• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

South Sudan

Arguably South Sudan is an attempted correction for a divide-and-rule Colonial era balls-up. They (Christians and animists) took the decision that they'd rather be independent and poverty stricken than mis-ruled and abused by the Islamist government in Khatoum. One can hardly blame them.
 
South Sudan is just another born-to-fail statelet created by The Empire out of geopolitical reasons, like Kosovo.

Do the people running the place have any responsibility at all? Are they powerless to make any changes for the better?

Is Sudan "the Empire" of which you speak? It seems to me that a lot of South Sudan's problems are a result of policies from when it was part of Sudan.

Maybe not everything is best understood by your anti-Imperialist paradigm?
 
Last edited:
Do the people running the place have any responsibility at all? Are they powerless to make any changes for the better?

Is Sudan "the Empire" of which you speak? It seems to me that a lot of South Sudan's problems are a result of policies from when it was part of Sudan.

Maybe not everything is best understood by your anti-Imperialist paradigm?

To some people with a sledge hammer, everything looks like a watermelon ...
 
CUMWN6i.gif


China controls that pipeline to Port Sudan. The railway south from Juba was/is built by the company of a German school buddy of the statelet's president.
 
Last edited:
Okay. Can you make the connection between this and our topic a little more clear for me?

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk
 
Okay. Can you make the connection between this and our topic a little more clear for me?

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk


"Our" topic, your majesty, is smearing people criticizing the unjust power structure you seem to be so much in love with, and has nothing to do with the topic of this thread, which is the very young country of South Sudan and its woes, in whose, as always, natural resources are a defining factor.
 
Last edited:
"Our" topic, your majesty, is smearing people criticizing the unjust power structure you seem to be so much in love with, and has nothing to do with the topic of this thread, which is the very young country of South Sudan and its woes, in whose, as always, natural resources are a defining factor.
You gotta help me more than that. Are you saying China is "the Empire"? Germany? Or just anything that's not third world?

I don't necessarily disagree that the power structure is unjust, I'm just unable to tell from your words what you think this power structure is.

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk
 
You're again loudly failing to address the topic of this thread with your boring attempts at making it about my view of the world. Take what I gave you (information) as a present and stop those silly attempts at derailing the discussion of the topic, bro.
 
Last edited:
You're again loudly failing to address the topic of this thread with your boring attempts at making it about my view of the world. Take what I gave you (information) as a present and stop those silly attempts at derailing the discussion of the topic, bro.
No. I'm trying to understand what you said on this topic. I don't understand why you should want to make that hard.

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk
 
Arguably South Sudan is an attempted correction for a divide-and-rule Colonial era balls-up. They (Christians and animists) took the decision that they'd rather be independent and poverty stricken than mis-ruled and abused by the Islamist government in Khatoum. One can hardly blame them.
Fair enough. But the ink wasn't yet dry on the independence, and instead of building up the country, they started a civil war between the two major tribes.

The railway south from Juba was/is built by the company of a German school buddy of the statelet's president.
Well it is about high time that Sir Cecil Rhodes' little project comes to completion, don't you think?

And for trade, and thus economy, highways and railways are of utmost importance. South Sudan is land-locked and the Nile is hardly navigable upstream from Juba.
 
"Our" topic, your majesty, is smearing people criticizing the unjust power structure you seem to be so much in love with, and has nothing to do with the topic of this thread, which is the very young country of South Sudan and its woes, in whose, as always, natural resources are a defining factor.

The power structure never really thought complete independence was a good idea.
 

Back
Top Bottom