• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC CT claims drift

kevin

Graduate Poster
K
Joined
Aug 18, 2005
Messages
1,666
Is it just me or do the CT claims seem to be experiencing a type of thread drift?

  • christophera started a thread seeking explanation of the "free fall of the towers." But now we have truthseeker1234 stating as proven that the buildings fell FASTER than free fall.
  • pulverized concrete is getting smaller and smaller as time goes on. truthseeker now has it down to dust particles.

Anyone know of others? I think killtown had some in his little prove the photo fake thread.

and this all occurs even though they can't prove the first assertions, let alone the later ones.
 
The truth is a hard thing to deny. Especially whan all the facts keep getting in the way.
 
uruk said:
The truth is a hard thing to deny. Especially whan all the facts keep getting in the way.
Click to expand...
you dont base CTs on facts, you base in who had the most to gain and who had the means. If th facts contradict it...change the facts.
 
firecoins said:
you dont base CTs on facts, you base in who had the most to gain and who had the means. If th facts contradict it...change the facts.
Click to expand...

...And you compare pictures of billowing dust clouds to pictures of nuclear explosions and volcanic pyroclastic flows.
Hmmm... If the look the same, BY GOD AND HOLY MOTHER ALMIGHTY!, they must be the same.

...And you have to believe that everybody's watchs and clocks must be perfectly synchronized.

...And-----
 
A lot of CTs experience drift. As I understand it, in the original 1947 Roswell crash all that was recovered were bits of mylar/aluminum/whatever. The army guy told the newspapers it was a spaceship. Then, there was a report in the 50s about discovery of alien bodies which was never confirmed by any military source. Over time, the whole thing got conflated into one event where the spaceship and bodies were all admitted to (and then retracted) by the army.

Tme has a way of distorting things to suit our psychological needs.

If, however, you're just talking about thread drift, that's because the CTists are incapable of honestly evaluating their information.
 
And those who accept convention also honestly believe that Oswald acted alone, the magic bullet actually performed as the Warren commission said it did and the Navy's destroyer was actually in danger of being sunk by the unknown NVM patrol boat thereby giving us the truthful and accurate Gulf of Tonkin "incident".

And GW bush is actually the elected president of your nation.
 
Last edited:
joemailman said:
And those who accept convention also honestly believe that Oswald acted alone, the magic bullet actually performed as the Warren commission said it did and the Navy's destroyer was actually in danger of being sunk by the unknown NVM patrol boat thereby giving us the truthful and accurate Gulf of Tonkin "incident".
Click to expand...

Since we are talking about JFK...you never got back to us in this thread:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=61416&page=6

Is this the memo that implicates Bush in the assassination?

PresJfkBush.gif
 
joemailman said:
And those who accept convention also honestly believe that Oswald acted alone, the magic bullet actually performed as the Warren commission said it did and the Navy's destroyer was actually in danger of being sunk by the unknown NVM patrol boat thereby giving us the truthful and accurate Gulf of Tonkin "incident".

And GW bush is actually the elected president of your nation.
Click to expand...
Joe, you really should have an honest look into the facts of the JFK assassination before posting silliness about "magic bullets" or comparing it to the Tonkin incident. I've found that subject to be an accurate kook yardstick, and right now you're not measuring up.
 
joemailman said:
And those who accept convention also honestly believe that Oswald acted alone, the magic bullet actually performed as the Warren commission said it did and the Navy's destroyer was actually in danger of being sunk by the unknown NVM patrol boat thereby giving us the truthful and accurate Gulf of Tonkin "incident".

And GW bush is actually the elected president of your nation.
Click to expand...

Actually convention pretty much has it that the second Gulf of Tonkin incident (the one on August 4, 1964) was bogus.
 
i see drift all the time, but what annoys me is the hit n run. this is their basic programming:
10 make $claim (that we have heard before)
20 people challenge
30 poster defends without responding to challenge
40 rand($claim)
50 goto 10
okay i know i mixed syntax but you get the point
 
I see their drift all the time...

With NORAD...

"NORAD should have done something"

to "NORAD does intercepts all the time"

to "Intercepts happen in minutes"

or

"NORAD reacted slow on purpose"

to "The exercises confused NORAD so they didn't respond in time"

to "NORAD did nothing for over 2 hours"

Or there's:

"A few guys in the basement heard noises before the impact"

to "Lots of people report explosions in the basement before impact"

to "People in the basement all reported massive explosions"

Just about every CT claim seems to naturally move further and further from reality as time progresses... I think it's mainly a case of chinese whispers.

Paul Thompson (supposedly one of the "serious 9/11 truth investigators") now claims that there were hundreds of NORAD aircraft all around the USA just waiting to perform an intercept.

First you get "NORAD purposefully didn't intercept the aircraft"

then "NORAD lied about their testimony"

now "NORAD, the FAA, and the 9/11 Commission got together and faked both the NEADS and the FAA tapes"

-Andrew
 
Paul Thompson (supposedly one of the "serious 9/11 truth investigators") now claims that there were hundreds of NORAD aircraft all around the USA just waiting to perform an intercept.
Click to expand...
so then we must have hundreds of pilots in the truth movement wondering why they were never launched...

either that or theyre all in on it, just keeps getting bigger and bigger, i think the CTers are just mad because they are the only peopel in the country who ARENT paid shills
 
Don't forget that NORAD was order to stand down... and shoot UA93 out of the air :confused:
 
kevin said:
pulverized concrete is getting smaller and smaller as time goes on. truthseeker now has it down to dust particles.
Click to expand...
Actually WTC concrete dust is the smallest particle known to man.

It's true. :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom