Here is some info about an atheistic professor named Peter Singer who Time Magazine called one of the 100 Most Influential People in the World in 2005, and a New Yorker Magazine article described as the "most influential" philosopher alive.
Here are some of the troubling beliefs of this influential atheistic professor.
From the World Magazine article "Same-sex marriage? Euthanasia? Child's play issues in the avant-garde philosophy of Peter Singer" Marvin Olasky
"For example, when I asked him {Singer} last month about necrophilia (what if two people make an agreement that whoever lives longest can have sexual relations with the corpse of the person who dies first?), he said, "There's no moral problem with that." Concerning bestiality (should people have sex with animals, seen as willing participants?), he responded, "I would ask, 'What's holding you back from a more fulfilling relationship?' [but] it's not wrong inherently in a moral sense."
If the 21st century becomes a Singer century, we will also see legal infanticide of born children who are ill or who have ill older siblings in need of their body parts. Question: What about parents conceiving and giving birth to a child specifically to kill him, take his organs, and transplant them into their ill older children? Mr. Singer: "It's difficult to warm to parents who can take such a detached view, [but] they're not doing something really wrong in itself." Is there anything wrong with a society in which children are bred for spare parts on a massive scale? "No."
http://www.worldmag.com/articles/9987
Singer was recently a professor at Princeton. He still might be there but I'm not sure.
Here are some of the troubling beliefs of this influential atheistic professor.
From the World Magazine article "Same-sex marriage? Euthanasia? Child's play issues in the avant-garde philosophy of Peter Singer" Marvin Olasky
"For example, when I asked him {Singer} last month about necrophilia (what if two people make an agreement that whoever lives longest can have sexual relations with the corpse of the person who dies first?), he said, "There's no moral problem with that." Concerning bestiality (should people have sex with animals, seen as willing participants?), he responded, "I would ask, 'What's holding you back from a more fulfilling relationship?' [but] it's not wrong inherently in a moral sense."
If the 21st century becomes a Singer century, we will also see legal infanticide of born children who are ill or who have ill older siblings in need of their body parts. Question: What about parents conceiving and giving birth to a child specifically to kill him, take his organs, and transplant them into their ill older children? Mr. Singer: "It's difficult to warm to parents who can take such a detached view, [but] they're not doing something really wrong in itself." Is there anything wrong with a society in which children are bred for spare parts on a massive scale? "No."
http://www.worldmag.com/articles/9987
Singer was recently a professor at Princeton. He still might be there but I'm not sure.
Last edited:
