• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Anthrax Truth Movement

Well, they missed a couple of theories.

4. That Ivins was part of a group that did it.

5. That Ivins worked alone, but tapped into an illicit bioweapons program that the U.S. government can't afford to be on the front pages.
 
Funny how the article cites reputable people from mainstream journalism and the scientific community that have been willing to openly claim the Bush administration are using Ivins as a patsy and whitewashing the truth, and yet none of them have come on board the 9/11 Truth Movement. I wonder why...
 
The truth about Anthrax is they piqued with State of Euphoria in 1988 and by the time John Bush replaced Joey Belladonna in '92 they were little more than a parody of their former selves.

Now it's dark.
rock.gif
 
lol.

The truth is...that Israel did it. there is no evidence that they did it. no proof that they did it. but they must have done it!!!

why? because they are jews..and jews are evil.

=)
 
Drudgewire said:
The truth about Anthrax is they piqued with State of Euphoria in 1988 and by the time John Bush replaced Joey Belladonna in '92 they were little more than a parody of their former selves.

Now it's dark. [qimg]http://www.lethalwrestling.com/upload/rock.gif[/qimg]
Click to expand...

If ever we meet, you've earned a stout ale, on me.

:clap:
 
parky76 said:
lol.

The truth is...that Israel did it. there is no evidence that they did it. no proof that they did it. but they must have done it!!!

why? because they are jews..and jews are evil.

=)
Click to expand...

Yes, Israel is responsible. Their motive was to get the US to invade Iraq.
 
MaGZ said:
Yes, Israel is responsible. Their motive was to get the US to invade Iraq.
Click to expand...

THe note indicates that the attacker wanted the dimwits to connect it with 9/11. I do not think that writing the date in American, rather than international notation was intended to divert from that connection. It was probably the mistake of a nerd who knew only his own professional specialty and his political doctrine well.

Mossad, had they wanted to motivate us to go to war on their behalf, would have used the proper date notation.

FAIL.
 
leftysergeant said:
THe note indicates that the attacker wanted the dimwits to connect it with 9/11. I do not think that writing the date in American, rather than international notation was intended to divert from that connection. It was probably the mistake of a nerd who knew only his own professional specialty and his political doctrine well.

Mossad, had they wanted to motivate us to go to war on their behalf, would have used the proper date notation.

FAIL.
Click to expand...

The Mossad never intended the clues they left to indicate themselves or Islamic extremists to be responsible for the attacks. The Mossad framed Dr. Hatfill. He was the designated fallguy. The frame started in April 1997 with the B'nai B'rith anthrax hoax. When this happened Hatfill was across town at a conference. So the dating of the anthrax notes were intended to apperar an American wrote the date.
 
MaGZ said:
The Mossad never intended the clues they left to indicate themselves or Islamic extremists to be responsible for the attacks.
Click to expand...

This is inconsistant with your assertion that Mossad wanted us to use it as an excuse to invade Iraq.
 
you know, MaGz seems to know sooo much about the anthrax attacks, im starting to wonder if maybe he was somehow involved.

MaGz, any response?
 
parky76 said:
you know, MaGz seems to know sooo much about the anthrax attacks, im starting to wonder if maybe he was somehow involved.

MaGz, any response?
Click to expand...

I figured when i saw the lame attempt to tie it to 9/11 that it was a white nationalist thing.
 
leftysergeant said:
This is inconsistant with your assertion that Mossad wanted us to use it as an excuse to invade Iraq.
Click to expand...


Hatfill was just the cover to keep the FBI busy and a distance from the Mossad. The anthrax attacks were intended to terrorize the citizens of the US (the media mailings) and members of the US Senate.

Daschle and Leahy were chosen because Daschle was an opponent to US involvement in the first Gulf War. Leahey was picked because of the Leahy Amendment which limits American arms to countries which violate human rights. After 9/11 the anthrax scare was used to motivate the Senate and the American people to support an invasion of Iraq because we were all told Iraq had WMDs.
 
MaGZ said:
Yes, Israel is responsible. Their motive was to get the US to invade Iraq.
Click to expand...

So why did they use an American patsy?

Surely they could have used a direct connection to Iraq.
 
Last edited:
Well, we were going to find a Canadian patsy, but they had all stepped out for a beer and it was just too complicated. Actually, it was a pasty http://www.pasty.com/ since the UP of Michigan is right next to Canada and who can tell the difference?

And if you say I am just making trouble I can only reply that next to Magz I am completely nailed down.

What is there to do with Magz's assertions but laugh? Lest anyone accuse me of trolling.

ps You can even have a Pasty Cameo http://www.pasty.com/cam/cameoindex.html

Even Magz.
 
Last edited:
Drudgewire said:
The truth about Anthrax is they piqued with State of Euphoria in 1988 and by the time John Bush replaced Joey Belladonna in '92 they were little more than a parody of their former selves.

Now it's dark.

lethalwrestling.com/upload/rock.gif[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Oh just bloody great. Now they'll latch onto your post as proof that Bush was involved. He IS a fourth cousin, twice removed... I think they wrote a song about it or I read it somewhere.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom