King of the Americas
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2001
- Messages
- 6,513
...if they are so stupid, then why do they have ALL the money?
Regardless of the title, I finally picked up a copy of Michael Moore's latest published work. It has been on the New York Times best seller list for a while. I found it worthy enough to check out at my local library.
I am only the first chapter deep, but I can already understand why people "groan" when they hear Mr. Moore bring up the 2000 Presidential Elections and the debacle in Florida. That horse died a full mile short of the finish line, and no amount of kicking the shattered bones is going to make those race results any different.
The problem is that he discusses ample proof that the race was fixed, and the other horse received 'unnatural' support in a falsified victory...WITHOUT proper annotation, might I add.
However, even without properly investigating the absolute accuracy of his notes, I am left with this feeling that the Democratic Process failed the Majority in Florida, and thus the greater National Majority, overall.
For only the second time, in our nation's history, 'most' of the People in America did NOT vote for this President. A narrow victory in a Republican ran state, decided this Presidency, and thus overruled the National Majority. But the 'system' worked...
What does that mean? The 'System'... Well, since voters were too incompetent to demonstrate a sincere majority, We had to decide for them...?
Elections aren't EVER perfect, well unless they small...
I mean you are gonna lose 1-2 in an election with thousands. However when thousands of voters were not allowed to cast votes, hundreds of votes were 'accepted' without proper verification, and confusing ballots cause more than a 5% voter error... That election needs amendment, because it failed the majority.
So that's where he starts...
I first saw Michael Moore in his "Roger & Me", I have it right here and I am about to watch it again. In it Mr. Moore trys to get an interview with a CEO from the car industry. Along the way he interviews some of the 'common folk' and the like. All that I can say is that its "REAL". I mean, I don't know how much 'acting' went into the production, but it didn't look like much.
I think Mr. Moore suffers from an 'image' problem. A diamond covered in shitte doesn't look appealing to a woman in white gloves, regardless of its value.
Have you read this man's work, or seen any of his productions?
Regardless of the title, I finally picked up a copy of Michael Moore's latest published work. It has been on the New York Times best seller list for a while. I found it worthy enough to check out at my local library.
I am only the first chapter deep, but I can already understand why people "groan" when they hear Mr. Moore bring up the 2000 Presidential Elections and the debacle in Florida. That horse died a full mile short of the finish line, and no amount of kicking the shattered bones is going to make those race results any different.
The problem is that he discusses ample proof that the race was fixed, and the other horse received 'unnatural' support in a falsified victory...WITHOUT proper annotation, might I add.
However, even without properly investigating the absolute accuracy of his notes, I am left with this feeling that the Democratic Process failed the Majority in Florida, and thus the greater National Majority, overall.
For only the second time, in our nation's history, 'most' of the People in America did NOT vote for this President. A narrow victory in a Republican ran state, decided this Presidency, and thus overruled the National Majority. But the 'system' worked...
What does that mean? The 'System'... Well, since voters were too incompetent to demonstrate a sincere majority, We had to decide for them...?
Elections aren't EVER perfect, well unless they small...
I mean you are gonna lose 1-2 in an election with thousands. However when thousands of voters were not allowed to cast votes, hundreds of votes were 'accepted' without proper verification, and confusing ballots cause more than a 5% voter error... That election needs amendment, because it failed the majority.
So that's where he starts...
I first saw Michael Moore in his "Roger & Me", I have it right here and I am about to watch it again. In it Mr. Moore trys to get an interview with a CEO from the car industry. Along the way he interviews some of the 'common folk' and the like. All that I can say is that its "REAL". I mean, I don't know how much 'acting' went into the production, but it didn't look like much.
I think Mr. Moore suffers from an 'image' problem. A diamond covered in shitte doesn't look appealing to a woman in white gloves, regardless of its value.
Have you read this man's work, or seen any of his productions?
