billydkid
Illuminator
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2002
- Messages
- 4,917
Another significant point that I haven't seen addressed - didn't the judge use taxpayer's money to purchase the display? From my point of view, I have no particular problem with religious displays in public places per se' - as long as ALL religions/irrational belief systems (Buddists, Hindi, Moonies, Satanists, Branch Davidians and so on) are all granted the same privilege (a state of affairs that would, in fact, never be allowed to happen.) What I have most problem with is the use of taxpayer's money (some of whom are likely to be Buddists, Hindi, Moonies, Satanists, Branch Davidians and so on) to support this judges public endorsement of his particular idiocy. I seriously doubt he used his own money either to commission the thing or to pay the workers to install it.