No. Life on Earth is 3.8 billion years old. Humans are only 190,000 years old.
Who cares about this fictional "god" character invented by bronze age sheep herders, 3,000 years ago.
No species "needs to evolve". Mutations occur naturally and allow for evolution.
That's why you deny cancer (DNA mutation) exists, because you are a religious person from the Dark Ages.
So you now admit that DNA mutates and thus allows for evolution. You should write that down on your forehead with a black felt marker.
No. As I actually know biology I inform you that most mutations are destructive. That's why life on Earth has taken 3.8 billion years to evolve. It is only advantageous mutations that increase a species reproduction advantage. You didn't even know that?
The universe does not evolve and planets don't have babies. Are you really that insane that you think planets have offspring using DNA?
No. The evolved bacteria that are now resistant to antibiotics are resistant to antibiotics. Ask a four year old to explain this to you as you are really struggling with this basic fact.
Neither do you. Bacteria don't understand evolution. Neither do you.
Matthew Ellard said:
tazanastazio said:
Here is an "iota" of evidence over the existence of the "Alpha and the Omega" :
Which sex among the species evolved first? How did the species produce prior to evolving reproductive organs?
How did the species produced the organs of vision prior to knowing what was there to see?
Why did species evolve consciousness? What purpose would guilt serve them individually?
Perhaps the human need of consciousness, guilt and even the forming of religions did evolve - under the Infinite's involvement / ordained by God - as a first means of collective self administration; but species individually would have no purpose to evolve guilt. In the contrary!
Isn't it not that the need to prove that God does not exist, springs from our very quest to get rid of guilt?
How was the first chicken produced prior to the egg producing ability evolving?
Especially when the answers are in fact freely available to anyone who can be bothered to look them up.
Here is an "iota" of evidence over the existence of the "Alpha and the Omega" :
Which sex among the species evolved first? How did the species produce prior to evolving reproductive organs?
How did the species produced the organs of vision prior to knowing what was there to see?
Why did species evolve consciousness? What purpose would guilt serve them individually?
Perhaps the human need of consciousness, guilt and even the forming of religions did evolve - under the Infinite's involvement / ordained by God - as a first means of collective self administration; but species individually would have no purpose to evolve guilt. In the contrary!
Isn't it not that the need to prove that God does not exist, springs from our very quest to get rid of guilt?
How was the first chicken produced prior to the egg producing ability evolving?
Once the thin veneer of infinity mumbo-jumbo is scraped away, all that's left is just another willfully ignorant Christian fundy? How...disappointing
No clue. You'd probably get a good answer if you asked a biologist who specialized in the evolution of eggs and private parts, or read a book that explained this. Why haven't you?
Dawkins explained this wonderfully once, but I don't know if the video is on YouTube anymore. But again, if you really want to know and you aren't asking this as a rhetorical question, why don't you go find out?
Probably just a byproduct of our brains growing as advanced as they are.
With pack animals, the group that has members with emotions like guilt survive and thrive better than the ones where it's every man for himself, and thus their individuals have a higher chance of spreading their genes.
Oh, but doesn't that actually happen? I think the byproducts of a "special moment" between the Earth and other celestial object created our MoonSo you think a "mummy planet" and a "daddy planet" have a special moment and form baby planets.
.