• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Should we fear the Democratic Party?

uke2se said:
No, everything he's written makes sense. Your reaction is what doesn't make sense.
Click to expand...
Hey, don't blame me for having a far better sense of US politics than you or he, and for being an independent thinker who tries not to let my personal hopes and dreams -- which pretty much align with Bernie -- outweigh reality.
 
Cabbage said:
....nor is the belief that Sanders would have lost to Trump.
Click to expand...

It is by the fact that Clinton, not Sanders, won the Nomination.
I fail to see the argument that voters would be more enthusiastic for the candidate they didn't vote for earlier that year.
 
The Great Zaganza said:
It is by the fact that Clinton, not Sanders, won the Nomination.
I fail to see the argument that voters would be more enthusiastic for the candidate they didn't vote for earlier that year.
Click to expand...

Let me explain it. Within a rounding error everyone that thinks Sanders could have beaten Trump '16 or will in 2020 buy, to some degree, into the conspiracy theory that Sanders was cheated out of the nomination in '16.
 
Last edited:
The Great Zaganza said:
It is by the fact that Clinton, not Sanders, won the Nomination.
I fail to see the argument that voters would be more enthusiastic for the candidate they didn't vote for earlier that year.
Click to expand...


Actually, it's not. Voting is not transitive. This is well known.
 
Chuck Schumer threatens two sitting members of the Supreme Court:

"I want to tell you, Gorsuch. I want to tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price!" Schumer warned. "You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom