AdMan
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2010
- Messages
- 10,293
I read the latest op-ed from David Brooks in the NY Times, and he raised some questions I've been wondering about for a while. These questions have been amplified by what's been happening in the Republican search for a candidate to challenge Obama.
Is there no one left in the Republican party with enough balls to stand up to these extreme elements in the party, to make a point about how radical these elements are, and how far from how modern, young America thinks? They can't all have all bought into this anti-intellectualism, anti-education, anti-science platform that all Republicans now appear to be supporting, can they?
Way back when I was a freshman in college in the late 80s, I joined the Young Republicans. Yes, I was a progressive (and even a coming-out-of-the-closet atheist) in many ways, but I still felt I shared many of the GOP's goals, particularly in the area of economics and fiscal restraint. (I didn't feel, for example, that my atheism conflicted with belonging to the Republican party--believe it or not, you 21st centurers!)
That day is long gone. I no longer think I could ever support a Republican candidate. They have alienated me, and I think many others, by their unyielding focus on religiosity and social conservatism that I think makes no sense in the 21st century.
I don't miss the Republican party, but I am amazed that they seem to so blindly cling to outmoded and distasteful ideas such as the ones that are on display every day in the current GOP primary campaigns.
Is there really no one prominent in the party who is willing to challenge this, to try to bring the GOP out from what to me and to many seems to be the Middle Ages?
Or are they simply being drowned out by everyone else?
All across the nation, there are mainstream Republicans lamenting how the party has grown more and more insular, more and more rigid. This year, they have an excellent chance to defeat President Obama, yet the wingers have trashed the party’s reputation by swinging from one embarrassing and unelectable option to the next: Bachmann, Trump, Cain, Perry, Gingrich, Santorum.
But where have these party leaders been over the past five years, when all the forces that distort the G.O.P. were metastasizing? Where were they during the rise of Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck? Where were they when Arizona passed its beyond-the-fringe immigration law? Where were they in the summer of 2011 when the House Republicans rejected even the possibility of budget compromise?
Is there no one left in the Republican party with enough balls to stand up to these extreme elements in the party, to make a point about how radical these elements are, and how far from how modern, young America thinks? They can't all have all bought into this anti-intellectualism, anti-education, anti-science platform that all Republicans now appear to be supporting, can they?
Way back when I was a freshman in college in the late 80s, I joined the Young Republicans. Yes, I was a progressive (and even a coming-out-of-the-closet atheist) in many ways, but I still felt I shared many of the GOP's goals, particularly in the area of economics and fiscal restraint. (I didn't feel, for example, that my atheism conflicted with belonging to the Republican party--believe it or not, you 21st centurers!)
That day is long gone. I no longer think I could ever support a Republican candidate. They have alienated me, and I think many others, by their unyielding focus on religiosity and social conservatism that I think makes no sense in the 21st century.
I don't miss the Republican party, but I am amazed that they seem to so blindly cling to outmoded and distasteful ideas such as the ones that are on display every day in the current GOP primary campaigns.
Is there really no one prominent in the party who is willing to challenge this, to try to bring the GOP out from what to me and to many seems to be the Middle Ages?
Or are they simply being drowned out by everyone else?
Last edited: