Babbylonian
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2007
- Messages
- 14,103
Deleted. I believe what I typed violates at least the spirit of the mod box posted while I was typing.
Last edited:
He was black.
He was a "bad" man.
He is prematurely dead.
You (amongst others) are celebrating that fact.
That is, and has been consistently enough evidence on this forum to insinuate (or claim outright) racism on your part,
The accusation of racism.Except that it isn't the same argument. As I stated, you are comparing apples to oranges. Pretty clearly.
Is what a knee jerk reaction? Pointing out your argument is so flawed as to be baseless?
The accusation of racism.
He was black.
He was a "bad" man.
He is prematurely dead.
You (amongst others) are celebrating that fact.
That is, and has been consistently enough evidence on this forum to insinuate (or claim outright) racism on your part,
I did not say that you had.
How would you characterize post 81?
Cain was stupid. Now he's ten toes up.
I'll say the same about anyone similarly stupid. White, brown, black, red, yellow, green or grey.
I'm an equal opportunity pisser on graves.
I'm not big on celebrating the misfortunes of others.
But that doesn't mean I can't notice that some people are actively competing for a Darwin Award.
Cain isn't just some random conservative schmuck that died from covid because they took advice from Fox News.
He's a (minor) leader in the movement. He played a role in advocating for this death cult of an ideology. His death by Covid may, in-fact, play a small role in waking up duped conservatives to the danger of the course of action conservative propaganda is advocating.
This isn't just misfortune, this is an arsonist getting consumed by the same fire he started. It's a good outcome.
I'm not big on celebrating the misfortunes of others.
But that doesn't mean I can't notice that some people are actively competing for a Darwin Award.
I'm not big on celebrating the misfortunes of others.
But that doesn't mean I can't notice that some people are actively competing for a Darwin Award.
But it is not wrong or an exaggeration to say that Cain may be alive today had he not followed Trump.
It most certainly is. Wearing a mask does not, in any way, protect you from contracting the virus. While I will accept that wearing a mask would have made it more socially acceptable for whoever spread it to wear his or her mask, he could have still caught it following all of the current guidance.
If he only had a meal with his beer, that might have made a difference (CA). Or not drinking after 11 PM, that might have helped (OH).
Given that the current guidance would have included social distancing, mask usage, and not attending political rallies (or any other large gathering, especially where people aren't observing other precautions), I think your speculation is unwarranted. It's clear that he followed none of the "current guidance." He certainly didn't follow the guidance of local Tulsa officials (the mayor) who indicated that the rally he attended should be cancelled.It most certainly is. Wearing a mask does not, in any way, protect you from contracting the virus. While I will accept that wearing a mask would have made it more socially acceptable for whoever spread it to wear his or her mask, he could have still caught it following all of the current guidance.
I’m not sure if failure to use a mask should qualify for a Darwin Award. The mask isn’t intended to protect the wearer, so someone refusing to wear on then dyeing from COVID-19 is more of a “got what they deserved” thing than a “done in by their own stupidity” thing.
Failure, maybe not. Deliberately not and flouting the known science on the other hand.
You are right. The mask does a better job at protecting others than the wearer. Still, Cain attended the Tulsa rally where he knew masks wouldn't be worn. So Cain being in a high risk group placed himself in an environment that was risky. Did he not?