• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Spammers Are Getting Clever...

sophia8

Master Poster
Joined
Oct 28, 2003
Messages
2,457
Got a spam email this morning, What was so different about it?
The subject line was "Evacuation process has been started due to radiation leaks at Sizewell B Suffolk Nucklear Power Station".
The message was:
"BBC, Suffolk - Major Problems have been occured at Sizewell B Nucklear Power Station - 13-years old circuit breaker fails to close, creating a 4,500-volt arc and fire. Possible radiation leaks on
100miles area. Evacuation process has been started - See video". With a helpful link to the video".
I thought "WHA---!!!!" and had almost clicked on the link before my brain kicked in.

Googling around, I find that this and similar emails have been all over the internets for a couple of days, with different nuke power stations named for different countries (maybe some sort of IP address sorting?).
In spite of myself, I have to admire their social engineering skills. The content of the email is so alarming that many people won't think before hitting the link.
 
Last edited:
Many years ago when the Usenet Group can.infohighway was in full flower, a university student ask us whether we had ever received any information over the Internet and what we had done with it. I replied that I had received gigabytes and ignored it all. :D
 
They might be getting cleverer, but their spelling isn't improving, I see...
 
They might be getting cleverer, but their spelling isn't improving, I see...

Cleverer? Maybe I'm even more ignorant than I think...
Nucklear Power Station - 13-years old circuit breaker fails to close, creating a 4,500-volt arc and fire

:confused: Don't circuit breakers do their job by opening?
 
Got a spam email this morning, What was so different about it?
The subject line was "Evacuation process has been started due to radiation leaks at Sizewell B Suffolk Nucklear Power Station".
The message was:
"BBC, Suffolk - Major Problems have been occured at Sizewell B Nucklear Power Station - 13-years old circuit breaker fails to close, creating a 4,500-volt arc and fire. Possible radiation leaks on
100miles area. Evacuation process has been started - See video". With a helpful link to the video".
I thought "WHA---!!!!" and had almost clicked on the link before my brain kicked in.

Googling around, I find that this and similar emails have been all over the internets for a couple of days, with different nuke power stations named for different countries (maybe some sort of IP address sorting?).
In spite of myself, I have to admire their social engineering skills. The content of the email is so alarming that many people won't think before hitting the link.

Ha-Ha! The joke is on you. That really happened and you should start glowing any day now.
 
Unless law enforcement can deal with this, it means the internet will be useless in a few years. Spam emails at the company I work for are increasing out of control, and causing numerous problems. A Spam filter just can't block them all, without causing side effects.
 
Unless law enforcement can deal with this, it means the internet will be useless in a few years. Spam emails at the company I work for are increasing out of control, and causing numerous problems. A Spam filter just can't block them all, without causing side effects.

Woohoo... I see an opportunity for a homeopathic spam filter - guaranteed to have no side effects. I'm gonna be rich.

;)
 
Cleverer? Maybe I'm even more ignorant than I think...


:confused: Don't circuit breakers do their job by opening?
A nerd responds:

And closing.

A high-voltage circuit breaker comprises three individual phases, each of which must successfully and simultaneously open (or close) to operate. A failure of a single phase to perform would result in phase unbalance, a flashover, and possible highly destructive loss of the circuit breaker. This fault not only could happen, it does happen.
 
Last edited:
I've heard the idea mooted that if you were charged a nominal fee - even 0.01p (or cents) per email, spamming would become uneconomical.

Makes sense to me, and although it would heap costs on some companies, I think maybe eventually we'll hit a point where there's no other choice.
 
There's one simple, yet significant, flaw in this proposed solution: who collects the revenue?

If it's the ISPs, then there is one easy workaround for the spammers: set up their own servers

idog.jpg
 
Not to mention fraud in paying the fee (don't pay bill when it arrives, pay with bogus check/funds, or - more likely - hijack a legitimate user's account so they're stuck with the bill).

The latter, actually, is most likely, given that a lot of spam is a) sent from compromised computers and b) has forged originating addresses.

This suggestion comes up on Slashdot every once in a while, and generally gets shot down right away.
 
Ahh. You both raise valid points. I suppose the counterargument is that making end users pay - even if just nominally, would be the only way to make them take security seriously. As to setting up their own ISPs, I suppose you'd have to tax them according to volume, and then the rest of the net could unleash hardcore spam filters on the jurisdictions that didn't tax - but then that rather defeats the point, because you could simply use a trusted list of ISPs that didn't allow spammers in the first place without bothering with financial jiggery-pokery, if the ISPs could/would do anything about it.

What you'd do about forged addresses is another question entire. You may well be right, it might be unworkable - to be honest I haven't thought about it that hard.

Internet. Tricky business.
 
As far as the arcing goes, see these: http://205.243.100.155/frames/longarc.htm . The comments all mention the fact that the arcing occurred due to unexpected conditions, and that opening interrupters (circuit breakers) up-line was what extinguished them, so it is conceivable that a breaker not opening could facilitate such an arcing fire.
 

Back
Top Bottom