• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Stephen Jones - New Paper - Discovery of the Scientific Method

T.A.M.

Penultimate Amazing
T
Joined
Jul 25, 2006
Messages
20,795
Hot off the presses a new paper by Stephen Jones...apparently he has discovered the scientific method (finally) and now wishes to apply it to analysis of the events of 9/11

**NOte this is a PDF Link**

h-tee-tee-pee://journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/JonesWTC911SciMethod.pdf"]http://journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/JonesWTC911SciMethod.pdf

TAM:)
 
Last edited:
lol...I purposely added the h-tee-tee-pee...so as not to hotlink...lol

TAM:)
 
Lets see him apply the scientific method when his calculations are shown as wrong.

He is a liar.
 
Is this really a scientific paper?

Looks more like an overview article someone would write for the public.
 
Who is Ken Kuttler? and why is he doing the physics calculations for the physicist? Someone doesn't want to get their hands dirty. ;)
 
It reads like an article on how totally awesome Professor Jones is...

And then this:

Stephen Jones' Paper said:
Is this the full story? Where were the famous US air defenses that day? Why do so many uncritically accept the “9/11 official story” that a few hijackers in each of four planes overpowered well-trained airline pilots using box-cutters who subsequently brought down three World Trade Center skyscrapers and damaged the Pentagon without being intercepted by a single military jet?
Click to expand...

This [rule8] has not learned a thing. Pathetic.

-Gumboot
 
And he still has the audacity to call that internet rag "Journal of 9/11 Studies" a "peer-reviewed journal."

His "paper" is just so much recycled crap. Same old lies. Same old habit of ignoring reality.
 
This 'paper' is for lack of a better word, rubbish.

I have only read half so far and I feel compelled to post how bad this is. Not only are there several downright lies, there are several complete logical fallacies and appeals to authority. I will document them in a PDF I think because this is such an abject failure even an uneducated simp such as myself feels need to comment.
 
Is there a special name to an appeal to authority if the person doing the appealing is in fact the authority?

-Gumboot
 
appeal to a higher authority...or as I call it...PRAYER!!!

lol

TAM:)
 
gumboot said:
Is there a special name to an appeal to authority if the person doing the appealing is in fact the authority?

-Gumboot
Click to expand...

It's a form of inferential claim, because Steven Jones regards his journal's members and the CT community as a whole as being correct he feels that the 'results' they have produced carry some authority. I guess it is an Appeal to False Authority
 
well-trained airline pilots using box-cutters who subsequently brought down three World Trade Center skyscrapers and damaged the Pentagon without being intercepted by a single military jet
Click to expand...


I can't believe he's trying to blame it all on the pilots now!

Forget physics, do they even edit these papers for grammar?
 
Horatius said:
Forget physics, do they even edit these papers for grammar?
Click to expand...

Well I have always been told that when a paper is peer reviewed it will be sent back on the discovery of the first mistake. This one should be burned for the mistakes, and the grammar. The pilots had boxcutters? The boxcutter flew the planes into buildings? Stainless steel was used in the construction of the WTC? The buildings were demolited using silent Thermate cutting charges? Will someone please stick this guy in a straitjacket and find him a padded room?
 
T.A.M. said:
lol...I purposely added the h-tee-tee-pee...so as not to hotlink...lol

TAM:)
Click to expand...
That's just a link, not a hotlink. A hotlink is when content on another site appears on this one, such as a picture.
 
WildCat said:
That's just a link, not a hotlink. A hotlink is when content on another site appears on this one, such as a picture.
Click to expand...

ok, so linking to a PDF is ok, just dont post one (if that is possible) directly onto the forum...gotcha.

TAM:)
 
Jones said:
My respected Jewish colleague Professor Johann Rafelski and I published a significant paper in Scientific American in 1987.
Click to expand...
I just found it odd that he felt the need to point out that his colleague was Jewish. I guess this is a prelude to accusing Jews of doing 9/11, but it's not a bigoted accusation because he has a Jewish colleague?
 
Horatius said:
I can't believe he's trying to blame it all on the pilots now!

Forget physics, do they even edit these papers for grammar?
Click to expand...

Clearly, not very well. In true troofer fashion, there are far too many exclamation points and far too few commas, semi-colons, hyphens, and full stops.
 
e^n said:
This 'paper' is for lack of a better word, rubbish.

I have only read half so far and I feel compelled to post how bad this is. Not only are there several downright lies, there are several complete logical fallacies and appeals to authority. I will document them in a PDF I think because this is such an abject failure even an uneducated simp such as myself feels need to comment.
Click to expand...

He must have read Jim Fetzer's new book, about which I was just beginning to write a review...


Fetzer-Cover2.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom