• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Skeptic hits back

Richard

Muse
Joined
Aug 1, 2001
Messages
960
Here is my part of my reply to the cr@p article in the Daily Telegraph.

Readers of the Daily Telegraph opinion section by Brendan Shanahan, "Tragedy of scoffing sceptics" on Friday the 30th of March, may have been scratching their heads in bemusement. Quite frankly, so were we.

The full reply at: http://www.skeptics.com.au/
 
It's a sad story in many ways. One of those sad aspects is that it is not unusual.

There is such a drive in the minds of many to leap to a miraculous explanation, and dismiss non-supernatural explanations without a thought. That in itself is worrisome, but there are some who go so far as to publicly insult people who politely suggest that there might not be an authentic miracle here.

Skeptics aren't p*ssing all over anybody's faith by suggesting that they exercise a little criticism. Indeed, it can be argued that Jesus Christ himself urged critical examination of supposed miracle-workers and signs. "Be not deceived," Jesus urged (Luke 21:8), teaching that many of these wonders would be false or mere natural occurrences.

In the case of this house, there are many hints that the occurrences are of human invention. One that was immediately apparent to me is that the narrow streams of oil on the wall originated from a large spot of oil at the top of the narrow stream. This is indicative not of a wall oozing oil, but of a person throwing drops of oil onto a wall, thereby creating a large spot from which the oil drips down in a narrow stream.

This is, of course, just a guess on my part, but I can easily create an experiment to determine what sort of pattern would be created if an individual were to fling oil against a wall.
 

Back
Top Bottom