• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Who will replace Bill O'Reilly?

corplinx

JREF Kid
Joined
Oct 22, 2002
Messages
8,952
Once Bill O'Reilly is sh*tcanned, its opens up the best hour of primetime on the most watched cable news network.

Who would you like Ailes and company to fill the gap with once Bill O'Reilly resigns in disgrace?
 
corplinx said:
Once Bill O'Reilly is sh*tcanned, its opens up the best hour of primetime on the most watched cable news network.

Who would you like Ailes and company to fill the gap with once Bill O'Reilly resigns in disgrace?

I don't think he'll be fired unless his ratings drastically, and over a long term, decline. Will that happen? I don't know because I can't really understand why anybody watches him now. I find him a blowhard, and an uninteresting one at that.

If he is replaced, I'd like to see something along the lines of Gretta Von Whatshername take that earlier spot.
 
Re: Re: Who will replace Bill O'Reilly?

Rob Lister said:
I don't think he'll be fired unless his ratings drastically, and over a long term, decline. Will that happen? I don't know because I can't really understand why anybody watches him now. I find him a blowhard, and an uninteresting one at that.

If he is replaced, I'd like to see something along the lines of Gretta Von Whatshername take that earlier spot.

But I am assuming the Scott Peterson case will be over by then, at which point she will have nothing to talk about.
 
Rob Lister said:
Sexual Harrassment suit, and probably a justifiable one, if not a justified one, at that.

I haven't read any of the stories (aside from the titles) but is OReilly claiming that none of it happened or is he using the "it was consensual conversation" defense?
 
ann coulter please

seriously I think this whole sexual harrassment thing is just a pr strategy to get liberals to like him more.
 
Re: Re: Re: Who will replace Bill O'Reilly?

pgwenthold said:
But I am assuming the Scott Peterson case will be over by then, at which point she will have nothing to talk about.

Gretta's smart and, while a bit too liberal for my taste, fair as well. She knows how to cut through rhetoric better than most any of the interviewers, with the possible exception of that big headed guy, Neil whatshisname (no relation to Gretta :) )
 
Nie Trink Wasser said:
ann coulter please

seriously I think this whole sexual harrassment thing is just a pr strategy to get liberals to like him more.

Ann wouldn't last a month (her message is both bland and spin-driven) but I'd really like to see her and Gretta mud wrestle. Winner takes the 8:00 spot.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Who will replace Bill O'Reilly?

Rob Lister said:
Gretta's smart and, while a bit too liberal for my taste, fair as well. She knows how to cut through rhetoric better than most any of the interviewers, with the possible exception of that big headed guy, Neil whatshisname (no relation to Gretta :) )

Does she know how to do anything but sensational trials? That's all I've ever seen her talk about. When she tries to talk about anything else, it is a complete bore.

Besides, I find her to be most unattractive. Not Ann Coulter ugly, but her face is just bizarre.

I think they should completely switch gears and get someone like Rachael Ray from the Food Network or Samantha Brown from the Travel Channel. Now that would be fun.
 
Wow. How'd I miss this story?

Eww... those details are kinda ikky.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Who will replace Bill O'Reilly?

pgwenthold said:
Does she know how to do anything but sensational trials? That's all I've ever seen her talk about. When she tries to talk about anything else, it is a complete bore.

Besides, I find her to be most unattractive. Not Ann Coulter ugly, but her face is just bizarre.

I think they should completely switch gears and get someone like Rachael Ray from the Food Network or Samantha Brown from the Travel Channel. Now that would be fun.

Rachael Ray. That's the ticket. It took me a while to warm up to her. At first I thought she was just scary-insane. Yea, I'd like to see Ann and Rachael mud wrestle. Or Rachael and Samantha.

Either's good.
 
The worst thing that could happen:
The Sean Hannity Factor


When I have been able to stomach H&C it was because of Alan Colmes.
 
Hire Jim Lehrer away from PBS for some jawdropping salary, then laugh all the way to the bank while the lefites foam at the mouth trying to claim Fox still isn't "fair and balanced."

Regarding Coulter: Much as I love her, never. She's not an interviewer; she's an interviewee.
 
Hello Rob (and a few others),

You seem to know quite a bit about what's going on in O'Reilley's personal involvements (from some of the posted comments) ... perhaps you can clue us all in on this recent legal case as well as his relations with his family. Then you can forcast with precision paranormal certainty as to the outcomes from all of the above.

Thank you.

OK -- it's a joke -- but let's be objective here; none of us know what's really going on.
 
BPSCG said:
Hire Jim Lehrer away from PBS for some jawdropping salary, then laugh all the way to the bank while the lefites foam at the mouth trying to claim Fox still isn't "fair and balanced.". [/B]

But Fox would never hire a Lehrer to fill that slot because they aren't "fair and balanced" (not that any other news organizations are either, you won't see PBS or NPR hiring Ann Coulter)

There is no spoon and there is no such thing as "no spin"

Unless there is some tape recordings that are very graphic I think O'Reilly will be keeping his job, he's a cash cow for that network.
 
HarryKeogh said:
But Fox would never hire a Lehrer to fill that slot because they aren't "fair and balanced" (not that any other news organizations are either, you won't see PBS or NPR hiring Ann Coulter)

There is no spoon and there is no such thing as "no spin"

Unless there is some tape recordings that are very graphic I think O'Reilly will be keeping his job, he's a cash cow for that network.

On stern this morning they said there were recordings. Of course, its stern we are talking about. He's been dedication an hour each day to propaganda for a good while in his attempt to get back at Bush for the FCC fiasco.
 
corplinx said:
On stern this morning they said there were recordings. Of course, its stern we are talking about. He's been dedication an hour each day to propaganda for a good while in his attempt to get back at Bush for the FCC fiasco.

You can find the legal papers with all the steamy details on www.thesmokinggun.com . It appears, with the detailed conversations in the lawsuit, that at least some of it is on a recording.
 

Back
Top Bottom