• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Braxton County/Flatwoods Monster --

Crossbow

Seeking Honesty and Sanity
Joined
Oct 23, 2001
Messages
14,596
Location
Charleston, WV
The Braxton County/Flatwoods Monster --

Hello everybody!

I am trying to fortify myself for an upcoming battle with a believer in a government sponsored cover-up.

As for the details, Frank Feschino Jr. heard about a UFO/paranormal sighting that occurred in Flatwoods, WV (which is in Braxton County) on September 12th, 1952. Anyway, he eventually found some government documents about the sighting and concluded that there was an actual ecounter with an extra-terrestial and the evil, nasty government covered the whole thing up, and then proceeded to write a book about it (The Braxton County Monster: The Cover-Up of the Flatwoods Monster Revealed).

Anyway, I plan to attend his book signing which will be this Sunday (16 OCT 2004), at 4:00 PM, at the Charleston (WV) Civic Center.

I also plan on taking my copy of the Joe Nickell that he wrote about this event for Skeptical Inquirer.

I know that it is asking a great deal, but if there are any other Skeptics out there, I sure would appreciate it if you could attend as well.

Thanks in advance!

http://wvgazette.com/section/News/Today/2004101137

Author follows the trail of the Braxton County Monster

...

Feschino discovered that UFOs were spotted all over the eastern United States on the night the Flatwoods Monster was seen, including sightings in Washington, D.C.; Virginia; Maryland and Tennessee. Government officials explained the hundreds of individual sightings as a single meteor, but Feschino didn’t believe that a single meteor could be seen in so many different places, at different times, and going in different directions. He smelled a government cover-up.

...

Feschino argues the Braxton County Monster was in fact the occupant of a damaged UFO that crashed after a dogfight over the Atlantic Ocean.

...


http://www.csicop.org/si/2000-11/i-files.html

Investigative Files
The Flatwoods UFO Monster


...

Johnny Lockard, 95, told me that virtually everyone who had seen the alleged flying saucer in 1952 recognized it for what it was: a meteor. He, his daughter Betty Jean, and her husband Bill Sumpter said that the fireball had been seen on a relatively horizontal trajectory in various states. In fact, according to a former local newspaper editor, "There is no doubt that a meteor of considerable proportion flashed across the heavens that Friday night since it was visible in at least three states -- Maryland, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia" (Byrne 1966). The meteor explanation contrasts with the fanciful notions of Sanderson (1967). He cites several persons who each saw a single glowing object. Although observing that "All of the objects were traveling in the same direction and apparently at the same speed and at exactly the same time," he fails to draw the obvious conclusion: that there was one object, albeit variously described. (For example, one report said the object landed on a nearby knoll, while another described it as "disintegrating in the air with a rain of ashes.") Instead of suspecting that people were mistaken or that they saw a meteor that broke apart, Sanderson asserts that "to be logical" we should believe that "a flight of aerial machines" were "maneuvering in formation." For some reason the craft went out of control, with one landing, rather than crashing, at Flatwoods, and its pilot emerged "in a space suit." Observed, it headed back to the spaceship which -- like two others that "crashed" -- soon "vaporized" (Sanderson 1967).

...
 
OOOh. Son of Mothman.

Did the person who saw this follow a warm garden hose up a mountainside by any chance?
 
Are you planning to confront the guy at the book signing? That should be interesting. Give us a trip report.

I imagine it's difficult to trace the details of an event that happened in 1952.

~~ Paul
 
Tricky said:
I would catagorize this "flying saucer" as a Braxton hick's contraption.
sorry
I hope others can appreciate just how funny this is :D

....gotta go warm a bottle....
 
Paul C. Anagnostopoulos said:
Are you planning to confront the guy at the book signing? That should be interesting. Give us a trip report.

I imagine it's difficult to trace the details of an event that happened in 1952.

~~ Paul

Yes, I do plan to confront him.

I will take along several copies of the Joe Nickell article to serve as my sword and sheild (as it were).

I will also take some photos and post them and an after-action report when things wrap up.

Bye for now!
 
Tricky said:
I would catagorize this "flying saucer" as a Braxton hick's contraption.






sorry


oooh. And people complain about my puns. I suppose yours just came natally, from a placenta back of the mind.
 
jj said:
oooh. And people complain about my puns. I suppose yours just came natally, from a placenta back of the mind.
It's a curse. I dream in puns.

But as you well know, the louder the groans, the better the pun.
 
Tricky said:
It's a curse. I dream in puns.

But as you well know, the louder the groans, the better the pun.

I must admit, since I've joined this board, the puns have really groan on me...
 
Abridged Event Report

Abridged Event Report

Hello all!

I went to the presentation that I mentioned at the start of this thread earlier today. Took some notes, took some photographs, asked a few questions, and here is what I found out.

Date and Location: October 17, 2004 at 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM

Presenter: Frank Feschino, Jr. author of Alien Visitation in the Woods.

Topic: concerning the large number of UFO sightings that occurred in 1952 which culminated in the sighting of the Braxton County Monster, or Flatwoods Monster on September 12, 1952.

1) Research done:
a) The author made extensive use of Project Bluebook documents (he said that he was the first person in over 50 years to look at these documents),
b) Newspaper articles from the time were used,
c) Experts consulted (Stan Friedman was the only name he mentioned) and,
d) Interviews with some surviving witnesses.

2) Findings:
a) There were more UFO sightings in 1952 (1501) than any other year that was covered by Bluebook.
b) On the evening of September 12, 1952 there were many reports of meteor-like objects sightings in Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, Kentucky, Tennessee.
c) The US military was in the process at this time of working with new jet planes and a new generation of advanced jets.

3) Claims made regarding the many UFO sightings of September 12, 1952:
a) Claims that the UFOs stopped in flight,
b) The UFOs changed course,
c) The UFOs landed (not crashed but landed),
d) Many UFOs were involved (not just the one in Flatwoods),
e) The USAF fighter planes intercepted, followed, and fired upon some of the UFOs, and

4) Claims made regarding the Flatwoods/Braxton County Monster:
a) The object that was seen was a downed alien spacecraft (perhaps damaged by at attack from the USAF air defense network),
b) The creature was seen was an actual extra-terrestrial in a shuttle-craft.
c) The multitude of UFO sightings were due to the many other alien spacecraft that were sent to Earth in order to rescue the downed occupant.

5) Conclusions made:
a) There was a government “cover-up” of the event,
b) There were seven people who saw the monster (six of whom were boys about 10 to 14 years old) for one or two seconds before running away scared.
c) No direct evidence has been obtained to support his claims. Note: I asked about this, and he did confirm that he did not have any direct evidence to support the claims (even though he also said that there were pieces of an alien spacecraft were seen).
d) It seemed to me, that the author had some poor interview techniques with the one adult who saw the monster. Example: he would find some new data, ask her about it, then she explain how the new data related to some other person, however it does not appear that Feschino corroborated the additional data. Feschino explained that he interviewed this woman hundreds of times.

Well for a short report, this sure ran on a good bit.

When I get the photos developed (I hope they turn out all right), I will post them, and please let me know if there is anyone who would like a more detailed report.

Thanks much!
 
a) The author made extensive use of Project Bluebook documents (he said that he was the first person in over 50 years to look at these documents),
I don't see how that last statement could possibly be true. From what I've found on the internet, people were investigating project blue book well into the late 60's. So at the most he can claim that he's the first person in over 30 years to look at the documents. Which I also doubt is true.
 

Back
Top Bottom