He tired this before and it flopped. The only bids were obviously fake pranks.
I think Geller took down the auction before the silly bidding got out of hand.
Randi should bid on it![]()
How do you know it's not a real auction. Seller has 100% positive feedback. Some of you seem to be jumping to conclusions without facts to back you up.
I wouldn't risk bidding though.
Who said it's not a real auction? No-one here said that.
It looks very much like an official NSPCC charity listing, the profile of the seller is here: http://cgi3.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewUserPage&userid=dreamauctionfullstop
However, if you want to pursue your odd reasoning, you might want to examine the 5 feedback links, they are all invalid links. That in itself could be cause for suspicion, as is that fact that two of the feedbacks are from sellers with only 1 feedback themselves. Also, 100% positive feedback doesn't mean much when you only have 5 feedback in total.
That is just an example, in case anyone did suggest the auction is fake, which they have not. It seems very genuine.
What is being questioned is the validity of Uri's claims in the listing.
I suggest that it is you who is "jumping to conclusions without facts to back you up".
Sheesh, take it easy. If you're looking for a fight you got the wrong guy. I got the impression from this:
"Does this blatantly false advertising violate eBay policy?"
I think they intend to deliver on the auction, but I wouldn't risk it.
Done.You take it easy, ...

Sheesh, take it easy. If you're looking for a fight you got the wrong guy. I got the impression from this:
"Does this blatantly false advertising violate eBay policy?"
I think they intend to deliver on the auction, but I wouldn't risk it.
This is where you will have a problem. You haven't proven Gellar is not psychic. The fact is there is evidence that he is. That some people keep saying he cheats does not make it true, even if it is true.I was referring to his claims of being proven the genuine article in terms of psychic ability. That seemed to be the drawcard for the auction, the reason why anybody would want to spend time with him or be "lectured" to by him. That claim is false. If someone didnt know who he was but bid on this auction based on the information provided by Gellar, they would be the victim of a deception, even if it is for charity.
If it was true yes I would be fine with that. This is easlily verified so is not a good analogy.If a minor actor made the same offer on eBay by claiming to be an Oscar winner, would you be OK with that, regardless of where the money went or if it was a "genuine offer"?
Where is the evidence that Gellar is psychic?