• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

TLB proves C-130 Flight Path

Reheat

Illuminator
Reheat
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
3,693
Location
In Space
So TLB, the Ranquis clone, is spouting the disproven C-130 Flight Path that has been promoted by CIT. After the Tribby Video (close up view) was released I asked CIT to provide the C-130 Flight Path from their immediately South of the Mall position to the position we see in the video. Of course, as with all of CIT's garbage there has been no flight path and no math to prove the C-130 could fly this within the known time constraints. Here is the chance to provide the Flight Path and math to prove this could be done.

I predict all we'll get is "Are you calling the ANC witnesses liars"? Did they all hallucinate the exact same flight path from the NW at the same time?

Oh, you can use that Alpo graphic as many here likely haven't seen it. Why don't you throw that in for a good laugh this evening. The floor is yours TLB. Let's see some aerodynamic math.
 
It amazes me that Ranquis and their fanboys dismiss hard evidence from whatever source, be it RADES, Tribby, Looney, DCA, etc., in favor of their 13 cherry-picked and mutually-exclusive witnesses.

At one point I thought that Ranquis could be engaged in real debate, but I've come to realize that they are too deeply invested in their fantasy to permit anything to rock the little world they've made for themselves.

Craig, Aldo, if you're reading this, which I have little doubt you are, you need some help. It's out there. Seek it.
 
Wouldn't the Tribby video 've provided great footage of the DC-130 approaching the pentagon, had it actually came in from the Northeast?

 
Just an FYI, I have Tribby's original archived. It is a 20.2 meg Quicktime movie (save target as).

Tribbey Video
 
Last edited:
Reheat, I thought people wanted to eliminate "call out" threads in this sub-forum, no?
 
The impetus is on them to provide the evidence for their claims. No need to poke them with a stick unless you're really taken with schadenfreude.
 
Cool video. I never saw that before. however the guy claimed that there was an explosion on top of the pentagon which completely disproves the official theory.
 
JoeyDonuts said:
The impetus is on them to provide the evidence for their claims. No need to poke them with a stick unless you're really taken with schadenfreude.
Click to expand...

yes I agree. Leave them to their silliness. No one but a few here are actually listening to them, and it keeps them busy and out of trouble.

TAM:)
 
jhunter1163 said:
It amazes me that Ranquis and their fanboys dismiss hard evidence from whatever source, be it RADES, Tribby, Looney, DCA, etc., in favor of their 13 cherry-picked and mutually-exclusive witnesses.

At one point I thought that Ranquis could be engaged in real debate, but I've come to realize that they are too deeply invested in their fantasy to permit anything to rock the little world they've made for themselves.

Craig, Aldo, if you're reading this, which I have little doubt you are, you need some help. It's out there. Seek it.
Click to expand...

What's is so cherry picked about the 13 witnesses?

Find 13 others who saw it fly on the South side, and were in a position to see it.


Find 13 others who saw the plane ACTUALLY hit the poles inbound.
 
Last edited:
roundhead said:
What's is so cherry picked about the 13 witnesses?

Find 13 others who saw it fly on the South side, and were in a position to see it.


Find 13 others who saw the plane ACTUALLY hit the poles inbound.
Click to expand...

There ARE witnesses who saw the plane on the south side of the Citgo. They're dismissed as plants or liars.

There ARE witnesses who saw the plane hit the poles. They're dismissed as plants or liars.

What makes you think any witness I found would be treated any differently?
 
There are witnesses that say that it was south of the offical flightpath, they get wrtten off as lairs too.
 
You must realize that unless they are interviewed and cooberated by Ranquis, the best, most honest investigators in the world, they don't count.
 
jhunter1163 said:
And to answer this part specifically, Ranquis conveniently leave out that at least eleven of the thirteen saw the plane hit the Pentagon. (Only Turcios and Paik didn't actually see the impact.)
Click to expand...

But that only means that they were fooled by the greatest, most elaborate magic trick of all time.
 
roundhead said:
What's is so cherry picked about the 13 witnesses?

Find 13 others who saw it fly on the South side, and were in a position to see it.


Find 13 others who saw the plane ACTUALLY hit the poles inbound.
Click to expand...
What Ranke and company like to go after are individual inconsistencies in witness testimony and ignore the overall agreement in the collective witness body -- including their own -- that the plane hit the building. Some truther sites acknowledge this, other like Ranke and CIT fail to do so, there are a number of listings which collected witness accounts one of those comes from here
 
roundhead said:
What's is so cherry picked about the 13 witnesses?

Find 13 others who saw it fly on the South side, and were in a position to see it.


Find 13 others who saw the plane ACTUALLY hit the poles inbound.
Click to expand...
13 CIT witnesses actually point to the south path.

RADAR has the south path.

FDR has south path.

CIT is wrong, you believe CIT.

Boger, a CIT witness watched 77 enter the Pentagon.
CIT have nut case ideas, you like CIT ideas.

All CIT witnesses agree 77 hit the Pentagon.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom