9 plus 23 equals? Is even math fake news now?
It is fake news when you combine "absolutely" and "probably" to arrive at a percentage for what we imply is definitely "true".
9 plus 23 equals? Is even math fake news now?
It's not a guarantee, of course. But, this single online poll somehow is.![]()
It is fake news when you combine "absolutely" and "probably" to arrive at a percentage for what we imply is definitely "true".
Sadly many people, like you, thought a 71-95% chance of something happening was a guarantee it would happen
I want to make sure I remember this as a supporting argument for accuracy in polling. Very convincing.![]()
It's not a guarantee, of course. But, this single online poll somehow is.![]()
Do you know how statistics work at all?
Let's roll it back a little:
Now we are at:
And, of course we must always trust internet-based polling, right?
I remember one time that polling was way off, but I'd have to go back to 2016, for that.
https://www.thewrap.com/every-poll-that-got-election-wrong-donald-trump/
But, hey, "belief" is where is anything can be true! Follow your heart!
I've heard that they are just as accurate as the source and methods from which they are derived. Forgetting about any "loose" interpretations, of course.
Remember, "Absolutely" + "Probably" implies "Definitely".![]()
People who think something is definitely true and people who think something is probabaly true both think it's true. This is how words work.
Maybe at your house, not mine.
Probably true > 50% likelihoodMaybe at your house, not mine.
Just so long as absolutely, definitely, and probably are all equally true...hell, lets throw in "maybe" while we're at it. Good argument.![]()
Probably true > 50% likelihood
Probably false < 50% likelihood
Absolutely true = 100% likelihood
Absolutely false = 0% likelihood
General Republicans are contrarian trolls with no philosophy beyond an obstructionist "The liberals/left/democrats/etc" cannot under any circumstances be allowed to get what they want."
The problem is when you have that mentality against a group that is, as wrong and stupid as they can still sometimes be, at least as functionally still on the same plane of reality as... well reality as the Left is, you're functionally turning yourself into insane.
Even if every thing the Republicans did was wrong, evil, stupid, counter-productive, etc I wouldn't necessarily think they were crazy if they had any actual goals that were independent of "Those dirty lubruls say 2+2=4 and poking yourself in the eye with a stick hurts, just who are they to tell me what to think watch me poke myself in the eye with a stick and say 2+2=5...."
But now, no they've have simply declared themselves to be anti-reality. And there's no hair to split between that and "crazy."
Yes, that gets into a finer level of detail, same approach.Keep in mind we also have a "not sure" option that would include values near 50% likelihood and that 100% likelihood isn't achievable in real world problems so the people answering absolutely true really mean "some arbitrarily high likelihood". The scale probabaly looks more like this for most people:
Absolutely true > 80% likely but < 100% likely
Probabaly true 60% likely - 80% likely
Not sure 40% likely - 60% likely
Probabaly false 20% likely to 40% likely
Absolutely false > 0% likely but < 20% likely
General Republicans are contrarian trolls with no philosophy beyond an obstructionist "The liberals/left/democrats/etc" cannot under any circumstances be allowed to get what they want."
The problem is when you have that mentality against a group that is, as wrong and stupid as they can still sometimes be, at least as functionally still on the same plane of reality as... well reality as the Left is, you're functionally turning yourself into insane.
Even if every thing the Republicans did was wrong, evil, stupid, counter-productive, etc I wouldn't necessarily think they were crazy if they had any actual goals that were independent of "Those dirty lubruls say 2+2=4 and poking yourself in the eye with a stick hurts, just who are they to tell me what to think watch me poke myself in the eye with a stick and say 2+2=5...."
But now, no they've have simply declared themselves to be anti-reality. And there's no hair to split between that and "crazy."
"Let's talk about exactly what percentage may or may not be correct instead of the fact that most people who have embraced the 'microchip in the vaccine' stupidity are Republicans" distraction tactic in all its glory.
I've heard that they are just as accurate as the source and methods from which they are derived. Forgetting about any "loose" interpretations, of course.
Remember, "Absolutely" + "Probably" implies "Definitely".![]()