im sorry if this question has been answered a bajillion times, but im new to jref and the search layout is freaking me out.
anyways, i suppose this isnt too hard to answer. ive always been fascinated by the "exotic" particles and such that physicists believe are out there. one would be the meson.
from out of this world by stephen webb, i understand it is (a quark and antiquark), but im confused as to how such a particle could exist. he mentioned a "bound" state, but failed to define it. (maybe that has something to do with it???)
from my most basic knowledge (and trust me, although i read up on modern physics, half the time i am in way over my head), i know that a quark-antiquark will annihilate to create photons. so how can a meson even be considered a particle if it annihilates itself? or does it? i have no clue.
any help would be grand.
anyways, i suppose this isnt too hard to answer. ive always been fascinated by the "exotic" particles and such that physicists believe are out there. one would be the meson.
from out of this world by stephen webb, i understand it is (a quark and antiquark), but im confused as to how such a particle could exist. he mentioned a "bound" state, but failed to define it. (maybe that has something to do with it???)
from my most basic knowledge (and trust me, although i read up on modern physics, half the time i am in way over my head), i know that a quark-antiquark will annihilate to create photons. so how can a meson even be considered a particle if it annihilates itself? or does it? i have no clue.
any help would be grand.