Watching the debate on CNN the other night, it was incredible to me how they seemed to wish Ron Paul weren't there. He was barely mentioned during the AC360 post-debate coverage; according to someone online, he was mentioned twice by name, tied with Rick Perry. In comparison, Newt Gingrich was mentioned 25 times, Mitt Romney 15, and Rick Santorum 14. Transcript here.
It's not like he got fair treatment in the actual debate, either. When the moderator tried to skip him on the abortion question (he's an OB/GYN), the audience had to demand he get enough time to answer.
By the way, this has been going on for months. Even Jon Stewart has been making fun of Ron Paul's ridiculous treatment.
This isn't about whether or not you like Ron Paul, or whether he's crazy, so I don't want to hear anything about that. This is about media coverage that's inconsistent with his candidacy. Why is Ron Paul ignored? Or do you even agree with that? Maybe you think Ron Paul is treated fairly - I'd love to see the JREF Super Skeptics argue that point. I know it's ridiculous to call this a conspiracy, but if it's not, then what the hell is it?
It's not like he got fair treatment in the actual debate, either. When the moderator tried to skip him on the abortion question (he's an OB/GYN), the audience had to demand he get enough time to answer.
By the way, this has been going on for months. Even Jon Stewart has been making fun of Ron Paul's ridiculous treatment.
This isn't about whether or not you like Ron Paul, or whether he's crazy, so I don't want to hear anything about that. This is about media coverage that's inconsistent with his candidacy. Why is Ron Paul ignored? Or do you even agree with that? Maybe you think Ron Paul is treated fairly - I'd love to see the JREF Super Skeptics argue that point. I know it's ridiculous to call this a conspiracy, but if it's not, then what the hell is it?