Speaking of Cluelessness

Lurker

Illuminator
Lurker
Joined
May 15, 2002
Messages
4,189
Take a gander at this post, which I think shows just how clueless some of these Loose Changers are:

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=6483

very good point. they [The US Govt] are obviously remaining silent so that the truth does not gain wider attention.

if they had proof osama did it, they would provide said proof, and they would have provided the taliban a white-paper detailing Osama's guilt. The taliban would have handed him over, knowing they stand no chance against U.S. military might.

And most relevant of all -- Not a single American Soldier would have died in Afghanistan.
Click to expand...

Can you imagine? The US creates a "white paper" and the Taliban looks it over and hands over Osama. Riiight. LOL

Lurker
 
This is clueless:

What bothers me, is how Bush and company, have stood silent when hundreds of millions of people world wide are now questioning his part in the events of 9/11. Our nation is divided over these rumors and allegations. The cloud grows thicker over our adminstration and the way it governs our nation.
Click to expand...


Hundreds of millons? Really? A nation divided? The entire nation? Really?
 
LC Tr00ther said:
If they had proof osama did it, they would provide said proof, and they would have provided the taliban a white-paper detailing Osama's guilt. The taliban would have handed him over, knowing they stand no chance against U.S. military might.
Click to expand...


You know, the scary thing is that this was my actual prediction back in 2001. I thought the Taliban would hand over Bin Laden on the feeling that they just want to be crazy fundamentalists in Afghanistan and they didn't want anything to do with the US. In retrospect, I was wrong. I drastically underestimated the Taliban's belief that they were already engaged in some sort of world-wide war for Islam, their over-confidence after having defeated the Russians, and their general nuttiness.

To still believe these things about the Taliban in 2007, though ... that's just wacky.
 
Loss Leader said:
You know, the scary thing is that this was my actual prediction back in 2001. I thought the Taliban would hand over Bin Laden on the feeling that they just want to be crazy fundamentalists in Afghanistan and they didn't want anything to do with the US. In retrospect, I was wrong. I drastically underestimated the Taliban's belief that they were already engaged in some sort of world-wide war for Islam, their over-confidence after having defeated the Russians, and their general nuttiness.

To still believe these things about the Taliban in 2007, though ... that's just wacky.
Click to expand...

Well, I can see your point of view back then but to cling to it today like the 911 CTer is despite what we see in the Taliban is just cluelessness extraordinaire IMO.
 
 
cluepf0.jpg
 
~enigma~ said:
Man...everytime I see that picture of Charlie Sheen I wonder what happened to him physically.
Click to expand...

As do I. His grooming leaves much to be desired these days. Frankly, he looks wasted.
 
Not only cluelessness, but also rampant paranoia:

beached@LC said:
(altw1zard @ Mar 26 2007 said:
Turns out the Iranians DID infact capture the Brits and ARE infact holding them hostage in Iran.

False flag incident? I think not.
Click to expand...

How do you know that the Iranians have captured the Brits and are holding them hostage? Since all the information has been provided to us by the Zionist media, how do you know that this is not a Zionist hoax intended to further inflame Iranian-British-American relations? How do you know that the alleged captives are not MI5 agents or military personal engaged in a project to create the illusion of a hostage crisis? In fact, what evidence do you have the video footage of alleged hostages is authentic and was not recorded in the basement of the MI5 building in London?
Click to expand...

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=6149

Now, I ask you - is this a good case for retrospective abortion or what?
 
Obviousman said:
Not only cluelessness, but also rampant paranoia:



http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=6149

Now, I ask you - is this a good case for retrospective abortion or what?
Click to expand...

As you say, rampant paranoia.

That particular poster is just one step away from the realisation that nothing is real, not even his family or even himself.

Of course, in 'truth' paranoia is selectively used.

After all, they believe the 'zionist controlled media' can feed us this story, and that MI5 could be creating the story, but they still use their computer with its intel/AMD cpu and they run an operating system written by someone else and use software and firewalls and virus scanners all created by companies which could also be 'zionist controlled', and they log on to an internet message board/forum/blog (controlled by whom? You guessed it)..... and they trust all of these things, because without them, quite frankly they would have NO LIFE whatsoever.
:cool:
 
Loss Leader said:
You know, the scary thing is that this was my actual prediction back in 2001. I thought the Taliban would hand over Bin Laden on the feeling that they just want to be crazy fundamentalists in Afghanistan and they didn't want anything to do with the US. In retrospect, I was wrong. I drastically underestimated the Taliban's belief that they were already engaged in some sort of world-wide war for Islam, their over-confidence after having defeated the Russians, and their general nuttiness.
Click to expand...


I was thinking along those lines in 2001 as well. "Surely they don't want to take on the Americans. Surely." I was wrong. :con2:

Cheers,
TGHO
 
beachnut said:
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/12447460d8430f0ca9.jpg[/qimg]
LCFC (Loose Change no Flocking Clue)
Click to expand...

A) I cannot believe how rule8ing smug Avery and Korey look in that bloody photo

B) How long does charlie sheen have to spend in makeup every day to appear in that two and half men, fiasco, to look like a sane human being? Theres a man in mortal fear of HD.

The taliban would have handed him over, knowing they stand no chance against U.S. military might.
Click to expand...

Um what? It's been six years and the taliban haven't been defeated, what do you mean, "no chance"?
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by beached@LC
Originally Posted by (altw1zard @ Mar 26 2007, 01:29 AM)
Turns out the Iranians DID infact capture the Brits and ARE infact holding them hostage in Iran.
Click to expand...
False flag incident? I think not.
How do you know that the Iranians have captured the Brits and are holding them hostage? Since all the information has been provided to us by the Zionist media, how do you know that this is not a Zionist hoax intended to further inflame Iranian-British-American relations? How do you know that the alleged captives are not MI5 agents or military personal engaged in a project to create the illusion of a hostage crisis? In fact, what evidence do you have the video footage of alleged hostages is authentic and was not recorded in the basement of the MI5 building in London?
Click to expand...

Aaah, but how do we know that beached is a truthseeking fighter against Zionist lies and not an internet disinformation agent from the Iranian Secret police!

yeah,,,,ever think about that? eh? eh?;)
 
Loss Leader said:
You know, the scary thing is that this was my actual prediction back in 2001. I thought the Taliban would hand over Bin Laden on the feeling that they just want to be crazy fundamentalists in Afghanistan and they didn't want anything to do with the US. In retrospect, I was wrong. I drastically underestimated the Taliban's belief that they were already engaged in some sort of world-wide war for Islam, their over-confidence after having defeated the Russians, and their general nuttiness.

To still believe these things about the Taliban in 2007, though ... that's just wacky.
Click to expand...


I figured they would not hand him over for two reasons
1) their ideology was very similar to that of Al-Qada
2) they could not have handed him over even if they wanted to without a very large fight that they were unwilling to attempt.

It is not like the Taliban controlled such superior forces that Al-Qada would roll over and hand Bin Laden over to be given to the USA. Then there is the very real danger of a mutiny by troops sent to arrest Bin Laden or even a coup.


No, Bin Laden was never going to have the Taliban turn on him.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom