• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Shifting Appeaser Mantras

Patrick

Graduate Poster
P
Joined
Jul 3, 2004
Messages
1,224
Appeasers, before the crushing of the IFs in Fallujah:

"How can Bush say we're winning the war? They don't even have control of big cities like Fallujah!"

Appeasers, after the crushing of the IFs in Fallujah:

"Uh, er, Fallujah didn't matter that much - the insurgents are attacking in other places."
 
Patrick said:
"Abandoned piles of rubble like Fallujah no longer matter that much - the insurgents are attacking in other places."
Click to expand...

Corrected.
 
Re: Re: Shifting Appeaser Mantras

Matabiri said:
"The insurgents not buried in piles of rubble are attacking in other places."
Click to expand...
Corrected.
 
Patrick said:
Appeasers, before the crushing of the IFs in Fallujah:

"How can Bush say we're winning the war? They don't even have control of big cities like Fallujah!"

Appeasers, after the crushing of the IFs in Fallujah:

"Uh, er, Fallujah didn't matter that much - the insurgents are attacking in other places."
Click to expand...

Patrick, you have inaccurately accused me of being an "appeaser", dishonestly continued those accusations while unable to provide evidence of your accusation of traitorous behavior on my part, and then admitted that you did not even know my position when you accused me of that crime.

I require that you retract your accusation, and agree publically that I am no such thing, that your accusation was inaccurate, and intended to cause my reputation actual harm, and that you expressly wished to incite hatred by making a poorly researched claim that you have insisted on supporting despite your inability to even demonstrate that you are aware of my position on the matter.

Patrick, you made it up, now be a man and admit that you completely, utterly falsified my position.

Retract your accusation, and admit that you improperly called me an 'appeaser' and that furthermore you have now admitted that you DID NOT EVEN KNOW MY POSITION WHEN YOU MADE THAT SERIOUS ACCUSTATION.

In the future, given your performance to present, I would propose that you must be required to absolutely show, beyond the doubt of any reader here, evidence that someone is an "appeaser" before you should even be allowed to utter that word. You are shown to clearly be, at the very least, negligent in researching your accusations, as well as shown to insist on your accusations in the absense of any proof whatsoever. The first may be negligence, the second is not negligence.

Retract.

Furthermore, show evidence that:

1) Anyone actually holds the positions you describe in the OP.
2) That holding such a position makes a person an "appeaser".

Until you do so, in a convincing, repeatable, testable, externally verifiable manner, you are nothing but a prating windbag, a would-be tempest in a teapot, attempting to create hatred from nothing.
 
Patrick, you have inaccurately accused me of being an "appeaser", dishonestly continued those accusations while unable to provide evidence of your accusation of traitorous behavior on my part, and then admitted that you did not even know my position when you accused me of that crime.

Are still on this?? When I said I didn't know your position, I was as much as giving you the concession you wanted. I also asked you to state your opinion on the Iraq war - you didn't, but like an utter sh_t refused to graciously acknowledge my concession. Instead, you're still whimpering. Once again, succinctly state your position on the iraq war
 
Patrick, just so you know I've gotten so sick of your Coulter-esque mouth-frothing nonsense that you're on my ignore list. I've already explained to you my disgust with the "appeaser" label. I don't have the eloquence (or the inclination) to match JJ's post in a similar vein.

So I'll put it inelegantly: you are a child. There is no sense in arguing with a child, so I'm not going to bother doing it. I have no idea what's in your parent post and I'm never ever going to read it.

When I heard conservative blowhards on TV equating protest of the war with "Saddam appeasement" I crossed them off my list of people who know ◊◊◊◊-all about anything. I have done the same with you. If you wanted to be taken seriously I'm afraid you completely and totally blew it. I will never read another post of yours again, and I suspect that a goodly percentage of the people on this board won't do it either. That I put you on my ignore list and not 1-in-Christ ought to give you some indication of the esteem I hold you in. At least 1-in has some tasteful font styles to offset his phony outrage.
 
Patrick said:
Patrick, you have inaccurately accused me of being an "appeaser", dishonestly continued those accusations while unable to provide evidence of your accusation of traitorous behavior on my part, and then admitted that you did not even know my position when you accused me of that crime.

Are still on this?? When I said I didn't know your position, I was as much as giving you the concession you wanted. I also asked you to state your opinion on the Iraq war - you didn't, but like an utter sh_t refused to graciously acknowledge my concession. Instead, you're still whimpering. Once again, succinctly state your position on the iraq war
Click to expand...

Patrick, you have routinely accused people who disagree with you of being "appeasers". Your performance in this matter makes it obvious, and trivially so, that you are using the term as a form of hate speech.

You made an accusation about me when you didn't even know my position.

You AGAIN admit you haven't any idea of my position.

Yet, you still demand that I provide evidence FOR OR AGAINST your assertion. You made an entirely false accusation, and now you demand that I support (or not) your allegation. That's not how it works. You support your allegations. I'm not obligated to do anything, and all I'm going to do is to point out your relentless failure to prove your ridiculous claims, and your attempts at weaselling.

Be a man and admit you messed up, big time.

I'm simply going to remind everyone here, again and again, how you use the word "appeaser" carelessly, inaccurately, and how you refuse to support your accusations, rather demanding that the victim of your attack defend his or her self.

And retract your accusation about me.
 
Patrick, just so you know I've gotten so sick of your Coulter-esque mouth-frothing nonsense that you're on my ignore list.

I'm crushed!! :)

I've already explained to you my disgust with the "appeaser" label.

I can understand that - some can't take it when someone else nails them for what they are.

So I'll put it inelegantly: you are a child. There is no sense in arguing with a child, so I'm not going to bother doing it. I have no idea what's in your parent post and I'm never ever going to read it.

Y'all keep saying things like that - but then you come back again and again for me to kick your ass! Are you masochists? :)

I have done the same with you. If you wanted to be taken seriously I'm afraid you completely and totally blew it. I will never read another post of yours again, and I suspect that a goodly percentage of the people on this board won't do it either. That I put you on my ignore list and not 1-in-Christ ought to give you some indication of the esteem I hold you in. At least 1-in has some tasteful font styles to offset his phony outrage.

Why are you blathering so hot heavy about how you're going to ignore me? When I want to ignore somebody, I just ignore them! :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom