase in utility. The problem with oil companies is that a large part of the cost of oil is socialized instead of being paid for by the company or it's customers. These socialized costs reduce economic efficiency and overall economic productivity in the long run and therefor hurt consumers, even those benefiting from artificially cheep gasoline.

ChrisBFRPKY said:
If you purchase real estate and sell for a profit, you've taken money from people who are now a little poorer.
Click to expand...

On the contrary there is value in meshing the needs of buyers with those of sellers so long as there is no monopoly or market manipulation involved. This added value increases the overall goods\services produced by the economy and makes everyone a little richer.

ChrisBFRPKY said:
If you use that moral standard on Bitcoin, to be fair you must also apply it to everything else.
Click to expand...

Bitcoin doesn't have the positive economic benefits of the other things you mention.

The lack of economic benefits to offset the high infrastructure and energy costs means the mere existence of bitcoin makes everyone a little poorer. Since those costs are socialized, the people causing the problem get to benefit financially from doing so. Regulation (AKA laws against socializing the costs of your economic activity) is a key part of limiting the damage these types of schemes do the the economy and are probably entirely appropriate with bitcoin.
 
lomiller said:
This seems unlikely.

1 gallon of diesel cost ~5.7USD and contains ~140MJ. 8.3TJ would translate to ~60 000 gallons of diesel costing ~360 000USD to mine 1 oz of gold so your number must be ~3 orders of magnitude too high. Higher than that if you consider that internal combustion engines only convert ~30% of their heat into usable energy.




Of course this exudes the fact that gold has utility (industrial uses plus making pretty things) whereas bitcoin has almost none. (Keep in mind this is coming from someone who doesn't think much of gold as an investment. At best it's a proxy for the economy of India)
Click to expand...

He's wrong by exactly three orders of magnitude. Somebody misread the units on the table in the article I linked earlier.

It should be pretty obvious really: if the energy cost of mining an ounce of gold was more than its price on the market, the miners would be making a loss on every ounce. Nobody would be mining gold.

There's anther point which is that, if nobody was mining gold, it would still be possible to speculate on its value as a commodity. The energy costs will be practically zero because when you buy gold, it isn't delivered to you (unless you are buying it to make it into something), it just sits in a bank vault and somebody in the bank just makes a note that you now own the gold, not the seller.

With Bitcoin, the energy costs are associated with each and every blockchain transaction. When they stop mining (i.e. creating new coins), the energy costs will still be there.
 
Pixel42 said:
Indeed, which is why many people (including me) look for the most ethical investments, avoid buying products from companies known to exploit their workers or pollute the environment etc. My very presence on this planet will inevitably impact it and my fellow citizens but there are still choices I can make which affect whether that impact is for good or ill, or at least minimise the ill.

I asked where the money I might make from buying and selling Bitcoin would come from because I genuinely don't know, the whole cryptocurrency thing is a complete mystery to me. I recently chose to invest £5000 in a community solar farm project, maybe I should indeed have used it to make millions out of Bitcoin and donated them to charity instead. So I would appreciate an answer, if you have one.
Click to expand...

There are several strategies one can use. All it takes to get started is to open an account at a reputable cryptocurrency company. You can quite literally control your investment vehicle from the comfort of your home. Buy in, sell, get out or repeat. If you buy and sell from your account you can deposit or withdraw directly to your bank.

Some buy in, hold their crypto and simply wait for an increase in price. Others buy in and day trade when the market has some decent volatility. (So far in the past 48 hours BTC has had a $1600/coin price difference between the daily high and low. A decent trader would have likely realized $1000 per Bitcoin average profit over this past 2 day period) I've said it before and I'll say it again, it's relatively easy to make $1000 a day trading cryptocurrency. Do that 1000 times and you've made your first crypto million. Or make $2000, 500 times or $10,000 , 100 times.

Bitcoin should be considered as a commodity for trade IMO. Speculation is where the money is, again IMO.

Anyone can become a trader. Simply start small to practice buying and selling, learn how the fees work and at what price point you can sell to be in profit. Your calculator becomes your best friend. Or some choose to buy and hold. Holding is a sound strategy but may take longer to realize profits. Set yourself a magic number and if or when it arrives sell half or all of your bag. (half means you still have coin in case you missed the top)

If it sounds interesting go for it. If it's not for you at least now you know. :thumbsup:

BTW, the community solar is usually a scam. If it's sponsored by your power company you end up paying about 3 to 4 times what the solar panels actually cost and they usually cut you off the program after 20 years, even though most panels still produce 80% of wattage as they did when new. At least that's the scam they run here in the States.
 
lomiller said:
Net present value of future earnings.

When you own shares you own a fraction of that companies future profits no matter whether they return that to you in the form of dividends or re-invest it for you in the form of retained earnings. These future earnings have an equivalent value in present day money (called net present value)which gives a company it's value. If future earnings increase so does the value of the company.

This won't translate to bitcoin, since it has no future earnings.



There is utility in getting back and forth to work, and from the customer perspective there is an overall increase in utility. The problem with oil companies is that a large part of the cost of oil is socialized instead of being paid for by the company or it's customers. These socialized costs reduce economic efficiency and overall economic productivity in the long run and therefor hurt consumers, even those benefiting from artificially cheep gasoline.



On the contrary there is value in meshing the needs of buyers with those of sellers so long as there is no monopoly or market manipulation involved. This added value increases the overall goods\services produced by the economy and makes everyone a little richer.



Bitcoin doesn't have the positive economic benefits of the other things you mention.

The lack of economic benefits to offset the high infrastructure and energy costs means the mere existence of bitcoin makes everyone a little poorer. Since those costs are socialized, the people causing the problem get to benefit financially from doing so. Regulation (AKA laws against socializing the costs of your economic activity) is a key part of limiting the damage these types of schemes do the the economy and are probably entirely appropriate with bitcoin.
Click to expand...

All I know is I've been retired since turning 49 a few years back, almost four years to the day after I began day trading crypto. Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies were the vehicle that made it possible. My investments went from $300 each to over $60K each at one point. Stock doesn't do that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom