Squeegee Beckenheim
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2010
- Messages
- 32,124
LNER has been owned by the Department for Transport for three years [...]
Now it makes even more sense that they'd have a policy like this.
LNER has been owned by the Department for Transport for three years [...]
Does this apply to 1) complaining about the announcement on the train or 2) complaining about the complaint about the announcement on the train or 3) complaining about the train operator's response to the complaint?I can't imagine how fragile you have to be in order to be offended by this turn of events, but I am reasonably certain that you have to actively be looking to be offended.
Seems like the real story here is that the company already had in place rules which stated that inclusive language should be used when making announcements. Company policy wasn't followed, a customer complained, the company apologised and asked for more information so they could ensure that company policy would be followed in the future.
I can't imagine how fragile you have to be in order to be offended by this turn of events, but I am reasonably certain that you have to actively be looking to be offended.
If you're stepping on a Japan Airlines (JAL) plane anytime next month, chances are you won't hear the term "ladies and gentlemen" anymore.
Instead, from 1 October, gender-neutral phrases like "attention all passengers", or references to passengers as "everyone" will be used, reported local site the Mainichi.
JAL is one of a few global airlines to embrace gender-neutral greetings.
However, it will only apply to JAL's English announcements, AFP said.
That is because in Japanese, the expression generally used for such announcements is already gender-neutral, the agency added.
LNER has been owned by the Department for Transport for three years, so this is essentially Boris Johnson making the apology.
However, it still has a train on the Edinburgh-London route named "The Flying Scotsman", how non-inclusive is that FFS?
LNER has been owned by the Department for Transport for three years, so this is essentially Boris Johnson making the apology.
However, it still has a train on the Edinburgh-London route named "The Flying Scotsman", how non-inclusive is that FFS?
I think Squeege here is referring to cullennz's complaint, to take the immediate example.Does this apply to 1) complaining about the announcement on the train or 2) complaining about the complaint about the announcement on the train or 3) complaining about the train operator's response to the complaint?
OK. Let's hope Squeegee Beckenheim wasn't offended by this.I think Squeege here is referring to cullennz's complaint, to take the immediate example.
I'm pretty sure I've abbreviated Squeegee's name before without it being reported. I get called "arth" all the time and I don't mind. If Squeegee Beckenheim prefers me to use their full name of course I will apologise and do so.OK. Let's hope Squeegee Beckenheim wasn't offended by this.
I was thinking about airplanes, and although I haven't been on one lately, due to the pandemic, I believe that when either the pilot or the head flight attendant comes on the PA to make an announcement or welcome passengers aboard, they typically start by addressing the passengers as "ladies and gentlemen". For example, "Ladies and gentlemen, this is your pilot (or the captain) speaking. Welcome aboard flight such-and-such ..."
At least that's how I seem to remember it.
E.g., this video from 2019 seems to confirm it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDheaoF3Hto
Is it a problem? Personally I was just fine with the way things were, but I'm also not going to get terribly upset if they decide to make a change.
Gotcha. Well, I guess it was an appropriate if unintended reminder about changing peoples' names when referring to them.I mean offended by cullennz complaining about the kerfuffle
I think Squeege here is referring to cullennz's complaint, to take the immediate example.
Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger was at least on point with "This is the Captain. Brace for impact" just before ditching in the Hudson river
"Not offending the non-binaries" is not the point. The point is not excluding them.To be fair "not offending the non-binaries" might not have been uppermost in his thinking at that moment!
Pretty sure he was referring to the fragile passenger to be fair.
The trains have been pretty punctual since hardly anyone has been travelling on them.
False. Poster expressed annoyance with the bsery of such announcements.In this post you:
Express lamemt over a perceived loss of status.
BS. Everyone on the train has the same "experience". I matters not a whit that gosh there are a random selection of people on the train. Quelle surprise.Minimize the experiences others have that you do not.
Given that my eldest child (now an adult) has had my absolute support through his transition, and given that I volunteered on the support line and took the training and the post call support, I can state that you have nonsense opinions. What is most in mind for my trans son. His CV and job applications. Seems a normal interest to me.Complained about something that probably causes you not one iota of harm (so we know you have nothing important in your life to worry about).
Finally!
Confirmation that trans women are not women. Good work, LNER!