Mephisto
Philosopher
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2005
- Messages
- 6,064
I've been involved in a few discussions about the inadequacies of the VP's idea of hunter's safety and someone brought up the question (which I'm sure several people here have already considered), "What would have happened had Whittington been the one to shoot Cheney?"
Most people agreed that he would have been dead in the field for an apparent assassination attempt, but even if the SS hadn't "neutralized the threat" would the incident have gone over 18 hours without being reported? Would Faux News still have downplayed the seriousness of the incident? Would we be subject to 24 hour news coverage on the condition of the VP, complete with diagrams, CSI-type animations showing the bullet's (or pellets) pathway through his tons of body fat, surgeon's comments, X-Rays, MRIs, ballistic expert's testimony and an hourly Toxicologist's report regarding the danger of lead in the bloodstream?
Just wondering aloud what the implications would have been had the foot been in the other glove?
Most people agreed that he would have been dead in the field for an apparent assassination attempt, but even if the SS hadn't "neutralized the threat" would the incident have gone over 18 hours without being reported? Would Faux News still have downplayed the seriousness of the incident? Would we be subject to 24 hour news coverage on the condition of the VP, complete with diagrams, CSI-type animations showing the bullet's (or pellets) pathway through his tons of body fat, surgeon's comments, X-Rays, MRIs, ballistic expert's testimony and an hourly Toxicologist's report regarding the danger of lead in the bloodstream?
Just wondering aloud what the implications would have been had the foot been in the other glove?
