• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Truthers, what if WTC7 didn't catch fire?

Orphia Nay

Penguilicious Spodmaster
Tagger
Orphia Nay
Joined
May 2, 2005
Messages
52,456
Location
Australia
Truthers, what would have happened if WTC7 didn't catch fire?

How did whoever you think did 9/11 make sure it caught fire?

Please detail the mechanisms involved. Thanks.
 
Orphia Nay said:
Truthers, what would have happened if WTC7 didn't catch fire?

How did whoever you think did 9/11 make sure it caught fire?

Please detail the mechanisms involved. Thanks.
Click to expand...


Which truthers are you asking? The non-government truthers or the government truthers?
 
Orphia Nay said:
Truthers, what would have happened if WTC7 didn't catch fire?

How did whoever you think did 9/11 make sure it caught fire?

Please detail the mechanisms involved. Thanks.
Click to expand...

You trapped a troll, are you happy now! March Madness, and we are stuck babysitting a troll!

UBL would say god made it happen! Like 911 truth, not too smart.
 
SpringHallConvert said:
I really don't know. Maybe it was all fire, maybe it wasn't.

It certainly looked a little suspicious.
Click to expand...

I got a hammer, I'm going this jello to the wall if it is the last thing I do!

SHC: How in Altana's name did the WTC collapses look suspicious to you? Do you have reason to believe that it was suspicious? What should it have looked like? Would you please answer these questions?
 
Mudcat said:
SHC: How in Altana's name did the WTC collapses look suspicious to you? Do you have reason to believe that it was suspicious? What should it have looked like? Would you please answer these questions?
Click to expand...

WTC7 came down just as many controlled demolitions do. Most of the buildings I've seen destroyed by fire have staggered or only partial collapses, and over a much longer period of time. WTC7 came right down all at once. There seemed to be little to no resistance, either. As if all the support columns bearing the building's weight gave out at once. I realize that's inconvenient for you, but facts are facts.

"But, but, but NIST says it ain't so and the government wouldn't lie to us!"

Ha, ha, ha!
 
The fact of the matter is, WTC7 is completely irrelevant to the whole 9/11 "inside job" debate, because even if WTC7 collapsed due only to fires, it still wouldn't necessarily mean the U.S. government wasn't complicit in the attacks.
 
SpringHallConvert said:
The fact of the matter is, WTC7 is completely irrelevant to the whole 9/11 "inside job" debate, because even if WTC7 collapsed due only to fires, it still wouldn't necessarily mean the U.S. government wasn't complicit in the attacks.
Click to expand...

Ha, ha.
 
I've been making basically this same point for a while. The only way the bad guys could've known 7 would be hit by debris would be if They aimed the collapse. And that, by definition, means that North Tower was bought down outside of its own footprint. Of course, that still leaves the question of how They managed to know that none of their demo charges would be disrupted. The only other option is that the bad guys planted charges in a building they hoped would be hit by debris, and hoped that said debris wouldn't disrupt the explosives. And no, the plane theory doesn't work, since WTC 7 was of no real importance and the failed plane crashed after 7 was hit by debris.

It is fun to watch Truthers dodge the question of what actually hit 7, though. They like to act like it spontaneously caught fire, instead of having a piece of a skyscraper fall on it.

SpringHallConvert said:
The fact of the matter is, WTC7 is completely irrelevant to the whole 9/11 "inside job" debate, because even if WTC7 collapsed due only to fires, it still wouldn't necessarily mean the U.S. government wasn't complicit in the attacks.
Click to expand...
Sweet mercy, you made a logical point for once.

Of course, there's plenty of proof against WTC 1 and 2 being CD'd as well, and literally no evidence of USG complicity, but good effort. I'm not sure why you even bothered to enter the thread and start arguing, since you don't actually believe in CD, just US complicity with Al Qaeda. Or maybe you do. Your constant backpedalling is annoying, especially when you admit you have just as "little" evidence as we do, which makes it hypocritical as well.
 
000063 said:
I've been making basically this same point for a while. The only way the bad guys could've known 7 would be hit by debris would be if They aimed the collapse. And that, by definition, means that North Tower was bought down outside of its own footprint.
Click to expand...

- WTC7 fell onto its own footprint. Proof of CD!!
- WTC1 and 2 didn't. Proof of CD!!
- Free Fall speed with no resistance. Proof of CD!!
- Some truther measures a fall of 0.7g for WTC1. proof of CD!!!

You see, truther logic.
 
The funny thing is that every single one of those is false, yet I've seen Truthers lay claim to all of them. Some even make the mutually contradicting assertions.
 
SpringHallConvert said:
WTC7 came down just as many controlled demolitions do. Most of the buildings I've seen destroyed by fire have staggered or only partial collapses, and over a much longer period of time. WTC7 came right down all at once. There seemed to be little to no resistance, either. As if all the support columns bearing the building's weight gave out at once.
Click to expand...
I doubt you have seen any collapses yourself including the collapses of 9/11 save maybe long after the fact (I have, by the way) but buildings can and do collapse for reasons other than CD all over the world. And they all look pretty similar.

SHC said:
I realize that's inconvenient for you, but facts are facts.
Click to expand...

IronyMeterSplode.jpg
 
Last edited:
SpringHallConvert said:
WTC7 came down just as many controlled demolitions do. Most of the buildings I've seen destroyed by fire have staggered or only partial collapses, and over a much longer period of time. WTC7 came right down all at once. There seemed to be little to no resistance, either. As if all the support columns bearing the building's weight gave out at once. I realize that's inconvenient for you, but facts are facts.

"But, but, but NIST says it ain't so and the government wouldn't lie to us!"

Ha, ha, ha!
Click to expand...

So you can produce explosive residue? Please tell us all about it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom