• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The paranormal is boring

Interesting article. I usually love watching shows about the supernatural. I was a big fan of the X-Files, Buffy, and Angel. But this latest batch is incredibly dull and poorly written.
NBC's Medium stars Patricia Arquette. She plays Allison Dubois, a criminal consultant and mother of three who solves crimes by relying upon clairvoyant insights.
I couldn't get past the halfway point of the pilot, it's incredibly lame.
This week, Fox tweaked an infernal concept and unveiled Point Pleasant, a teen drama that continues in the Devil's Spawn tradition of The Bad Seed, Rosemary's Baby and The Omen. ... Nobody, including Christina, realizes she is actually Satan's daughter.
I wish it was as interesting as that sounds. It's the O.C., with a "spooky" couple of characters, which happen to be extremely boring, and set in NJ. The only weird thing about it is that the sun sets over the "Atlantic" ocean. It's a pathetic show about which teen or parent sleeps with whom this week.
HBO's Carnivale, which recently returned to TMN for a second season, is built around the same ultimate battle. Does anybody care?
Carnivale is interesting enough. Only problem is, the pace is glacial. Nothing happens, ever. At this pace, the conficlt will begin in about 5 seasons and be resolved when I'm 90.
Even new TV shows steeped within a scientific framework resonate with a strange, paranormal feel. CBS's Numb3rs, which debuts tomorrow, is essentially a crime procedural. The twist here is that the brother of one FBI agent is actually a math phenom who uses his prodigious gift to help solve crimes.
I'm looking forward to this show. According to a site jzs posted, CBS is really trying to get the math right. If they do, it will have nothing supernatural about it and will seem like "magic" only if you don't understand the math, which says more about the viewer than about the show.
 
Huh - you think that's bad...

We have the 'X Files' set in Glasgow!!! I kid you not - 'Sea of Souls' on BBC 1. Supposedly set in the Parapsycology Dept. of Glasgow University... (Actually, no - they don't have such a department - thank goodness!)

Actually... I grudgingly have to admit it's growing on me. They have wheeled out the entire Scottish acting profession yet again - Week1: Taggart (Scottish detective series) Week2: Sea of Souls... Week3... panto at the Lyceum!!!

DeVega
 
paranormal

I'd agree. Working with aspects of nature that one doesn't yet fully understand (so-called 'paranormal') can be incredibly boring!
 
Working with aspects of nature that one doesn't yet fully understand (so-called 'paranormal') can be incredibly boring!
Of course working with aspects of nature that don't really exist is equally boring.

Wacthing people delude themselves into beliefs in magic and super-abilities is also quite boring.
 
Re: paranormal

songstress said:
I'd agree. Working with aspects of nature that one doesn't yet fully understand (so-called 'paranormal')...
Well that's not a good definition. Your failure to understand something does not make it paranormal.

There are, of course, aspects of nature which no-one fully understands. These are not classed as paranormal either. Working with aspects of nature that no-one fully understands is called "scientific research", and the people who do it find it interesting.

The "paranormal" consists of things which have not been shown to be "aspects of nature": things which have traditionally appealed to the superstitious, but which have never been shown to actually exist. Looking for them is going to be boring... especially as people have been looking for centuries with no success. It's like fishing in a river out of which no-one's hooked anything but rubbish.
 
Donks said:
I'm looking forward to this show. According to a site jzs posted, CBS is really trying to get the math right. If they do, it will have nothing supernatural about it and will seem like "magic" only if you don't understand the math, which says more about the viewer than about the show.

I saw the premier of Numb3rs.

Boooooring!
 
Luke T. said:
I saw the premier of Numb3rs.

Boooooring!

I really liked it. Though I do have rservations about how many plots they can come up with without it becoming like the one Foghorn Leghorn cartoon where Foghorn is playing hide & seek with his genius nephew. Foghorn hides in a barrel, the nephew pulls out a chalk board, does a few equations, then take s ashovel nad digs foghorn up right next to him, whereupon Foghorn looks at the barrel he was hiding in and says "I'm not gonna look, I might..I say I just might....be in theah". I really worry that the show will have that feel after they use up the 'realistic' plots.
 
Songstress said:
I'd agree. Working with aspects of nature that one doesn't yet fully understand (so-called 'paranormal') can be incredibly boring!
Welcome! I think the article was more about TV shows and movies than about the "reality" of the supernatural.

I couldn't watch Medium. The premise was absurd and revolting.

I thought Numb3rs was mildly interesting, but I don't have high hopes for the long run. Let's see when it jumps the shark.

~~ Paul
 
Re Numb3rs

Donks said:
...
I'm looking forward to this show. According to a site jzs posted, CBS is really trying to get the math right. If they do, it will have nothing supernatural about it and will seem like "magic" only if you don't understand the math, which says more about the viewer than about the show.

I was in the unaired pilot of the show, which was originally going to be set in Boston. They had me doing 3 card monti in the background while David Krumholtz was doing some dialog explaining the odds of the "game". The dialog was laughably wrong!
 
Peter S. said:
Re Numb3rs



I was in the unaired pilot of the show, which was originally going to be set in Boston. They had me doing 3 card monti in the background while David Krumholtz was doing some dialog explaining the odds of the "game". The dialog was laughably wrong!

This is so sad on so many levels.... :D
 
Re: Re: paranormal

Dr Adequate said:

The "paranormal" consists of things which have not been shown to be "aspects of nature": things which have traditionally appealed to the superstitious, but which have never been shown to actually exist. Looking for them is going to be boring... especially as people have been looking for centuries with no success. It's like fishing in a river out of which no-one's hooked anything but rubbish.

Well said. That's as good a summation of paranormal 'research' as I have ever seen.

I take my hat off to you. :th:
 
Paul C. Anagnostopoulos said:
Welcome! I think the article was more about TV shows and movies than about the "reality" of the supernatural.

I couldn't watch Medium. The premise was absurd and revolting.

I thought Numb3rs was mildly interesting, but I don't have high hopes for the long run. Let's see when it jumps the shark.

~~ Paul

It jumped the shark in the first episode. The only numbers involved were "how many cliches can we cram into one show?"
 
It looks like CBS is trying to do another CSI with a twist in Numb3rs. After watching the first one I think they would have been better off with CSI Green Acres.
 
SRW said:
After watching the first one I think they would have been better off with CSI Green Acres.

"Golly Mr. Douglas! By the downward angle of the blow I say that Ms. Lisa was killed with a gen-u-ine dirtberger!"

"I'd test fer DNA, but Arnold says that thars a backlog at the outhouse.. I mean, lab."
 

Back
Top Bottom