Lol. How about both?
Kinda funny how people like you think that fascist should be allowed to spew their hate in public without anyone beating the everloving crap out of them. If you are an apologist for the fascists, you are no better than the fascists.
Grow a spine, and pick a side already.
The real problem, as we've seen over and over, is that they will *not* stop at just ranting on some street corner. They gather into groups, and then run around attacking random people because they're "antifa" or their not white, or white but a woman walking with a nonwhite guy, or whatever.
"Tolerating" Unite the Right is what led to Heather Heyer being murdered, DeAndre Harris being beaten by four armed Nazi wannabes, and a police copter crashing.
"Tolerating" Steve Crowder leads to multiple reporters being deluged with death threats against them and anyone related to them, doxxing, and the like.
"Tolerating" Andy Ngo led to a victim of an attack being doxxed and having Nazi wannabes planning to stand around screaming outside her house.
"Tolerating" Alex Jones led to multiple families having to hide the graves of their murdered children, having to move from house to house, and so on.
"Tolerating" the Ferguson PD led to a full-scale siege on an entire neighborhood for the offense of mourning a teen who was killed.
Are there people being radicalized - maladjusted teen white boys - who can be rescued? Sure, and people should work on doing this more effectively, even if the current leader of their country actively opposes such efforts (I'm thinking specifically of Dolt 45 here). But if someone hauls off and beats Richard Spencer, Andrew Anglin, Milo Yourmomsasnitch, etc. in the street with a chain - yes, it should remain illegal, yes it is vigilantism, but I'd chuckle. There are times when it's permissible to break the law, and in the case of people actively organizing groups of people to harass or murder people based on things that they cannot change, I'm fine with it.
