I finally put my life saving into Bitcoin last Tuesday. I haven't checked lately, but I bet I've made some real dough since then. I may retire soon.
I finally put my life saving into Bitcoin last Tuesday. I haven't checked lately, but I bet I've made some real dough since then. I may retire soon.
Buy on the back foot!
With what? I'm all-in already . . . .
Well, about that second mortgage...
I finally put my life saving into Bitcoin last Tuesday. I haven't checked lately, but I bet I've made some real dough since then. I may retire soon.
What about "all-in" did you not understand?
What about "all-in" did you not understand?
Oh you already sold it, then?
Time to "mortgage" your remaining "assets", then.
US Treasury May Require Reporting Of Crypto Transfers Over $10K To The IRS
As central banks explore digital currencies, governments are rallying
for increased oversight of mercurial crypto assets. A major part of the
regulatory quagmire over digital money concerns taxes. This year, the
IRS has been strengthening its ability to track tax payers who own
cryptocurrencies by probing digital currency exchanges and threatening
to seize the assets of tax evaders. In the latest sign of a looming regulatory
crack down on crypto, the Treasury Department has said it will require any
transfer worth $10,000 or more to be reported to the IRS.
A little misleading.US Treasury May Require Reporting Of Crypto Transfers Over $10K To The IRS
A little misleading.
Crypto exchanges can certainly be forced to report crypto purchases of over $10K but wallet to wallet transfers are by definition unreportable (unless the authorities know who owns a wallet).
Speculating with cryptos via exchanges leaves a trail that the tax man can follow if you are being audited. However, it is the USD and not the crypto that is leaving the trail. That is why the headline is misleading.Sure, but speculative transactions are a big part of Bitcoin. That means people want the ability to cash out, and putting in reporting requirements helps ensure people gambling on bitcoin get taxed on significant winnings.
Speculating with cryptos via exchanges leaves a trail that the tax man can follow if you are being audited. However, it is the USD and not the crypto that is leaving the trail. That is why the headline is misleading.
You can't see that these two statements are contradictory? Who is required to report wallet to wallet transactions?It may be difficult for wallet to wallet transactions to be traced, but that doesn't mean the IRS can't require that these transactions be reported.
You can't see that these two statements are contradictory? Who is required to report wallet to wallet transactions?
It reminds me of the 1979 story of a council in WA that passed a law prohibiting Skylab from crashing in their district. (Skylab complied).
The article didn't say that. It said that the IRS is "probing digital currency exchanges" which means that it is tracking the USD.I suppose the people that own the wallets, assuming they are US citizens, would be obligated to report.
The article didn't say that. It said that the IRS is "probing digital currency exchanges" which means that it is tracking the USD.