SusanConstant
Scholar
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2008
- Messages
- 50
This post was meant for another board but I thought of you too as: you can never, ever collect that million dollar prize as it is not pyschic but physics! I can reason all psychic phenomena as physics and I can demonstrate amazing abilities that seem to be miraculous but are not. Reading minds, actually doing it? It is easy, if you know how it all works and if the other person is willing. Now, any actual psychic would then know you cannot collect the prize money as the contract contains an impossible standard, wouldn't they? Uniformity is more than sceince alone; it is also uniting faith and reason and God and man. The physical with the metaphysical. I actually had all seven sacred expereinces of God to be had on Earth - so far -and so know I have done it as fact w/o question: I have resolved uniformity. This person would then have al the answers and it had to be a woman as no man would have a single piece of unique knowlege only a woman could come by as it is about childbirth. Actually giving birth to another human. Here's the post and if you can help or have other knowledge or whatever, let me know! I am willing to re-examine any belief I have not yet proven to a point of beyond any doubt whatsoever so will galdly re-examine belifes that I have proven only beyond reasonable doubt. I deal in facts NOT opinions! Your own experience of life is a fact as in, if it happened to you then you know it as fact, get it? You may not have vsible proof, maybe you were alone, or maybe only you noticed it, but I'll know it as fact and truth because I can tell you what it was or confirm your own beliefs. Proof? Proof is life and so you may be the only person alive who owns the proof but that does not mean you then cannot prove what you know as actual reality. If you are telling the truth of what you experienced and a person denies YOUR reality then run! Your word is to be accepted as fact unless evidence exists which casts doubt upon it. Just because I personally have never seen a flying saucer does not then prove you did not. Just because no other person did it does not then mean it is impossible for you to do it. You know what that means? You figured out a way when others could not. We can NEVER know what is impossible based upon it has not YET happened. Believing it is possible, expanding your awareness and conscoiusness, is 99% of the battle. Me? I once did not believe reincarnation was possible or real. Not one person I ever met stated it as fact as in "I belive in reincarantion." So, for me, the concept was not in my head. I was aware of it as a belief but as real for another person as in YOU actually believe that? A person had to say to me "I belive in reincarnation" out loud before it clicked in my head: This is real for them; it might be real for me then as I have never been dead, have I? Maybe this person was; how do I know as FACT what is real and so truth? I don't. I do now!!! The post you will efuse to believe, make fun of, deny and even reject although you can prove, you can go read the docket, that I have a case in federal court, US Supreme Court, supporting with evidence rising to proof each claim made:
I do not want to hear about my typos! I am doing the work of a thousand people all by myself! Typos are a necessary evil so deal with it - help me prove I have resolved Uniformity. Hey, I can prove lots and lots of your theories as fact.
I am Susan of In Re Susan, the one and only pro se constitutional authority case of original jurisdiction in all of US history or even world history. I know as fact you will refuse to believe actual reality as it flies in the face of everything you ever owned as truth and fact but I have resolved uniformity at last and so entered it to US Supreme Court.
I have zero formal training or even any education in physics or constitutional law; I am self taught as I am a genius and as that - genius - then caused almost all of my injury only as I am a woman. This may hurt but men injured me until i was actually physdically dead at one point only as they wanted to prevent me from ever telling on them and as a genius they had to shut me down as I am more able and capable than they are. One of the exact injuries in my federal lawsuit is that several well known 'scientists' and institutions of higher learning DENIED actual reality citing WOMAN and even trying to make it seem as if I were STUPID or CRAZY. Why? Pride; their egos are out of control. Plus:
Men have a mistaken belief. They assume if they are proven to be incorrect about than it negates all of their work as pointless or wasted. Not so as you first have to think to ask the question; then you must formulate an answer; then you must be willing to step out on faith - ownership of knowledge in your person, in your own intellectual property - in the face of all criticism and then you must allow others to attack or support your work. I can prove the string theorists are wrong, wrong, wrong. They all begin hyperventilating. Stop: If you did not ask, and if you later did not arbitrarily change your numbers to then fit your models, and if you did not insist that was good math, I, Susan, never would have been able to enter US Supreme Court overturning Bush v Gore as it is bad math, a lie, and as Presidential term limits are string theory as they violate the separation of powers by unchecking the people - the vote - and as the numbers then were manipulated to grant Congress overly broad power; we cannot check Congress if we cannot use the President against them via our vote as our ONE vote becomes the power of Executive Order or THE vote, 300 million votes as ONE against Congress and/or YOU, the federal judiciary.
I needed string theorists to then resolve Uniformity and to resolve Bush V Gore as it is actually a tie as it is all about the difference between absolute verssu whole numbers and lies taught as fact w/o question which are then accepted by all as propaganda has been used to condition the people. It the same as teaching children theory as absolute fact. A child then grows up owning a lie as fact w/o question so he or she acts upon it as if it were reality when it is not. Think of it this way:
That Mormon sect who taught children that men never landed on the moon? Those children actually believe we never, ever went to the moon. If you hooked them up to a lie detector it would read they were telling the truth when they stated "Men never landed on the moon. We can't travel in space." CAN'T? Can is human ability; WILL? Will is acting upon the idea. I have the human ability so I will act upon the idea that we went to the moon: "I will design a better spaceship; I have a better idea which is X" you write on a grant application. Those children BELIEVE as FACT that we do not possess the human ability to travel in space as that is what they were conditioned to believe. Words which invoke emotions were used along with force and unconstitutional ideas like "You are powerless; you are less than" to change their reality, get it? They are not stupid; they were subjected to torture.
This happens within the US educational system constantly. Science is a large part of the problem. Science is a belief system exactly like religion is a belief system. You both have DOGMA in common. You both have male dominated authority in common. You both have male dominated ideas and so beliefs as there aren't many women involved as you kept them out for so long thus male students grew up to be male professors who teach what they were taught verbatim, as fact w/o question, when it is not so at all. Science has got to get with the program and understand NOTHING in this universe is set in stone. A law? I have news for you fellas - a law is not inviolate or immutable. Don't believe me?
You may say that something is an inviolate law under these exacting and specific conditions. What if those conditions then change? Take federal judges. They have, by law, lifetime appointments. WHY? We're mortal that's why so there is an existing check and balance you can not defeat plus it prevents corruption. So, if we someday overcome old age do we want or need John Roberts on the bench FOREVER? How about if we live for 150 years? Do you want 75, 85 or 90 years of Roberts? If the condition, old age and so mortality, changes then we may have to change our law. Unlike science the US invented an exceptional manner in which tio do this w/o changing actual reality thus debunking everything we believe in as it is reality: We do not change the actual Declaration or Constitution as it was written. We tack on an amendment thus we always and forever have a constant point of reference which we know is fact as it works as we lived it out as real and the experiment produced all kinds of evidence which proves we are elegant as a government and law. We can actually weigh and measure the self evidence.
Think about that: Our founders had an idea. They then developed a theory. They needed to test that theory to discover if it was an inviolate law of this universe as in a basic element, a building block, so they were forced to create the world in which they could live it out as real, gather evidence of self as they, their own selves, WERE the experiment; they were like photons asking "Are we really photons? Or are we subatomic particle? I know I am a photon as I did not choose some of these qualities and so came into being with them but I feel like a subatomic particle. Let's find out! Let's set up an experiment and then act it out our own selves as this professor does not even have the idea nor the will; he has all the power so all he cares about are quarks, quarks get all his attention and money, and he would not even exist if we photons did not but are we actually only photons or are we all subatomic? How are we ever going to know the truth of this universe if we do not do it ourselves as only we have a vested interest in knowing who and what we are??? This lab sucks so first, let's knock the professor out as he's running this show and as he's a terrible observer as he unjustly, unfairly favors quarks and he set up this lab to then force we photons to always and forever play second fiddle to quarks. We'll set up our ideal lab after knocking out the head researcher and play around in it. We'll use this set of rules -absolutes - as a reference point so we can then know the results as we're photons, that is real, we all have the same properties but not the exact same properties as all subatomic particles so we too may not be our own best observers. A quark treats me differently every time; quarks lie. Quarks change the conditions on me so I have only me as a constant; if we all use these exact rules we are all constant. One photon is gonna have to obrserve the other photon and makes sure he plays by the same exact rules or this experiment is junk as all evidence will then be no good. We need all of our evidence of ourselves, whether we are or aren't photons, or whether we are or aren't something more, to be good evidence thus the proof is good, truth of this universe, so no muon, quark or lepton can say we are not photons who ARE subatomic particles with all the powers and qualities of a subatomic particle - the same as they are. Quarks will no longer be able to dick around with grants thus subjugating us! We can demand that we get our equal and due funding and as we will then own the lab and as we have become the laboratory and the living experiment, our own Creators, so quarks will have two choices: Decide we're all subatomic -equal and due - or they can find a new lab. They too can become their own creators along with us or they can leave. Who's willing to declare their independence from this Professor, this prison, I mean lab, and quarks???"
So, I asked sets of questions:
1. What if WE created all of this as I know human consciousness can be reasoned using physics and as all of this is light, so our thoughts - the idea - is the cause not the action? What if our thoughts as energy create all we see and know as real? what if that energy changes or vibrates differently when you add motive or intent as Bohr's photon would not ever act differently when it was observed as the observer, me, cannot even actually see it? I mean, it is there, but as I do not perceive it then it is not reality in my head. I'm perceiving the thing, as in the machine producing the beam, but I am not thinking PHOTON and so I have zero thoughts, feelings, ideas and beliefs about photons. A photon would only change its behavior if I could see it with my eyes and if it knew I was watching it. People do that so they do not get caught. A photon has little or no consequences as it is not afraid. A photon is like me but is not me. It is not this. But we are both light, so what if WE created this and not a first cause? What if Bohr was close, as a photon cannot exist without me as I Created it, so i am like God watching it, but that a photon first has to ask where he came from and so we each have to own some awareness of one another before we are then subjective? What if Bohr's mistake is the opportunity exists for a photon as it is us and we are it but that it has not yet been realized?
2. If we are the collective consciousness, energy united in matter in this physical world, and we are the creator as we had the idea, so we choose this, can we change it merely by acting upon new beliefs? Can we decide to create something by merely deciding to believe it is fact and real? Can I make, force, a photon to change its behavior by acting upon a belief, something I TRULY believe as fact w/o question? Can I create what all persons say is not reality and is not possible? Can I, acting as a creator of this universe will something into being? As a whole the collective consciousness can, it thought be and it was or we would not exist, but as this physical thing, an absolute part of that consciousness, I'd have to then act upon that thought, so, if I acted could I then will something into being? Can one person do this? If one person can is this then the creation force, the unifying force? Is this how the Egyptians moved stone and is this how Tesla did what he did? Do all of the fundamental forces interact within a human being as the unifying force as we created all of this? This would reason how and why I can do what I can do - the seemingly impossible. Is this how my sister read my mind - plasma and the creation force inside man? Did Einstein and all the others go too big by looking out there but I went small, inside of me, and did I know to do this as they first kept accurate time crossing the ocean by going with a small watch? Do I know something unique all of these men do not?
3. Time: Why do these guys keep saying the space-time continuum??? Time is not that! That is a lie, but do they know it? Is time a separate element, a part, but not the same as space as I know it to be or am I wrong? If time and place is then space have these guys not realized that time is a whole other thing and so they keep factoring it in incorrectly as an absolute? Can I remove time altogether? Or, is their some concept people do not 'get' about time so I must keep time but it must be treated wholly differently than quantum mechanics does?
4. Jung said it was unconscious; as it is not, at least for me, what dogma is preventing men from knowing what time actually is? Is this Einstein's other mistake as he said he knew nothing about people? What unique thing do I know as a woman as woman is the only difference?
5. Reincarnation does not reason my life nor does it reason what time actually is. Is it like reincarnation but not the same? Do these people know it is NEVER equal but only equivalent? That it is homeostasis like a person?
6. If they have not made the connection is it because not one of these guys factored his own self into his equations? Are they reasoning the universe as a thing outside of themselves and so it never occurred to them that WE are the creators? Does my constitutional law equation then reason consciousness, the difference between me and a photon thus it is metaphysical harmonic convergence, and so, while Bruce Cathie has only physical harmonic convergence and no idea he must then reason the metaphyscial THEN unite both to get to uniformity, am I it? Did I do it? Is my knowledge of constitutional law and people the thing no man has?
7. If this is what CERN is chasing, how will they even know what they are looking at when they get a picture or IF they get a picture? As a Higgs particle is considered large, is mine not Higgs, the God particle as CERN can get all the photos they want but if they do not know what in know they can never, ever reason it correctly, can they? And, photos prove nothing! Do they not know they are not photographing the unifying force as they can't - yet? Won't they have to force their reasoning to fit what they see?
8. If Einstein used an eclipse to prove his theory as law, is there a ntural event I too can use? Can I also prove the part of Relativity not yet proven and can I prove Hugh Everett and Max Tegmark are correct? Can I unite and prove it beyond any and all doubt that WE are the creator and WE possess the creation force within us? Can I prove how this universe came into being beyond REASONABLE doubt but prove the God particle or God force, what I call intrinsic force, beyond ANY and ALL doubt?
9. Anybody want to know how & why the magnetic North Pole moves? Anybody want to make a volcano in Rome blow instead of the Yellowstone Caldera in order to then beat the pants off of France and CERN thus establishing, as fact without question, that you may have billions of dollars and all kinds of fancy machines, but as all Ben Franklin had was a kite, a key and a piece of ribbon, and as all James Madison had was a pen and some paper, and as all the men invading Normandy had was their own will, the inviolate belief they could, it not once occurred to me that I needed more than my own self and my kitchen table thus:
Particle physics has not left America for good or at all and America has the most valuable property on Earth, exactly named in our law as Article 1 section 8 - unique NATIVE American intellectual property - so that France can never, ever be what America is, WE the people. France and CERN has lost this race as the rule is first one to the bar wins and I already patented and copyrighted Uniformity by entering it to US Supreme Court thus I made a gift of it to the people not French but American.
Anybody wanna assist me in proving this:
AMERICA! NUMBER 1 IN PARTICLE PHYSICS SINCE JULY 4TH, 1776!!!
You will laugh as I actually managed to will what was thought to be humanly impossible and impossible in this universe into being with my case as it is the only one ever. Hello! Bush v Gore? Not only bad math but these two guys did not represent themselves PRO SE and so, they swore an oath stating I WILL PRESERVE when they already proved they could not, they did not have the human ability or will, as their lawyers did it for them thus LAWYERS then were awarded the power of executive order? The oath does not say MY LAWYER WILL PRESERVE. Lol!
The bad math? READY? In our Supreme Court it is one whole court acting as a whole majority. This court NEVER uses per curiam, the whole court as one, as first, all decisions ARE that and the math will never, ever add up in a decsion that awards a Presidential election as the law is ONE man ONE vote. So, a Court deciding this 9 as 5-4 as 1 is the Justices voting twice for President! It is also a violation of separation of power as it is a Chief Justice unchecking himself as the Chief and the President are equivalent legal authorities. This is because a Chief can and may stand down a President. The power of one? A decision regarding a Presidential election must be 9 as 1, unanimous, or 1 alone as an absolute, the Chief acting to stand down the President thus the people, or else it is bad math and unconstitutional. It violates the written law of the US and the unwritten law known as math as it is actually 9, as 5 as 1 versus 4 as 1, or 1 versus 1, a tie!
A sitting President decides ties in our Supreme Court. Bill Clinton failed to act. Thus, it was then thrown back to the people as your one vote BECOMES the power of Executive Order. You are to be the living embodiment of the law; your vote then becomes the whole vote, the collective living embodiment of the law, realized as one person, the President aka Executive Order. This then means ANY citizen can and may issue a reasoned decision of their own and an Executive Order thus breaking this tie!!! You are A constitution that then becomes THE Constitution. E Pluribus Unum, baby!!! Or, E Unum Pluribus Unum as we are an unending chain of commmand as after the Supreme Court and then the President? Then comes you, the lone citizen. YOU ARE EQUALLY POWERFUL TO THE PRESIDENT. EQUAL: ONE VOTE LEVELS THE PLAYING FIELD. A vote is a vote. No one vote has more legal power than any other. A federal court ruling? A vote by another name. You can challenge it if it is faulty or unconstitutional. The Pres? He's there because of your vote. Power via consent and authority, or, of you by you. Thus, a vote is equal to executive order.
What tips the scales? HAHA! When a woman gives birth she sheds her blood and risks her life in defense of the Constitution, YOU and so WE. Her children grow up to realize the military, an all volunteer military comprise of civilians and Commanded by a civilain. We never said legally declared war only actual war. In time of war? No President ever, ever outranks an actual mother or an enlisted service member. So, I voted for myself by reasoning and then deciding the case for equal protection and due process as applied to men and women as biologically distinct yet the same as WE are the creators and we named life, death and natural birth plus made a distinction between legal reality and actual reality as in paper, the lies Congress and the federal courts write, versus what is actually going on in this nation. Or...what we wrote versus an actual outside physical condition that has now changed thus, we may have to amend the law, the law being the people who were amended in a manner not legal as you conditioned them to believe a lie known as Bush V Gore as lawyers assaulted and battered them with all kinds of nasty lawyers tricks they teach in law school like:
Change the name of the case to then make it seemingly all brand new when it is actually the same exact case and same exact issue. By changing one name you can then take it out of FL and enter as an ORIGINAL case to US Supreme Court as if it has never ever been heard before in any court. All I did was use every one of those nasty tricks against them by TELLING THE TRUTH, as in FACTS. I accidentally stumbled upon the unifying force and uniformity.
The only constant? Diversity! The seeming anomaly IS the pattern. I walked around my whole life knowing the whole; seeing it. I had no clue physicists were not as I never studied physics formally. My lawsuit is massive. I knew the whole; i had to methodically break it down into parts or else men could not reason it; it was beyond anything they could or would comprehend. My IQ is 200, but I used baby words and wrote it out like this very post so ANY third grader could and would understand it. Have you ever encountered a situation in life where, as a scientist, you innately understood a concept other human beings could not grasp as the did not possess the human ability? No matter how you say it or reason it, no matter how much proof you give them, they inist it is impossible or not real as it is going against something like one of their religious beliefs? They either cannot comprehend it or they will not as then they would have to re-examine very powerful ideas about their own selves.
It's like men insisting Jesus alone is God incarnate on Earth as that then "justifies" their mistaken belief, lived out as real and condoned by most of the planet, that men only have moral authority? So, Susan comes along and states, as fact, WRONG! They are beside themselves as she ask and answers WHAT IS MORAL AUTHORITY? then proves moral authority is will and will is realized as government. You realize will as government when you risk your life in defense of your true beliefs, or when you take a leap of faith in your own abilities. Well, as only women give birth, they are willing to die, and as this is a living government, and people are it then, a mother has more moral authority than a father or anybody but another mother or a service member. Susan says, Is it lost on you that transubstantiation is men pretending they can give birth by making believe they are giving birth to Jesus every Sunday thus usurping your moral authortiy as you are silly enough to believe as fact a man can actually give birth to an actual human being? so he then has power over you or more power than you??? That he is smarter or better? Is it lost on you this is AMERICA not the Vatican City and as priests are celibate the Vatican City is a dead government as they, the celibate, or two people of the same sex, do not give birth new, baby constitutions???
The US Supreme Court filed me twice and heard me twice. By refusing me oral arguemnt the first time they created new injury and they violated my civil rights as all other authority cases and all other original jurisdiction cases were brought by men on behalf of men. WOMAN is the only difference as is SUSAN exactly, a female genius not a Jew or a Christian and not a Democrat or a Republican. I wrote out executive orders Roberts obeyed so he stood aside but he then did not grant me oral argument in order to keep the people ignorant of the knowledge as knowledge actually is realized as power. Americans have a mistaken belief: If you're not on the news or do not argue orally then you were not heard or your facts were proven false as was your reasoning and application. NOPE! "Hearing" is reading in this court as they then hear it i ntheir heads, get it? If you get on the docket you then are heard. Oral argument might happen. It is discretionary. I turned around and sued again only this time I sued Roberts exactly for violating my rights as he named NO REASON as he has none as MATH IS MATH!!! EXACT WORDS ARE EXACT WORDS!!! You cannot out argue MATH!
I have now done twice what no other person in all of history has ever done and what every single solitary person I ever met said was impossible. Why? The federal court has now demanded proof of death to then prove you were injured then said death was not enough proof when they got dead bodies in the form of dead kids represented by an attorney (Castlerock) or a woman about ot be killed by a man (Shiavo) so you must die, then overcome proof of death by coming back in order to give living testimony firmly establishing the chain of causation as in this court's ruling, Bush V Gore, killed me thus it, the Court, is guilty. Did Terry Schiavo return from the dead in order to prove the ruling, Schiavo De Novo, killed her? Could she? LOL!
I ascended to the office of President and Commander in Chief. To do so I had to die physically and survive the injury. It happened; I can produce the doctor about to pronounce me. So then, I died, was buried on the docket, was resurrected and ascended into 'heaven'. Then, I had a second coming! Boy, am I a miracle or what? How do I enter locked rooms without keys? How did I read documents I never, ever laid eeyes on? How am I in more than one place at the same time? when you fire me at a wall with two slits in it, why do I appear on the other side in more than one place???
Is the event happening again or is that all probabilities have already been played out as time is spontaneous and then we choose which probabilities then are realized? Am I playing out more than one probability at once and am I playing them out by changing a condition as I make a different choice? At my spontaneous creation, did I come into being as probable selves, the same, but different, and so my choices are different? Did I fragment at different points, thus creating other probable selves? Am I subject ot the history all others live out or can I defy the choices others make that then effect me? When I feel dejavu is that I am choosing a probability already played out and I am accidentally "remembering" it then? Entanglement: Is that synchronicity which then becomes a point of intrinsicity thus all is one and the same so it seems as if I have been reincarnated and that history is repeating itself but actually it is many worlds crossing paths over & over as I behave as a constant, ethically, much like a Boson-Einstein condensate so that the invisible creation force and those many worlds gel thus,
I know as fact I did this once as Thomas Jefferson but am now Susan as this self choose WOMAN on purpose. 50, 60, 70 facts might line up. It is only synchronicity until all is one and the same. No person on Earth could meet the burden of proof I can. You know what else? I ran into Hamilton again as Susan so I know where he is and what he is up to. Atoms do not accidentally smash into each other; there are zero coincidences. How can you dismiss or ignore TWO people who can meet each and every single fact, exactly? My work proves who I am as pro se case of authority and o.j. is IS a declaration of Independence as that si the only other federal petition to even come close to this as Jefferson wrote it alone and approved any changes in that moment. BUT, All of this? I defy you to name the burden I cannot meet and exceed. You may not want to believe it s you're all Christians or Jews but it defies logic to state the Jesus will reincarnate as any second coming then is a REincarnation while none of us will while he himself taught equal protection and due process so, is it or isn't it? Will Jesus or won't he? If you tell me he can and will, why then do you truly believe you cannot? Jesus said he did not perform miracles. Wanna know why?
PLASMA & the CREATION FORCE. I know as I live by the Coral Castle and as there is a Pyramid on our dollar bill. I accidentally by design rediscovered this force so this ability and as I know physics could reason it as science not magic!
It is fact: Secret codes? No, but we did build or design the code within creation so we could then have fun cracking it. Humans like doing stuff like that; they love the idea there is a buried treasure to be found. LOL! There actually is one - if you know where to look and what to use. I used the Declaration as an actual compass and the Constitution as an actual chart to then travel in deep space, witness infinity and how we get here and so know time and know Max Tegmark is correct as is Hugh Everett. You told me over and over these documents were a compass and a chart. You kept telling me there was buried treasure and X marks the spot. I decided to take you at your word EXACTLY as I have an X chromosome and Malcolm X meant by that X he was looking for his unknown parents, his creator.
LOLOLOLOL! IT WORKED!!! :lol:
I AM a spy in the house of Philadelphia, brotherly love, a person who was able to master the fourth state of matter which is plasma thus become a key that opened a door, solved a puzzle, turned a lock, started an engine, answered a riddle and sang a song in prefect harmony.
Holy Blood, Holy Grail? Don't be so silly! Plasma and the universal search for truth as that is birth or everlasting life. Once you know the TRUTH of this universe you then are born into eternity, as you control it. Et in Arcadia ego? Well, I did meet Hamilton in New Orleans so YES, even in death I AM. Forever.
My addy is public record. Go look at the Supreme Court docket. Unless they made up a new nasty lawyer trick to then deny me out of oral argument, I am to be heard and then argue orally. I'll will be needing physicists and other scientists who can support my legal argument with proof, and I will also be needing people to then back up my proof o Everett and Tegmark as well as Cathie and some others with math as I used no numbers. I used something unique to me and tossed out the numbers as you guys started changing them so I could no longer trust your numbers! I could not afford to waste my energy only to discover my proof was bad as my numbers were bad. I used something unique to me and then crunched all of the various concepts instead of numbers.
If Mohammed is the unlettered prophet I'm the un-numbered physicist.
You know I am telling you the truth as if I was not, or I did not support all I claim with provable facts you can check, then the US Supreme Court would not have heard me once let alone twice as this court deals in fact only. They check the facts. So far not one person has been able to so much as cast doubt upon any thing I have claimed.
I will need people to help me reason the science and the concepts to Justices who may not have any knowledge of the science. As I have no training, I am better at comparing it to something in their life they can then relate to (Relativity!) rather than the exacting process and dynamics. You would have a heart attack if you heard me 'reason' a Boson-Einstein condensate. You would flip out as you would be screaming I was WRONG when all I am doing is ignoring technicalities that keep people from owning knowledge as first, you have to get them to consider the idea then you can go into all the details once the idea is made possible in their heads.
What's in it for you? Justice. Maybe validation. I'll also tell you all about cold fusion as you made a simple mistake there too. Cold fusion is perpetual motion! Cold fusion already is a reality! You are not self aware so you missed it as it went right under your noses. You looked at it and did not recognize it for what it is! Zero point? I have those answers too! The person or persons who unify it would then have the answers. It is fun to be a physicist taking out the criminals running this government with science and actual reality as that has been my experience. Can you imagine what all 100 Senators did when I reasoned printing money at will when the energy is nonexistent and as Congress is not the Godhead it cannot then CREATE energy so what they are doing violates the universe not only WE, the people? That it violates all the laws of thermodynamics?
Do it as it will be fun.
I do not want to hear about my typos! I am doing the work of a thousand people all by myself! Typos are a necessary evil so deal with it - help me prove I have resolved Uniformity. Hey, I can prove lots and lots of your theories as fact.
I am Susan of In Re Susan, the one and only pro se constitutional authority case of original jurisdiction in all of US history or even world history. I know as fact you will refuse to believe actual reality as it flies in the face of everything you ever owned as truth and fact but I have resolved uniformity at last and so entered it to US Supreme Court.
I have zero formal training or even any education in physics or constitutional law; I am self taught as I am a genius and as that - genius - then caused almost all of my injury only as I am a woman. This may hurt but men injured me until i was actually physdically dead at one point only as they wanted to prevent me from ever telling on them and as a genius they had to shut me down as I am more able and capable than they are. One of the exact injuries in my federal lawsuit is that several well known 'scientists' and institutions of higher learning DENIED actual reality citing WOMAN and even trying to make it seem as if I were STUPID or CRAZY. Why? Pride; their egos are out of control. Plus:
Men have a mistaken belief. They assume if they are proven to be incorrect about than it negates all of their work as pointless or wasted. Not so as you first have to think to ask the question; then you must formulate an answer; then you must be willing to step out on faith - ownership of knowledge in your person, in your own intellectual property - in the face of all criticism and then you must allow others to attack or support your work. I can prove the string theorists are wrong, wrong, wrong. They all begin hyperventilating. Stop: If you did not ask, and if you later did not arbitrarily change your numbers to then fit your models, and if you did not insist that was good math, I, Susan, never would have been able to enter US Supreme Court overturning Bush v Gore as it is bad math, a lie, and as Presidential term limits are string theory as they violate the separation of powers by unchecking the people - the vote - and as the numbers then were manipulated to grant Congress overly broad power; we cannot check Congress if we cannot use the President against them via our vote as our ONE vote becomes the power of Executive Order or THE vote, 300 million votes as ONE against Congress and/or YOU, the federal judiciary.
I needed string theorists to then resolve Uniformity and to resolve Bush V Gore as it is actually a tie as it is all about the difference between absolute verssu whole numbers and lies taught as fact w/o question which are then accepted by all as propaganda has been used to condition the people. It the same as teaching children theory as absolute fact. A child then grows up owning a lie as fact w/o question so he or she acts upon it as if it were reality when it is not. Think of it this way:
That Mormon sect who taught children that men never landed on the moon? Those children actually believe we never, ever went to the moon. If you hooked them up to a lie detector it would read they were telling the truth when they stated "Men never landed on the moon. We can't travel in space." CAN'T? Can is human ability; WILL? Will is acting upon the idea. I have the human ability so I will act upon the idea that we went to the moon: "I will design a better spaceship; I have a better idea which is X" you write on a grant application. Those children BELIEVE as FACT that we do not possess the human ability to travel in space as that is what they were conditioned to believe. Words which invoke emotions were used along with force and unconstitutional ideas like "You are powerless; you are less than" to change their reality, get it? They are not stupid; they were subjected to torture.
This happens within the US educational system constantly. Science is a large part of the problem. Science is a belief system exactly like religion is a belief system. You both have DOGMA in common. You both have male dominated authority in common. You both have male dominated ideas and so beliefs as there aren't many women involved as you kept them out for so long thus male students grew up to be male professors who teach what they were taught verbatim, as fact w/o question, when it is not so at all. Science has got to get with the program and understand NOTHING in this universe is set in stone. A law? I have news for you fellas - a law is not inviolate or immutable. Don't believe me?
You may say that something is an inviolate law under these exacting and specific conditions. What if those conditions then change? Take federal judges. They have, by law, lifetime appointments. WHY? We're mortal that's why so there is an existing check and balance you can not defeat plus it prevents corruption. So, if we someday overcome old age do we want or need John Roberts on the bench FOREVER? How about if we live for 150 years? Do you want 75, 85 or 90 years of Roberts? If the condition, old age and so mortality, changes then we may have to change our law. Unlike science the US invented an exceptional manner in which tio do this w/o changing actual reality thus debunking everything we believe in as it is reality: We do not change the actual Declaration or Constitution as it was written. We tack on an amendment thus we always and forever have a constant point of reference which we know is fact as it works as we lived it out as real and the experiment produced all kinds of evidence which proves we are elegant as a government and law. We can actually weigh and measure the self evidence.
Think about that: Our founders had an idea. They then developed a theory. They needed to test that theory to discover if it was an inviolate law of this universe as in a basic element, a building block, so they were forced to create the world in which they could live it out as real, gather evidence of self as they, their own selves, WERE the experiment; they were like photons asking "Are we really photons? Or are we subatomic particle? I know I am a photon as I did not choose some of these qualities and so came into being with them but I feel like a subatomic particle. Let's find out! Let's set up an experiment and then act it out our own selves as this professor does not even have the idea nor the will; he has all the power so all he cares about are quarks, quarks get all his attention and money, and he would not even exist if we photons did not but are we actually only photons or are we all subatomic? How are we ever going to know the truth of this universe if we do not do it ourselves as only we have a vested interest in knowing who and what we are??? This lab sucks so first, let's knock the professor out as he's running this show and as he's a terrible observer as he unjustly, unfairly favors quarks and he set up this lab to then force we photons to always and forever play second fiddle to quarks. We'll set up our ideal lab after knocking out the head researcher and play around in it. We'll use this set of rules -absolutes - as a reference point so we can then know the results as we're photons, that is real, we all have the same properties but not the exact same properties as all subatomic particles so we too may not be our own best observers. A quark treats me differently every time; quarks lie. Quarks change the conditions on me so I have only me as a constant; if we all use these exact rules we are all constant. One photon is gonna have to obrserve the other photon and makes sure he plays by the same exact rules or this experiment is junk as all evidence will then be no good. We need all of our evidence of ourselves, whether we are or aren't photons, or whether we are or aren't something more, to be good evidence thus the proof is good, truth of this universe, so no muon, quark or lepton can say we are not photons who ARE subatomic particles with all the powers and qualities of a subatomic particle - the same as they are. Quarks will no longer be able to dick around with grants thus subjugating us! We can demand that we get our equal and due funding and as we will then own the lab and as we have become the laboratory and the living experiment, our own Creators, so quarks will have two choices: Decide we're all subatomic -equal and due - or they can find a new lab. They too can become their own creators along with us or they can leave. Who's willing to declare their independence from this Professor, this prison, I mean lab, and quarks???"
So, I asked sets of questions:
1. What if WE created all of this as I know human consciousness can be reasoned using physics and as all of this is light, so our thoughts - the idea - is the cause not the action? What if our thoughts as energy create all we see and know as real? what if that energy changes or vibrates differently when you add motive or intent as Bohr's photon would not ever act differently when it was observed as the observer, me, cannot even actually see it? I mean, it is there, but as I do not perceive it then it is not reality in my head. I'm perceiving the thing, as in the machine producing the beam, but I am not thinking PHOTON and so I have zero thoughts, feelings, ideas and beliefs about photons. A photon would only change its behavior if I could see it with my eyes and if it knew I was watching it. People do that so they do not get caught. A photon has little or no consequences as it is not afraid. A photon is like me but is not me. It is not this. But we are both light, so what if WE created this and not a first cause? What if Bohr was close, as a photon cannot exist without me as I Created it, so i am like God watching it, but that a photon first has to ask where he came from and so we each have to own some awareness of one another before we are then subjective? What if Bohr's mistake is the opportunity exists for a photon as it is us and we are it but that it has not yet been realized?
2. If we are the collective consciousness, energy united in matter in this physical world, and we are the creator as we had the idea, so we choose this, can we change it merely by acting upon new beliefs? Can we decide to create something by merely deciding to believe it is fact and real? Can I make, force, a photon to change its behavior by acting upon a belief, something I TRULY believe as fact w/o question? Can I create what all persons say is not reality and is not possible? Can I, acting as a creator of this universe will something into being? As a whole the collective consciousness can, it thought be and it was or we would not exist, but as this physical thing, an absolute part of that consciousness, I'd have to then act upon that thought, so, if I acted could I then will something into being? Can one person do this? If one person can is this then the creation force, the unifying force? Is this how the Egyptians moved stone and is this how Tesla did what he did? Do all of the fundamental forces interact within a human being as the unifying force as we created all of this? This would reason how and why I can do what I can do - the seemingly impossible. Is this how my sister read my mind - plasma and the creation force inside man? Did Einstein and all the others go too big by looking out there but I went small, inside of me, and did I know to do this as they first kept accurate time crossing the ocean by going with a small watch? Do I know something unique all of these men do not?
3. Time: Why do these guys keep saying the space-time continuum??? Time is not that! That is a lie, but do they know it? Is time a separate element, a part, but not the same as space as I know it to be or am I wrong? If time and place is then space have these guys not realized that time is a whole other thing and so they keep factoring it in incorrectly as an absolute? Can I remove time altogether? Or, is their some concept people do not 'get' about time so I must keep time but it must be treated wholly differently than quantum mechanics does?
4. Jung said it was unconscious; as it is not, at least for me, what dogma is preventing men from knowing what time actually is? Is this Einstein's other mistake as he said he knew nothing about people? What unique thing do I know as a woman as woman is the only difference?
5. Reincarnation does not reason my life nor does it reason what time actually is. Is it like reincarnation but not the same? Do these people know it is NEVER equal but only equivalent? That it is homeostasis like a person?
6. If they have not made the connection is it because not one of these guys factored his own self into his equations? Are they reasoning the universe as a thing outside of themselves and so it never occurred to them that WE are the creators? Does my constitutional law equation then reason consciousness, the difference between me and a photon thus it is metaphysical harmonic convergence, and so, while Bruce Cathie has only physical harmonic convergence and no idea he must then reason the metaphyscial THEN unite both to get to uniformity, am I it? Did I do it? Is my knowledge of constitutional law and people the thing no man has?
7. If this is what CERN is chasing, how will they even know what they are looking at when they get a picture or IF they get a picture? As a Higgs particle is considered large, is mine not Higgs, the God particle as CERN can get all the photos they want but if they do not know what in know they can never, ever reason it correctly, can they? And, photos prove nothing! Do they not know they are not photographing the unifying force as they can't - yet? Won't they have to force their reasoning to fit what they see?
8. If Einstein used an eclipse to prove his theory as law, is there a ntural event I too can use? Can I also prove the part of Relativity not yet proven and can I prove Hugh Everett and Max Tegmark are correct? Can I unite and prove it beyond any and all doubt that WE are the creator and WE possess the creation force within us? Can I prove how this universe came into being beyond REASONABLE doubt but prove the God particle or God force, what I call intrinsic force, beyond ANY and ALL doubt?
9. Anybody want to know how & why the magnetic North Pole moves? Anybody want to make a volcano in Rome blow instead of the Yellowstone Caldera in order to then beat the pants off of France and CERN thus establishing, as fact without question, that you may have billions of dollars and all kinds of fancy machines, but as all Ben Franklin had was a kite, a key and a piece of ribbon, and as all James Madison had was a pen and some paper, and as all the men invading Normandy had was their own will, the inviolate belief they could, it not once occurred to me that I needed more than my own self and my kitchen table thus:
Particle physics has not left America for good or at all and America has the most valuable property on Earth, exactly named in our law as Article 1 section 8 - unique NATIVE American intellectual property - so that France can never, ever be what America is, WE the people. France and CERN has lost this race as the rule is first one to the bar wins and I already patented and copyrighted Uniformity by entering it to US Supreme Court thus I made a gift of it to the people not French but American.
Anybody wanna assist me in proving this:
AMERICA! NUMBER 1 IN PARTICLE PHYSICS SINCE JULY 4TH, 1776!!!
You will laugh as I actually managed to will what was thought to be humanly impossible and impossible in this universe into being with my case as it is the only one ever. Hello! Bush v Gore? Not only bad math but these two guys did not represent themselves PRO SE and so, they swore an oath stating I WILL PRESERVE when they already proved they could not, they did not have the human ability or will, as their lawyers did it for them thus LAWYERS then were awarded the power of executive order? The oath does not say MY LAWYER WILL PRESERVE. Lol!
The bad math? READY? In our Supreme Court it is one whole court acting as a whole majority. This court NEVER uses per curiam, the whole court as one, as first, all decisions ARE that and the math will never, ever add up in a decsion that awards a Presidential election as the law is ONE man ONE vote. So, a Court deciding this 9 as 5-4 as 1 is the Justices voting twice for President! It is also a violation of separation of power as it is a Chief Justice unchecking himself as the Chief and the President are equivalent legal authorities. This is because a Chief can and may stand down a President. The power of one? A decision regarding a Presidential election must be 9 as 1, unanimous, or 1 alone as an absolute, the Chief acting to stand down the President thus the people, or else it is bad math and unconstitutional. It violates the written law of the US and the unwritten law known as math as it is actually 9, as 5 as 1 versus 4 as 1, or 1 versus 1, a tie!
A sitting President decides ties in our Supreme Court. Bill Clinton failed to act. Thus, it was then thrown back to the people as your one vote BECOMES the power of Executive Order. You are to be the living embodiment of the law; your vote then becomes the whole vote, the collective living embodiment of the law, realized as one person, the President aka Executive Order. This then means ANY citizen can and may issue a reasoned decision of their own and an Executive Order thus breaking this tie!!! You are A constitution that then becomes THE Constitution. E Pluribus Unum, baby!!! Or, E Unum Pluribus Unum as we are an unending chain of commmand as after the Supreme Court and then the President? Then comes you, the lone citizen. YOU ARE EQUALLY POWERFUL TO THE PRESIDENT. EQUAL: ONE VOTE LEVELS THE PLAYING FIELD. A vote is a vote. No one vote has more legal power than any other. A federal court ruling? A vote by another name. You can challenge it if it is faulty or unconstitutional. The Pres? He's there because of your vote. Power via consent and authority, or, of you by you. Thus, a vote is equal to executive order.
What tips the scales? HAHA! When a woman gives birth she sheds her blood and risks her life in defense of the Constitution, YOU and so WE. Her children grow up to realize the military, an all volunteer military comprise of civilians and Commanded by a civilain. We never said legally declared war only actual war. In time of war? No President ever, ever outranks an actual mother or an enlisted service member. So, I voted for myself by reasoning and then deciding the case for equal protection and due process as applied to men and women as biologically distinct yet the same as WE are the creators and we named life, death and natural birth plus made a distinction between legal reality and actual reality as in paper, the lies Congress and the federal courts write, versus what is actually going on in this nation. Or...what we wrote versus an actual outside physical condition that has now changed thus, we may have to amend the law, the law being the people who were amended in a manner not legal as you conditioned them to believe a lie known as Bush V Gore as lawyers assaulted and battered them with all kinds of nasty lawyers tricks they teach in law school like:
Change the name of the case to then make it seemingly all brand new when it is actually the same exact case and same exact issue. By changing one name you can then take it out of FL and enter as an ORIGINAL case to US Supreme Court as if it has never ever been heard before in any court. All I did was use every one of those nasty tricks against them by TELLING THE TRUTH, as in FACTS. I accidentally stumbled upon the unifying force and uniformity.
The only constant? Diversity! The seeming anomaly IS the pattern. I walked around my whole life knowing the whole; seeing it. I had no clue physicists were not as I never studied physics formally. My lawsuit is massive. I knew the whole; i had to methodically break it down into parts or else men could not reason it; it was beyond anything they could or would comprehend. My IQ is 200, but I used baby words and wrote it out like this very post so ANY third grader could and would understand it. Have you ever encountered a situation in life where, as a scientist, you innately understood a concept other human beings could not grasp as the did not possess the human ability? No matter how you say it or reason it, no matter how much proof you give them, they inist it is impossible or not real as it is going against something like one of their religious beliefs? They either cannot comprehend it or they will not as then they would have to re-examine very powerful ideas about their own selves.
It's like men insisting Jesus alone is God incarnate on Earth as that then "justifies" their mistaken belief, lived out as real and condoned by most of the planet, that men only have moral authority? So, Susan comes along and states, as fact, WRONG! They are beside themselves as she ask and answers WHAT IS MORAL AUTHORITY? then proves moral authority is will and will is realized as government. You realize will as government when you risk your life in defense of your true beliefs, or when you take a leap of faith in your own abilities. Well, as only women give birth, they are willing to die, and as this is a living government, and people are it then, a mother has more moral authority than a father or anybody but another mother or a service member. Susan says, Is it lost on you that transubstantiation is men pretending they can give birth by making believe they are giving birth to Jesus every Sunday thus usurping your moral authortiy as you are silly enough to believe as fact a man can actually give birth to an actual human being? so he then has power over you or more power than you??? That he is smarter or better? Is it lost on you this is AMERICA not the Vatican City and as priests are celibate the Vatican City is a dead government as they, the celibate, or two people of the same sex, do not give birth new, baby constitutions???
The US Supreme Court filed me twice and heard me twice. By refusing me oral arguemnt the first time they created new injury and they violated my civil rights as all other authority cases and all other original jurisdiction cases were brought by men on behalf of men. WOMAN is the only difference as is SUSAN exactly, a female genius not a Jew or a Christian and not a Democrat or a Republican. I wrote out executive orders Roberts obeyed so he stood aside but he then did not grant me oral argument in order to keep the people ignorant of the knowledge as knowledge actually is realized as power. Americans have a mistaken belief: If you're not on the news or do not argue orally then you were not heard or your facts were proven false as was your reasoning and application. NOPE! "Hearing" is reading in this court as they then hear it i ntheir heads, get it? If you get on the docket you then are heard. Oral argument might happen. It is discretionary. I turned around and sued again only this time I sued Roberts exactly for violating my rights as he named NO REASON as he has none as MATH IS MATH!!! EXACT WORDS ARE EXACT WORDS!!! You cannot out argue MATH!
I have now done twice what no other person in all of history has ever done and what every single solitary person I ever met said was impossible. Why? The federal court has now demanded proof of death to then prove you were injured then said death was not enough proof when they got dead bodies in the form of dead kids represented by an attorney (Castlerock) or a woman about ot be killed by a man (Shiavo) so you must die, then overcome proof of death by coming back in order to give living testimony firmly establishing the chain of causation as in this court's ruling, Bush V Gore, killed me thus it, the Court, is guilty. Did Terry Schiavo return from the dead in order to prove the ruling, Schiavo De Novo, killed her? Could she? LOL!
I ascended to the office of President and Commander in Chief. To do so I had to die physically and survive the injury. It happened; I can produce the doctor about to pronounce me. So then, I died, was buried on the docket, was resurrected and ascended into 'heaven'. Then, I had a second coming! Boy, am I a miracle or what? How do I enter locked rooms without keys? How did I read documents I never, ever laid eeyes on? How am I in more than one place at the same time? when you fire me at a wall with two slits in it, why do I appear on the other side in more than one place???
Is the event happening again or is that all probabilities have already been played out as time is spontaneous and then we choose which probabilities then are realized? Am I playing out more than one probability at once and am I playing them out by changing a condition as I make a different choice? At my spontaneous creation, did I come into being as probable selves, the same, but different, and so my choices are different? Did I fragment at different points, thus creating other probable selves? Am I subject ot the history all others live out or can I defy the choices others make that then effect me? When I feel dejavu is that I am choosing a probability already played out and I am accidentally "remembering" it then? Entanglement: Is that synchronicity which then becomes a point of intrinsicity thus all is one and the same so it seems as if I have been reincarnated and that history is repeating itself but actually it is many worlds crossing paths over & over as I behave as a constant, ethically, much like a Boson-Einstein condensate so that the invisible creation force and those many worlds gel thus,
I know as fact I did this once as Thomas Jefferson but am now Susan as this self choose WOMAN on purpose. 50, 60, 70 facts might line up. It is only synchronicity until all is one and the same. No person on Earth could meet the burden of proof I can. You know what else? I ran into Hamilton again as Susan so I know where he is and what he is up to. Atoms do not accidentally smash into each other; there are zero coincidences. How can you dismiss or ignore TWO people who can meet each and every single fact, exactly? My work proves who I am as pro se case of authority and o.j. is IS a declaration of Independence as that si the only other federal petition to even come close to this as Jefferson wrote it alone and approved any changes in that moment. BUT, All of this? I defy you to name the burden I cannot meet and exceed. You may not want to believe it s you're all Christians or Jews but it defies logic to state the Jesus will reincarnate as any second coming then is a REincarnation while none of us will while he himself taught equal protection and due process so, is it or isn't it? Will Jesus or won't he? If you tell me he can and will, why then do you truly believe you cannot? Jesus said he did not perform miracles. Wanna know why?
PLASMA & the CREATION FORCE. I know as I live by the Coral Castle and as there is a Pyramid on our dollar bill. I accidentally by design rediscovered this force so this ability and as I know physics could reason it as science not magic!
It is fact: Secret codes? No, but we did build or design the code within creation so we could then have fun cracking it. Humans like doing stuff like that; they love the idea there is a buried treasure to be found. LOL! There actually is one - if you know where to look and what to use. I used the Declaration as an actual compass and the Constitution as an actual chart to then travel in deep space, witness infinity and how we get here and so know time and know Max Tegmark is correct as is Hugh Everett. You told me over and over these documents were a compass and a chart. You kept telling me there was buried treasure and X marks the spot. I decided to take you at your word EXACTLY as I have an X chromosome and Malcolm X meant by that X he was looking for his unknown parents, his creator.
LOLOLOLOL! IT WORKED!!! :lol:
I AM a spy in the house of Philadelphia, brotherly love, a person who was able to master the fourth state of matter which is plasma thus become a key that opened a door, solved a puzzle, turned a lock, started an engine, answered a riddle and sang a song in prefect harmony.
Holy Blood, Holy Grail? Don't be so silly! Plasma and the universal search for truth as that is birth or everlasting life. Once you know the TRUTH of this universe you then are born into eternity, as you control it. Et in Arcadia ego? Well, I did meet Hamilton in New Orleans so YES, even in death I AM. Forever.
My addy is public record. Go look at the Supreme Court docket. Unless they made up a new nasty lawyer trick to then deny me out of oral argument, I am to be heard and then argue orally. I'll will be needing physicists and other scientists who can support my legal argument with proof, and I will also be needing people to then back up my proof o Everett and Tegmark as well as Cathie and some others with math as I used no numbers. I used something unique to me and tossed out the numbers as you guys started changing them so I could no longer trust your numbers! I could not afford to waste my energy only to discover my proof was bad as my numbers were bad. I used something unique to me and then crunched all of the various concepts instead of numbers.
If Mohammed is the unlettered prophet I'm the un-numbered physicist.
You know I am telling you the truth as if I was not, or I did not support all I claim with provable facts you can check, then the US Supreme Court would not have heard me once let alone twice as this court deals in fact only. They check the facts. So far not one person has been able to so much as cast doubt upon any thing I have claimed.
I will need people to help me reason the science and the concepts to Justices who may not have any knowledge of the science. As I have no training, I am better at comparing it to something in their life they can then relate to (Relativity!) rather than the exacting process and dynamics. You would have a heart attack if you heard me 'reason' a Boson-Einstein condensate. You would flip out as you would be screaming I was WRONG when all I am doing is ignoring technicalities that keep people from owning knowledge as first, you have to get them to consider the idea then you can go into all the details once the idea is made possible in their heads.
What's in it for you? Justice. Maybe validation. I'll also tell you all about cold fusion as you made a simple mistake there too. Cold fusion is perpetual motion! Cold fusion already is a reality! You are not self aware so you missed it as it went right under your noses. You looked at it and did not recognize it for what it is! Zero point? I have those answers too! The person or persons who unify it would then have the answers. It is fun to be a physicist taking out the criminals running this government with science and actual reality as that has been my experience. Can you imagine what all 100 Senators did when I reasoned printing money at will when the energy is nonexistent and as Congress is not the Godhead it cannot then CREATE energy so what they are doing violates the universe not only WE, the people? That it violates all the laws of thermodynamics?
Do it as it will be fun.
Last edited:
